科学文献网络中的引文扩散——以<bold>2011</bold>年诺贝尔化学奖获奖论文为例

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2020.03.004

情报学报

2020, Vol. 39

Issue (3): 259-273 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2020.03.004

专题约稿

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

科学文献网络中的引文扩散——以2011年诺贝尔化学奖获奖论文为例

闵超¹, 张帅², 孙建军¹

1.南京大学信息管理学院，南京 210023
2.新南威尔士大学计算机科学与工程学院，悉尼 2052

Citation Diffusion in the Networks of Scientific Publications: A Case Study on the 2011 Nobel Chemistry Prizewinning Paper

Min Chao¹, Zhang Shuai², Sun Jianjun¹

1.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
2.School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (3769 KB) HTML (172 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要科学知识借助引用关系发生动态扩散，客观记录科学发展与演化的轨迹。由于知识之间存在千丝万缕的联系，以孤立的观点看待科学知识的影响与价值往往得到的是片面的感观。本文从联系的视角观察科学知识产出，尝试通过被引、引用、文献耦合与共被引等文献关系为单篇论著构建引文扩散网络，探讨“文献嵌入网络”的概念、测度方式及其在引文扩散过程中起到的特殊作用。案例分析显示，科学知识的形成相伴于科学知识网络的发展，同时也受到这个网络的影响：科学知识向科学领域的扩散，遵循从核心领域向周边领域的扩散模式；施引文献可以揭示目标文献中没有显式呈现的信息；四种文献关系之间可能存在相当程度的重合，引文扩散过程显示出知识的“黏滞性”与非常明显的“小世界”特征。对科学产出的扩散网络进行量化有助于为全面评价其价值提供更多客观依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	闵超
	张帅
	孙建军

关键词 ：引文扩散, 施引文献, 扩散网络, 科学评估

收稿日期: 2019-05-14

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目“引文扩散理论及实证研究”（71874077），“引文模式视角下的科学突破研究”（71904081）；教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目“施引群体视角的科学产出评价方法研究”（19YJC870017）。

作者简介: 闵超，男，1990年生，助理研究员，主要研究方向为科学计量、创新扩散、网络科学等

引用本文:

闵超, 张帅, 孙建军. 科学文献网络中的引文扩散——以2011年诺贝尔化学奖获奖论文为例[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(3): 259-273.
Min Chao, Zhang Shuai, Sun Jianjun. Citation Diffusion in the Networks of Scientific Publications: A Case Study on the 2011 Nobel Chemistry Prizewinning Paper. 情报学报, 2020, 39(3): 259-273.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2020.03.004 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I3/259

