学者身份管理系统元数据分布规律研究

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2021.02.001

情报学报

2021, Vol. 40

Issue (2): 115-124 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2021.02.001

情报理论与应用

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

学者身份管理系统元数据分布规律研究

司莉, 陈辰

武汉大学信息管理学院，武汉 430072

Research on the Metadata of Scholar Identity Management Systems

Si Li, Chen Chen

School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (4165 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本文通过对研究学者在不同身份管理系统中分布以及元数据使用情况的研究，对于了解各个系统的功能目标及差异，构建有效的身份管理和元数据增强策略，实现身份管理领域的数据共享和重用具有重要作用。本文以100名中国学者作为调查样本，分析其在中文名称规范联合数据库、百度学者、ORCID、ScopusID和Publons共5个身份管理系统中的识别分布情况，并结合词频统计、共现分析及主成分分析方法，度量并分析身份管理系统在元数据结构以及信息量分布上的差异。研究发现，学者在不同类型的身份管理系统中呈现不同的识别和共现特点；同一系统内部的元素分布并不平衡，且不同系统间的元数据结构也呈现差异性；并非所有身份系统的元素指标均具有很强的相关性，而是呈现出2个不同的成分分组，且各个系统元素对于各组信息量的贡献率也不一致。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	司莉
	陈辰

关键词 ：身份管理系统, 元数据, 数据复用, 中国学者

收稿日期: 2019-12-05

基金资助:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“‘一带一路’沿线国家多语种、共享型经济管理数据库建设研究”（19JZD020）。

作者简介: 司莉，女，1965年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为信息组织、科研数据管理；陈辰，女，1985年生，博士研究生，主要研究方向为科研信息组织、规范控制，E-mail:chenchensee@163.co；

引用本文:

司莉, 陈辰. 学者身份管理系统元数据分布规律研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(2): 115-124.
Si Li, Chen Chen. Research on the Metadata of Scholar Identity Management Systems. 情报学报, 2021, 40(2): 115-124.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2021.02.001 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I2/115

1 Smith-Yoshimura K, Altman M, Conlon M, et al. Registering researchers in authority files[R]. Dublin: OCLC Research, 2014: 1-29.
2 Wu S H, Stvilia B, Lee D J. Readers, personal record managers, and community members: an exploratory study of researchers’ participation in online research information management systems[J]. Journal of Library Metadata, 2017, 17(2): 57-90.
3 Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF), the British Library (BL). A global strategy for authority metadata and identifiers: Lessons learnt from VIAF and ISNI and how to build a sustainable future[EB/OL]. [2019-11-26]. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/PoCo-2016/VIAF-ISNI-position-paper.pdf.
4 Stvilia B, Wu S H, Lee D J. A framework for researcher participation in Research Information Management Systems[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2019, 45(3): 195-202.
5 Waugh L, Tarver H, Edward Phillips M. Introducing name authority into an ETD collection[J]. Library Management, 2014, 35(4/5): 271-283.
6 Panigabutra-Roberts A. Researcher identity management in the 21st Century networked world: A pilot study of American University in Cairo Faculty[EB/OL]. [2019-09-10]. http://swib.org/swib15/ slides/panigabutra_researchers.pdf.
7 Sandberg J, Jin Q. How should catalogers provide authority control for journal article authors? Name identifiers in the linked data world[J]. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 2016, 54(8): 537-552.
8 Tran C Y, Lyon J A. Faculty use of author identifiers and researcher networking tools[J]. College & Research Libraries, 2017, 78(2): 171-182.
9 Panigabutra-Roberts A. Researchers identifiers, metadata and scholarly communication in the linked data[EB/OL]. [2019-09-04]. https://www.open-science-conference.eu/archive/open-science-con ference-2018/call/.
10 Ortega J L. Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC's members[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(1): 39-49.
11 Lee D J, Stvilia B, Wu S H. Towards a metadata model for research information management systems[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2020, 38(3): 577-592.
12 Stvilia B, Gasser L. Value-based metadata quality assessment[J]. Library & Information Science Research, 2008, 30(1): 67-74.
13 PCC Task Groups. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloging) strategic directions January 2018-December 2021[EB/OL]. [2019-11-26]. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/about/PCC-Strategic-Directions-2018-2021.pdf.
14 Angjeli A, Mac Ewan A, Boulet V. ISNI and VIAF—Transforming ways of trustfully consolidating identities[EB/OL]. [2019-11-28]. http://library.ifla.org/985/1/086-angjeli-en.pdf.
15 Bilder G. Disambiguation without de-duplication: Modeling authority and trust in the ORCID system[EB/OL]. [2019-09-16]. https://www.crossref.org/wp/labs/whitepapers/disambiguation-deduplication-wp-v4.pdf.
16 NACO, Authority Control, and Identity Management: evolving strategies for a changing name authorities landscape[EB/OL]. (2017-12-06)[2019-09-11]. http://downloads.alcts.ala.org/ce/20171206_NACO_Authority_Control_Identity_Management_Slides.pdf.
17 Shi Y Q, Jia J Z. Use and presentation of personal name components in Chinese authority files[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2018, 44(4): 477-485.
18 Supplementary charge to the PCC TG on identity management in NACO[EB/OL]. (2017-10-18) [2019-09-10]. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/Facil-Session-2017/Advice%20for%202018-2021%20PCC%20Strategic%20Directions%20Document_.pdf.
19 Ilik V. Why not share?[EB/OL]. [2019-09-09]. https://ilikvioleta.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-not-share.html?zx=c53551c1c27a4a12.
20 Mu?oz-Pinedo C. Chinese reviewers: sign up for unique IDs, please[J]. Nature, 2019, 565(7738): 161.
21 PCC Task Groups.Charge for PCC task group on identity management in NACO[EB/OL]. [2019-09-01]. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/taskgroup/PCC-TG-Identity-Manageme.
22 Salo D. Name authority control in institutional repositories[J]. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 2009, 47(3/4): 249-261.