Knowledge Flow between International Patent Classification Numbers and Knowledge Spillover Measures between Technology Sectors: Based on China??s Authorized Patent Data
Wang Gege, Liu Shulin
School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430000
王格格, 刘树林. 国际专利分类号间的知识流动与技术间知识溢出测度——基于中国发明授权专利数据[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(11): 1162-1170.
Wang Gege, Liu Shulin. Knowledge Flow between International Patent Classification Numbers and Knowledge Spillover Measures between Technology Sectors: Based on China??s Authorized Patent Data. 情报学报, 2020, 39(11): 1162-1170.
1 马歇尔. 经济学原理[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1964. 2 Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention[M]// The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962: 609-626. 3 Romer P M. Increasing returns and long-run growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94(5): 1002-1037. 4 Krugman P. Geography and trade[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991. 5 Jaffe A B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value[J]. The American Economic Review, 1986, 76(5): 984-1001. 6 Luh Y H, Jiang W J, Huang S C. Trade-related spillovers and industrial competitiveness: Exploring the linkages for OECD countries[J]. Economic Modelling, 2016, 54: 309-325. 7 陈颂, 卢晨. 基于行业技术相似度的FDI技术溢出效应研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(1): 106-118. 8 梁圣蓉, 罗良文. 国际研发资本技术溢出对绿色技术创新效率的动态效应[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(3): 21-29. 9 Lim U. The spatial distribution of innovative activity in U.S. met-ropolitan areas: Evidence from patent data[J]. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 2003, 33(2): 97-126. 10 项歌德, 朱平芳, 张征宇. 经济结构、R&D投入及构成与R&D空间溢出效应[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(2): 206-214. 11 吕新军, 代春霞. 研发投入异质性与区域技术创新溢出效应[J]. 经济经纬, 2017, 34(4): 19-24. 12 朱平芳, 项歌德, 王永水. 中国工业行业间R&D溢出效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(11): 44-55. 13 Jaffe A B, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3): 577-598. 14 Leydesdorff L, Carley S, Rafols I. Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(2): 589-593. 15 Kim D H, Lee B K, Sohn S Y. Quantifying technology-industry spillover effects based on patent citation network analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2016, 105: 140-157. 16 胡健, 印玺. 基于专利引用的技术流矩阵的分析——对石油天然气产业技术溢出效应的测度[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(12): 1843-1848, 1860. 17 吴菲菲, 李睿毓, 黄鲁成, 等. 跨产业技术溢出识别与效应测度研究——以无人机技术为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(6): 84-98. 18 Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10: 92-116. 19 林原, 马荣康, 刘凤朝. 技术流动对区域技术专业化的影响研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(7): 13-23. 20 Noh H, Song Y K, Lee S. Identifying emerging core technologies for the future: Case study of patents published by leading telecommunication organizations[J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2016, 40(10-11): 956-970. 21 周萌, 朱相丽. 新兴技术概念辨析及其识别方法研究进展[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(10): 162-169. 22 郗建红, 彭爱东. 专利被引频次与专利分类跨领域相关性研究——以中国在美国授权专利为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(4): 92-97. 23 杨中楷, 刘倩楠, 于霜. 基于专利引文网络的技术领域间关系探析[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(5): 149-155. 24 黄斌, 黄鲁成, 吴菲菲, 等. 度量专利表征技术的差异[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(10): 34-37. 25 周磊, 杨威, 张玉峰. 基于专利挖掘的突破性创新识别框架研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(9): 73-76, 46. 26 Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(1): 69-87. 27 Lim H, Park Y. Identification of technological knowledge intermediaries[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(3): 543-561. 28 Park H, Yoon J. Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: The case of Korean national R&D[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2): 853-890. 29 Schmoch U. Concept of a technology classification for country comparison: Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation[R]. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, 2008. 30 Tassey G. The disaggregated technology production function: A new model of university and corporate research[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(3): 287-303.