1 闵超, YingDing, 李江, 等. 单篇论著的引文扩散[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(4): 341-350.
2 MinC, DingY, LiJ, et al. Innovation or imitation: The diffusion of citations[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(10): 1271-1282.
3 WuL F, WangD S, EvansJ A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7744): 378-382.
4 RogersE M. Diffusion of innovations[M]. Simon and Schuster, 2010.
5 刘浏, 王东波. 引用内容分析研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(6): 637-643.
6 van LeeuwenT, TijssenR. Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: Analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows[J]. Research Evaluation, 2000, 9(3): 183-187.
7 RiniaE J, van LeeuwenT N, BruinsE, et al. Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(1): 293-309.
8 ShiX L, TsengB, AdamicL A. Information diffusion in computer science citation networks[C]// Proceedings of the 3rd International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2009, 1093: 123-142.
9 CaseD O, HigginsG M. How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000, 51(7): 635-645.
10 Bar-IlanJ. Citations to the “introduction to informetrics” indexed by WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3): 495-506.
11 KoushaK, ThelwallM, RezaieS. Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(11): 2147-2164.
12 宋歌. 学术创新的扩散过程研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(1): 62-75.
13 梁永霞, 李正风, 汪海波. 知识生态系统微观机理探析——以DNA双螺旋结构发现的引文网络为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012, 35(9): 18-21, 12.
14 van RaanA F J. Sleeping Beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3): 467-472.
15 CostasR, van LeeuwenT N, van RaanA F J. Is scientific literature subject to a ‘Sell-By-Date’? A general methodology to analyze the ‘durability’ of scientific documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(2): 329-339.
16 LiJ, ShiD B, ZhaoS X, et al. A study of the “heartbeat spectra” for “sleeping beauties”[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(3): 493-502.
17 MinC, SunJ J, PeiL, et al. Measuring delayed recognition for papers: Uneven weighted summation and total citations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(4): 1153-1165.
18 杜建, 武夷山. 基于被引速率指标识别睡美人文献及其“王子”——以2014年诺贝尔化学奖得主Stefan Hell的睡美人文献为例[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(5): 508-521.
19 WangD S, SongC M, BarabásiA L. Quantifying long-term scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6154): 127-132.
20 LiuY X, RousseauR. Towards a representation of diffusion and interaction of scientific ideas: The case of fiber optics communication[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2012, 48(4): 791-801.
21 王亮, 张庆普, 于光, 等. 基于引文网络的知识扩散速度测度研究[J]. 情报学报, 2014, 33(1): 33-44.
22 ValenteT W. Network models of the diffusion of innovations[M]. New York: Hampton Press, 1995.
23 SchellingT C. Micromotives and macrobehavior[M]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1978.
24 BurtR S. The network structure of social capital[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2000, 22: 345-423.
25 GranovetterM S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380.
26 HolmesT J. The diffusion of wal-mart and economies of density[J]. Econometrica, 2011, 79(1): 253-302.
27 KesslerM M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers[J]. American Documentation, 1963, 14(1): 10-25.
28 SmallH. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, 24(4): 265-269.
29 BoyackK W, KlavansR. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(12): 2389-2404.
30 YanE J, DingY. Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(7): 1313-1326.
31 ShiX L, LeskovecJ, McFarlandD A. Citing for high impact[C]// Proceedings of the 10th Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 49-58.
32 SinatraR, DevilleP, SzellM, et al. A century of physics[J]. Nature Physics, 2015, 11(10): 791-796.
33 RadevD R, JosephM T, GibsonB, et al. A bibliometric and network analysis of the field of computational linguistics[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(3): 683-706.
34 HummonN P, DereianP. Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory[J]. Social Networks, 1989, 11(1): 39-63.
35 LiuJ S, KuanC H. A new approach for main path analysis: Decay in knowledge diffusion[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(2): 465-476.
36 KissI Z, BroomM, CrazeP G, et al. Can epidemic models describe the diffusion of topics across disciplines?[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(1): 74-82.
37 GaoX, GuanJ C. Networks of scientific journals: An exploration of Chinese patent data[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(1): 283-302.
38 RosasS R, SchoutenJ T, CopeM T, et al. Modeling the dissemination and uptake of clinical trials results[J]. Research Evaluation, 2013, 22(3): 179-186.
39 EverettM, BorgattiS P. Ego network betweenness[J]. Social Networks, 2005, 27(1): 31-38.
40 GolosovskyM, SolomonS. Growing complex network of citations of scientific papers: Modeling and measurements[J]. Physical Review E, 2017, 95: 012324.
41 BlondelV D, GuillaumeJ L, LambiotteR, et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008, 2008(10): P10008.
42 WattsD J, StrogatzS H. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440-442.
43 ErdosP, RényiA. On the evolution of random graphs[J]. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1960, 5(1): 17-60.
44 ShechtmanD, BlechI, GratiasD, et al. Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1984, 53(20): 1951-1953.
45 LevineD, SteinhardtP J. Quasicrystals: A new class of ordered structures[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1984, 53(26): 2477-2480.
46 De Solla PriceD J. Little science, big science[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.
47 WuchtyS, JonesB F, UzziB. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5827): 1036-1039.
48 Milojevi?S. Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(11): 3984-3989.