技术融合机会识别研究：关系嵌入和结构嵌入的综合考量

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2025.10.008

情报学报

2025, Vol. 44

Issue (10): 1315-1328 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2025.10.008

情报技术与应用

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

技术融合机会识别研究：关系嵌入和结构嵌入的综合考量

赵又霖^1,2, 顾陈娅¹, 王嘉杰^2,3, 王月妹¹, 石燕青⁴, 封丽⁵

1.河海大学商学院，南京 211100
2.南京大学信息管理学院，南京 210023
3.南京大学数据智能与交叉创新实验室，南京 210023
4.南京农业大学信息管理学院，南京 210095
5.河海大学图书馆，南京 211100

Identification of Opportunities for Technological Fusion: Comprehensive Consideration of Relational and Structural Embedding

Zhao Youlin^1,2, Gu Chenya¹, Wang Jiajie^2,3, Wang Yuemei¹, Shi Yanqing⁴, Feng Li⁵

1.Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100
2.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
3.Laboratory of Data Intelligence and Interdisciplinary Innovation, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
4.College of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095
5.Hohai University Library, Nanjing 211100

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (1503 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要随着科技飞速发展和学科融合加深，技术创新越发依赖跨领域知识的深度融合。现有技术融合机会识别研究对技术融合程度较高的领域关注较少，未考虑过多弱关系对该领域知识融合创新的反作用，也缺少对不同网络位置节点在技术融合创新中作用的考量。对此，本文引入网络嵌入性理论构建模型，从技术融合程度较高的领域中识别技术融合机会。网络嵌入性理论中的关系嵌入关注关系的强弱特性，结构嵌入强调节点的位置特性。首先，本文提出的模型基于关系嵌入构建技术融合路径，将引证关系划分为具有不同强弱特征的四个象限，两两组合并分别构建知识网络，以技术融合潜能高的知识网络为已有的技术融合路径。其次，基于此技术融合路径和结构嵌入识别技术融合机会，以结构洞和中心位置的节点为媒介识别尚未建立连接且跨领域的知识组合，计算其融合价值，从中筛选技术融合机会。最后，在具有多元融合特征的高光谱成像领域进行实证研究，结果表明，相比于主流模型，本文模型识别准确度更高，识别内容的深度和广度均更优，有助于把握未来的技术融合方向。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	赵又霖
	顾陈娅
	王嘉杰
	王月妹
	石燕青
	封丽

关键词 ：技术融合机会, 网络嵌入性, 关系嵌入, 结构嵌入, 高光谱成像

收稿日期: 2024-11-01

基金资助:国家社会科学基金重大项目“前沿交叉领域识别与融合创新路径预测方法研究”（23&ZD225）。

作者简介: 赵又霖，1986年生，博士，副教授，博士生导师，主要研究领域为健康信息学、知识组织和复杂网络，E-mail：sobzyl@hhu.edu.cn；顾陈娅，2002年生，硕士研究生，主要研究领域为知识组织、复杂网络；王嘉杰，2000年生，博士研究生，主要研究领域为产业创新和复杂网络；王月妹，2001年生，硕士研究生，主要研究领域为科技创新；石燕青，1989年生，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，主要研究领域为复杂网络分析；封丽，1982年生，图书馆馆员，讲师，主要研究领域为知识组织和科技创新；

引用本文:

赵又霖, 顾陈娅, 王嘉杰, 王月妹, 石燕青, 封丽. 技术融合机会识别研究：关系嵌入和结构嵌入的综合考量[J]. 情报学报, 2025, 44(10): 1315-1328.
Zhao Youlin, Gu Chenya, Wang Jiajie, Wang Yuemei, Shi Yanqing, Feng Li. Identification of Opportunities for Technological Fusion: Comprehensive Consideration of Relational and Structural Embedding. 情报学报, 2025, 44(10): 1315-1328.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2025.10.008 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2025/V44/I10/1315

