探寻颠覆性技术的基础研究来源：基于个体创新主体视角

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2025.10.007

情报学报

2025, Vol. 44

Issue (10): 1300-1314 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2025.10.007

情报技术与应用

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

探寻颠覆性技术的基础研究来源：基于个体创新主体视角

何郁冰, 何丽, 徐美娟

福州大学经济与管理学院，福州 350108

Sources of Basic Research for Disruptive Technologies: Individual Innovation Subject Perspective

He Yubing, He Li, Xu Meijuan

School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (13098 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要颠覆性技术是推动科技革命和产业变革的关键因素，通常源自基础科学的重大突破。探寻颠覆性技术的基础研究来源对于识别核心基础学科、预测技术趋势具有重要意义。其中，个体层面的创新主体发挥了重要的桥梁作用。以中国石墨烯领域为例，基于个体创新主体视角，探讨了基础研究与颠覆性技术之间存在的知识关联与群体知识异质性。首先，通过识别颠覆性技术筛选出相应的个体创新主体，收集科学论文数据；其次，利用作者-主题模型（author-topic model，ATM）进行主题识别，通过主题相似度分析基础研究与颠覆性技术的知识关联情况；最后，根据颠覆性技术发明数量划分个体创新主体群，利用主题多样性指标分析低产创新主体群和高产创新主体群的研究兴趣多样性，并构建作者-主题关联知识网络，分析基础研究与颠覆性技术的群体异质性。研究结果表明，中国石墨烯领域的科学和技术主题都经历由浅入深的演变，个体创新主体的基础研究与颠覆性技术之间存在知识关联，而且随着时间推移而逐渐紧密；发明不同数量颠覆性专利的个体创新主体在主题多样性和主体紧密程度方面存在一定差异，高产发明人在保持研究多样性的同时逐步增加研究深度，形成特定的研究体系，群体内具有“小世界”效应。研究结论为识别、培育和发展颠覆性技术，推进颠覆性技术导向的基础研究提供了情报支撑。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	何郁冰
	何丽
	徐美娟

关键词 ：基础研究, 颠覆性技术, 个体创新主体, ATM模型

收稿日期: 2025-01-17

基金资助:国家社会科学基金重点项目“基于创新生态系统的颠覆性技术创新形成机理与演化路径研究”（19AGL008）。

作者简介: 何郁冰，1974年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为创新管理；何丽，通信作者，2000年生，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为创新管理，E-mail：heli43540@163.com；徐美娟，1996年生，博士研究生，主要研究方向为创新管理；

引用本文:

何郁冰, 何丽, 徐美娟. 探寻颠覆性技术的基础研究来源：基于个体创新主体视角[J]. 情报学报, 2025, 44(10): 1300-1314.
He Yubing, He Li, Xu Meijuan. Sources of Basic Research for Disruptive Technologies: Individual Innovation Subject Perspective. 情报学报, 2025, 44(10): 1300-1314.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2025.10.007 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2025/V44/I10/1300

