突破式创新发明人的合作倾向

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.03.001

情报学报

2024, Vol. 43

Issue (3): 251-260 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.03.001

情报理论与方法

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

突破式创新发明人的合作倾向

余博文, 刘向

华中师范大学信息管理学院，武汉 430079

Cooperation Tendencies of Breakthrough Innovation Inventors

Yu Bowen, Liu Xiang

School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (9)

全文: PDF (1825 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要突破式技术创新是推动产业升级的关键，研发合作是实现技术创新的有效途径。作为技术创新的自然延伸，对突破式创新发明人的合作倾向问题进行分析，有助于更好地理解突破式与持续式创新的区别与联系，也有助于推动发明人合作关系的合理构建与研发团队的培育。首先，本文定义了突破式创新发明人的度量方法；其次，使用专利引用数据构建发明人合作网络；最后，基于网络零模型的方法分析和验证了突破式创新发明人的合作倾向。研究结果表明，发明人合作网络表现出度相关性与同配性，突破式创新发明人倾向于和突破式创新发明人合作，并且随着时间推移，突破式创新发明人与突破式创新发明人的合作倾向越来越显著。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	余博文
	刘向

关键词 ：专利分析, 突破式创新, 持续式创新, 合作网络, 合作倾向

收稿日期: 2023-03-06

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目“专利引证网络中创新节点的浮现与长期演化研究”（71673106）。

作者简介: 余博文，男，1997年生，硕士研究生，研究方向为知识网络与数据挖掘；刘向，通信作者，男，1983年生，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，研究方向为知识工程与大数据，E-mail：xiangliu@ccnu.edu.cn；

引用本文:

余博文, 刘向. 突破式创新发明人的合作倾向[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43(3): 251-260.
Yu Bowen, Liu Xiang. Cooperation Tendencies of Breakthrough Innovation Inventors. 情报学报, 2024, 43(3): 251-260.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.03.001 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2024/V43/I3/251

1 Chen W, Qu H, Chi K. Partner selection in China interorganizational patent cooperation network based on link prediction approaches[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(2): 1003.
2 陈劲, 阳银娟. 协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(2): 161-164.
3 鲁若愚, 周阳, 丁奕文, 等. 企业创新网络: 溯源、演化与研究展望[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(1): 217-233, 14.
4 Hur W, Park J. Network patterns of inventor collaboration and their effects on innovation outputs[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(4): 295.
5 Wang J, Suri S, Watts D J. Cooperation and assortativity with dynamic partner updating[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(36): 14363-14368.
6 Chodrow P S. Configuration models of random hypergraphs[J]. Journal of Complex Networks, 2020, 8(3): cnaa018.
7 Zeng A, Shen Z S, Zhou J L, et al. The science of science: from the perspective of complex systems[J]. Physics Reports, 2017, 714/715: 1-73.
8 Wang W, Yu S, Bekele T M, et al. Scientific collaboration patterns vary with scholars’ academic ages[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(1): 329-343.
9 Guan J C, Yan Y, Zhang J J. How do collaborative features affect scientific output? Evidences from wind power field[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1): 333-355.
10 孙锐. 新时代人才强国战略实施若干问题研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2022(8): 1-11.
11 Christensen C M. The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail[M]. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
12 Voss G B, Voss Z G. Strategic orientation and firm performance in an artistic environment[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2000, 64(1): 67-83.
13 Adner R. When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(8): 667-688.
14 Govindarajan V, Kopalle P K. Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2): 189-199.
15 Menguc B, Auh S, Yannopoulos P. Customer and supplier involvement in design: the moderating role of incremental and radical innovation capability[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(2): 313-328.
16 Zucker L G, Darby M R, Armstrong J S. Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(1): 138-153.
17 Menon C. Stars and comets: an exploration of the patent universe[R]. Bank of Italy, 2011: Number 784.
18 Schiffauerova A, Beaudry C. Star scientists and their positions in the Canadian biotechnology network[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2011, 20(4): 343-366.
19 刘向, 刘香, 余博文. 创新二重性视角下明星发明人类型的早期识别[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(2): 119-128.
20 Almeida P, Dokko G, Rosenkopf L. Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability?[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(2): 301-315.
21 Beaudry C, Schiffauerova A. Impacts of collaboration and network indicators on patent quality: the case of Canadian nanotechnology innovation[J]. European Management Journal, 2011, 29(5): 362-376.
22 Wu L F, Wang D S, Evans J A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7744): 378-382.
23 王宇开, 杨中楷, 王贤文, 等. 专利发明人合作存在性别偏好吗?[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(3): 415-422.
24 Azagra-Caro J M. What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of university-industry interaction[J]. Technovation, 2007, 27(11): 704-715.
25 D’Este P, Patel P. University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(9): 1295-1313.
26 Funk R J, Owen-Smith J. A dynamic network measure of technological change[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(3): 791-817.
27 Chen J Y, Shao D A, Fan S K. Destabilization and consolidation: conceptualizing, measuring, and validating the dual characteristics of technology[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(1): 104115.
28 Park M, Leahey E, Funk R J. Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time[J]. Nature, 2023, 613(7942): 138-144.
29 Lee K, Lee S. Patterns of technological innovation and evolution in the energy sector: a patent-based approach[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 59: 415-432.
30 Yayavaram S, Chen W R. Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: the moderating role of technological complexity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(3): 377-396.
31 汪小帆, 李翔, 陈关荣. 复杂网络理论及其应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006.
32 Gong X, Sanfey A G. Social rank and social cooperation: impact of social comparison processes on cooperative decision-making[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(4): e0175472.
33 陈泉, 杨建梅, 曾进群. 零模型及其在复杂网络研究中的应用[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2013, 10(1): 8-17.