1 Schwartz P. Technological innovation opportunities[J]. Computers and People, 1974, 23(5): 33-33.
2 Olsson O. Technological opportunity and growth[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2005, 10(1): 31-57.
3 Jeong S, Lee S. What drives technology convergence? Exploring the influence of technological and resource allocation contexts[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2015, 36: 78-96.
4 Morel P, Bier H. Disruptive technologies: the convergence of new paradigms in architecture[M]. Cham: Springer, 2023
5 Kodama F. Technology fusion and the new R&D[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1992: 70-78.
6 Wang X Z, Zhao Y J, Liu R, et al. Knowledge-transfer analysis based on co-citation clustering[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 97(3): 859-869.
7 Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005, 50(1): 100-130.
8 Gao Q, Jiang M. Exploring technology fusion by combining latent Dirichlet allocation with Doc2vec: a case of digital medicine and machine learning[J]. Scientometrics, 2024, 129(7): 4043-4070.
9 Karvonen M, K?ssi T. Patent citations as a tool for analysing the early stages of convergence[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013, 80(6): 1094-1107.
10 王艳, 苗红, 李欣, 等. 知识基因视角下的技术融合机会发现研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(7): 18-34.
11 任海英, 赵育慧, 于立婷. 基于知识网络的科学研究机会发现的机理和应用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(11): 89-95.
12 Zhou Y, Dong F, Kong D J, et al. Unfolding the convergence process of scientific knowledge for the early identification of emerging technologies[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 144: 205-220.
13 Lee D, Yoo C. Predicting a promising fusion technology in geoscience and mineral resources engineering using Korean patent data[J]. Geosystem Engineering, 2014, 17(1): 34-42.
14 Lee W S, Han E J, Sohn S Y. Predicting the pattern of technology convergence using big-data technology on large-scale triadic patents[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2015, 100: 317-329.
15 Park I, Yoon B. Technological opportunity discovery for technological convergence based on the prediction of technology knowledge flow in a citation network[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(4): 1199-1222.
16 娄岩, 杨培培, 黄鲁成, 等. 基于专利的技术融合测度方法——以信息技术与电动汽车技术的融合为例[J]. 现代情报, 2017, 37(8): 142-153.
17 韩燕, 彭爱东. 基于技术形成三要素的技术机会识别研究——以医疗服务机器人领域技术为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(5): 156-162.
18 Polanyi K. The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time[M]. Boston: Beacon Press, 1944.
19 Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. Journal of Economic Sociology, 2002, 3(3): 44-58.
20 Granovetter M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380.
21 Genius S K. Published literature and diffusion of medical innovation: exploring innovation generation[J]. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 2005, 29(1): 27-54.
22 林润辉. 网络组织与企业高成长[M]. 天津: 南开大学出版社, 2004.
23 边燕杰, 丘海雄. 企业的社会资本及其功效[J]. 中国社会科学, 2000(2): 87-99, 207.
24 Moran P. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(12): 1129-1151.
25 Koka B R, Prescott J E. Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(6): 639-661.
26 Burt R S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
27 叶琴, 曾刚. 不同知识基础产业创新网络与创新绩效比较——以中国生物医药产业与节能环保产业为例[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1235-1244.
28 Nowiński W, Rialp A. The impact of social networks on perceptions of international opportunities[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2016, 54(2): 445-461.
29 Grunwald R, Kieser A. Learning to reduce interorganizational learning: an analysis of architectural product innovation in strategic alliances[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2007, 24(4): 369-391.
30 Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(1): 35-67.
31 Burt R S. The network structure of social capital[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2000, 22: 345-423.
32 马荣康. 基于马尔可夫链的中外专利布局演变特征比较分析——IPC小类层面的证据[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(9): 73-86.
33 Aharonson B S, Schilling M A. Mapping the technological landscape: measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(1): 81-96.
34 向姝璇, 李睿. 基于专利文献整体相似度计算的竞争对手发现——以5G领域为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(5): 100-105.
35 Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K, et al. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 4171-4186.
36 Xiong Y J, Feng Y K, Wu H, et al. Fusing label embedding into BERT: an efficient improvement for text classification[C]// Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021: 1743-1750.
37 Jenks G F. The data model concept in statistical mapping[M]// International Yearbook of Cartography. London: George Philip and Son Limited, 1967: 186-190.
38 MacQueen J. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations[C]// Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967: 281-297.
39 翟东升, 蔡力伟, 张杰, 等. 基于专利的技术融合创新轨道识别模型研究——以云计算技术为例[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(4): 352-360.
40 Borgatti S P, Mehra A, Brass D J, et al. Network analysis in the social sciences[J]. Science, 2009, 323(5916): 892-895.
41 刘军. 整体网分析: UCINET软件实用指南[M]. 上海: 格致出版社, 上海人民出版社, 2009: 126-136.
42 Freeman L C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness[J]. Sociometry, 1977, 40(1): 35-41.
43 Duysters G, Hagedoorn J. Technological convergence in the IT industry: the role of strategic technology alliances and technological competencies[J]. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1998, 5(3): 355-368.
44 Borés C, Saurina C, Torres R. Technological convergence: a strategic perspective[J]. Technovation, 2003, 23(1): 1-13.
45 慎金花, 闫倩倩, 孙乔宣, 等. 基于专利数据挖掘的技术融合识别与技术机会预测研究——以电动汽车产业为例[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(10): 95-106.
46 Caviggioli F. Technology fusion: identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data[J]. Technovation, 2016, 55/56: 22-32.
47 Levenson R M, Hoyt C C. Spectral imaging and microscopy[J]. American Laboratory, 2000, 32(22): 26-33.
48 Mao J H, Zhao H Q, Xie Y, et al. Fast and nondestructive proximate analysis of coal from hyperspectral images with machine learning and combined spectra-texture features[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(17): 7920.
49 王宏起, 夏凡, 王珊珊. 新兴产业技术融合方向预测: 方法及实证[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(6): 1009-1017, 1075.