1 Zhou Y, Yan L Z, Liu X. A quantitative study of disruptive technology policy texts: an example of China’s artificial intelligence policy[J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2024, 9(3): 155-180.
2 王康, 陈悦, 宋超, 等. 颠覆性技术: 概念辨析与特征分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(11): 1937-1946.
3 徐晓丹, 柳卸林. 大企业为什么要重视基础研究?[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(9): 3-19.
4 董坤, 许海云, 罗瑞, 等. 科学与技术的关系分析研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(6): 642-652.
5 Schoenmakers W, Duysters G. The technological origins of radical inventions[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(8): 1051-1059.
6 刘小玲, 谭宗颖, 张超星. 国内外“科学-技术关系”研究方法述评——聚焦文献计量方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(13): 142-148.
7 V.布什. 科学——没有止境的前沿[M]. 范岱年, 解道华, 等译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2004.
8 Carpenter M P, Narin F. Validation study: patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence[J]. World Patent Information, 1983, 5(3): 180-185.
9 Kwon S, Liu X Y, Porter A L, et al. Research addressing emerging technological ideas has greater scientific impact[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(9): 103834.
10 Meyer M. Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology[J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(10): 1646-1662.
11 Zhang G J, Liu L N, Wei F F. Key nodes mining in the inventor–author knowledge diffusion network[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 118(3): 721-735.
12 陈稳, 陈伟. 科学与技术对比视角下的前沿主题识别与演化分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(1): 67-73, 163.
13 Xu H Y, Yue Z H, Pang H S, et al. Integrative model for discovering linked topics in science and technology[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(2): 101265.
14 Ke Q. Technological impact of biomedical research: the role of basicness and novelty[J]. Research Policy, 2020, 49(7): 104071.
15 Leten B, Kelchtermans S, Belderbos R. How does basic research improve innovation performance in the world’s major pharmaceutical firms?[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2022, 29(3): 396-424.
16 张守明, 张斌, 张笔峰, 等. 颠覆性技术的特征与预见方法[J]. 科技导报, 2019, 37(19): 19-25.
17 Leung T Y, Sharma P. Differences in the impact of R&D intensity and R&D internationalization on firm performance-mediating role of innovation performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 131: 81-91.
18 曹阳春, 张静, 张光宇, 等. 颠覆性技术多元化投入机制构建思路的案例研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(3): 37-48.
19 Cao Q W, Li Y, Peng H T. From university basic research to firm innovation: diffusion mechanism and boundary conditions under a U-shaped relationship[J]. Technovation, 2023, 123: 102718.
20 王辉, 冯峥, 袁礼, 等. 公共科研机构绿色研发介入与企业绿色创新——基于环境外部性视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024(9): 81-99.
21 Ceccagnoli M, Lee Y N, Walsh J P. Reaching beyond low-hanging fruit: Basic research and innovativeness[J]. Research Policy, 2024, 53(1): 104912.
22 滕子优, 朱雪忠, 胡成, 等. 创新主体在城市群知识网络中的角色——基于科学与技术关联视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(6): 1288-1299.
23 Colen L, Belderbos R, Kelchtermans S, et al. Reaching for the stars: when does basic research collaboration between firms and academic star scientists benefit firm invention performance?[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2022, 39(2): 222-264.
24 唐旭丽, 李信. 科研团队多样性对学术颠覆性创新的影响研究——以人工智能领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(1): 43-58.
25 Bu Y, Ding Y, Liang X K, et al. Understanding persistent scientific collaboration[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(3): 438-448.
26 Winnink J J, Tijssen R J W. R&D dynamics and scientific breakthroughs in HIV/AIDS drugs development: the case of Integrase Inhibitors[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1): 1-16.
27 Audia P G, Goncalo J A. Past success and creativity over time: a study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(1): 1-15.
28 Funk R J, Owen-Smith J. A dynamic network measure of technological change[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(3): 791-817.
29 Della Malva A, Kelchtermans S, Leten B, et al. Basic science as a prescription for breakthrough inventions in the pharmaceutical industry[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2015, 40(4): 670-695.
30 Meyer M. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(3): 409-434.
31 Carpenter M P, Cooper M, Narin F. Linkage between basic research literature and patents[J]. Research Management, 1980, 23(2): 30-35.
32 Qu Z, Zhang S S. References to literature from the business sector in patent documents: a case study of charging technologies for electric vehicles[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 124(2): 867-886.
33 刘佳, 钟永恒, 赵展一, 等. 基础研究对中国上市公司技术创新的作用研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(4): 33-42, 73.
34 Bassecoulard E, Zitt M. Patents and publications[M]// Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht: Spring, 2004: 665-694.
35 Xu H Y, Winnink J, Yue Z H, et al. Topic-linked innovation paths in science and technology[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2020, 14(2): 101014.
36 Chen X, Ye P F, Huang L, et al. Exploring science-technology linkages: a deep learning-empowered solution[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2023, 60(2): 103255.
37 Gittelman M, Kogut B. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns[J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(4): 366-382.
38 Breschi S, Catalini C. Tracing the links between science and technology: an exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(1): 14-26.
39 Iwasaki A. Why we need to increase diversity in the immunology research community[J]. Nature Immunology, 2019, 20(9): 1085-1088.
40 Xu S, Li L, An X. Do academic inventors have diverse interests?[J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128(2): 1023-1053.
41 Ren H, Gray B, Harrison D A. Triggering faultline effects in teams: the importance of bridging friendship ties and breaching animosity ties[J]. Organization Science, 2015, 26(2): 390-404.
42 何劲, 关鹏, 王曰芬. 作者-主题关联的学科知识网络构建与演化分析[J]. 情报科学, 2019, 37(1): 56-62, 67.
43 Mansfield E. Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1995, 77(1): 55-65.
44 王诗炜, 陈春. 基于科学论文和技术专利关联关系识别潜在知识发现方法研究综述[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(7): 18-31.
45 Alvial-Palavicino C, Konrad K. The rise of graphene expectations: anticipatory practices in emergent nanotechnologies[J]. Futures, 2019, 109: 192-202.
46 Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films[J]. Science, 2004, 306(5696): 666-669.
47 Wagner S, Wakeman S. What do patent-based measures tell us about product commercialization? Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(5): 1091-1102.
48 Rosen-Zvi M, Chemudugunta C, Griffiths T, et al. Learning author-topic models from text corpora[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2010, 28(1): Article No.4.
49 Teh Y W, Jordan M I, Beal M J, et al. Hierarchical Dirichlet processes[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2006, 101(476): 1566-1581.
50 徐红姣, 曾文, 张运良. 基于Word2Vec的论文和专利主题关联演化分析方法研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(12): 36-42.
51 Leydesdorff L, Wagner C S, Bornmann L. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 255-269.
52 张彪, 董坤, 田常伟, 等. “双链”融合视角下关键核心技术分析框架及应用研究——以山东省区块链产业为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(11): 133-142.
53 李莉, 彭现科, 张艳芳, 等. 中国石墨烯产业创新政策分析及建议[J]. 技术经济, 2023, 42(11): 37-46.
54 Stokes D E. Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation[M]. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1997.
55 Liu J W, Gong X Y, Xu S, et al. Understanding the relationship between team diversity and the innovative performance in research teams using decision tree algorithms: evidence from artificial intelligence[J]. Scientometrics, 2024, 129(12): 7805-7831.
56 曾德明, 赵文静, 文金艳. 外部科学知识获取与企业技术创新——桥接科学家的调节作用[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(5): 109-117.
57 Wu L F, Wang D S, Evans J A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7744): 378-382.