引文波峰的量化与分布探究

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2019.07.004

情报学报

2019, Vol. 38

Issue (7): 697-708 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2019.07.004

情报理论与应用

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

引文波峰的量化与分布探究

李凌英, 闵超, 孙建军

南京大学信息管理学院，南京 210023

On the Quantification and Distribution of Citation Peaks

Li Lingying, Min Chao, and Sun

School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (4438 KB) HTML (158 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要引文是科学知识的重要连接，引文波峰反映了引文扩散过程中最具影响力的阶段。本文希望借助引文波峰分布情况来深入了解科学引文的动态扩散过程。首先明确引文波峰的定义，并构建详细的量化方法，对美国物理学会的期刊文献进行波峰识别，根据识别的波峰总结出六种引文曲线类型，最后基于文献的波峰数量、波峰位置、波峰间隔等特征探究波峰分布差异。发现大部分文献有且只有一个波峰，同时也存在两个或多个波峰的情况。文献一般在发表后初期到达首次波峰与最高峰（主要是发表后0~5年、第1~2年最为突出）。首次波峰的位置分布与最高峰位置分布显著正相关，高被引文献更易在发表初期达到首次波峰。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李凌英
	闵超
	孙建军

关键词 ：引文波峰, 波峰分布, 引文曲线, 引文扩散

收稿日期: 2018-12-04

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目“引文扩散理论及实证研究”（71874077）；教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“施引群体视角的科学产出评价方法研究 ”（19YJC870017）。

作者简介: 李凌英，女，1995年生，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为科学计量

引用本文:

李凌英, 闵超, 孙建军. 引文波峰的量化与分布探究[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(7): 697-708.
Li Lingying, Min Chao, and Sun. On the Quantification and Distribution of Citation Peaks. 情报学报, 2019, 38(7): 697-708.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2019.07.004 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2019/V38/I7/697

1 GarfieldE. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J]. Science, 1972, 178(4060): 471-479.
2 MohlerB A. Citation analysis as an assessment tool[J]. Science & Technology Libraries, 2005, 25(4): 57-64.
3 MoedH F. Citation analysis in research evaluation[J]. Information Science and Knowledge Management, 2011, 57(1): 13-18.
4 GarfieldE. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor[J]. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2006, 295(1): 90-93.
5 CroninB, MehoL. Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(9): 1275-1278.
6 郭倩影, 杜建, 唐小利. 学术传承意义上“学术链”的识别方法探讨——以2014年诺贝尔化学奖为例[J]. 情报资料工作, 2018(2): 29-36.
7 MinC, DingY, LiJ, et al. Innovation or imitation: The diffusion of citations[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(10): 1271-1282.
8 CanoV, LindN C. Citation life cycles of ten citation classics[J]. Scientometrics, 1991, 22(2): 297-312.
9 BaumgartnerS E, LeydesdorffL. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) of citations in scholarly literature: Dynamic qualities of “transient” and “sticky knowledge claims”[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(4): 797-811.
10 LiJ, YeF Y. A probe into the citation patterns of high-quality and high-impact publications[J]. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 2014, 19(2): 17-33.
11 van RaanA F J. Sleeping beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3): 467-472.
12 KeQ, FerraraE, RadicchiF, et al. Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(24): 7426-7431.
13 LiJ, ShiD B, ZhaoS X, et al. A study of the “heartbeat spectra” for “sleeping beauties”[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(3): 493-502.
14 LiJ, YeF Y. Distinguishing sleeping beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 108(2): 821-828.
15 闵超, YingDing, 李江, 等. 单篇论著的引文扩散[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(4): 341-350.
16 ColavizzaG, FranceschetM. Clustering citation histories in the Physical Review[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(4): 1037-1051.
17 BornmannL, YeA, YeF. Identifying landmark publications in the long run using field-normalized citation data[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2018, 74(2): 278-288.
18 HeidornP B. Shedding light on the dark data in the long tail of science[J]. Library Trends, 2008, 57(2): 280-299.
19 PeruzzoF. Sleeping beauties and the citation dynamics in the network of scientific papers[EB/OL]. [2018-11-16]. http://tesi.cab.unipd.it/50039/1/Peruzzo_Fabio.pdf.
20 杜建, 武夷山. 一个用于识别睡美人文献的新的无参数指标——基于“Science”和“Nature”上睡美人文献的验证[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(2): 19-25.
21 SunJ J, MinC, LiJ. A vector for measuring obsolescence of scientific articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(2): 745-757.
22 YeF Y, BornmannL. “Smart girls” versus “sleeping beauties” in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(3): 359-367.
23 EggheL, BornmannL, GunsR. A proposal for a first-citation-speed-index[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(1): 181-186.
24 RiniaE J, Van LeeuwenT N, BruinsE E W, et al. Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(1): 293-309.
25 Gl?nzelW, RousseauR, ZhangL. A visual representation of relative first-citation times[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(7): 1420-1425.
26 ChakrabortyT, KumarS, GoyalP, et al. Towards a stratified learning approach to predict future citation counts[C]//Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2014: 351-360.
27 GarnerJ, PorterA L, NewmanN C. Distance and velocity measures: using citations to determine breadth and speed of research impact[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(3): 687-703.
28 Della SalaS, GrafmanJ. Five-year impact factor[J]. Cortex, 2009, 45(8): 911.
29 LiuX L, GaiS S, ZhangS L, et al. An analysis of peer-reviewed scores and impact factors with different citation time windows: A case study of 28 ophthalmologic journals[J]. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(8): e135583.
30 赵星. JCR五年期影响因子探析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2010, 36(3): 120-126.
31 李江, 姜明利, 李玥婷. 引文曲线的分析框架研究——以诺贝尔奖得主的引文曲线为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(2): 41-49.
32 LiJ. Citation curves of “all-elements-sleeping-beauties”: “flash in the pan” first and then “delayed recognition”[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(2): 595-601.
33 BouabidH. Revisiting citation aging: a model for citation distribution and life-cycle prediction[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1): 199-211.
34 王海燕, 马峥, 潘云涛, 等. 高被引论文与“睡美人”论文引用曲线及影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(16): 83-89.
35 PichappanP, PonnuduraiR. Skewness in citation peak[C]// Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Colima: University of Colima, 1999.
36 SinatraR, WangD S, DevilleP, et al. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact[J]. Science, 2016, 354(6312): aaf5239.
37 ZhaoS X, LiJ. Citation peaks in modern science: 1900-2010[J]. Current Science, 2015, 109(9): 1523-1525.
38 PonomarevI V, WilliamsD E, HackettC J, et al. Predicting highly cited papers: A method for early detection of candidate breakthroughs[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 81: 49-55.
39 LachanceC, LariviereV. On the citation lifecycle of papers with delayed recognition[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(4): 863-872.
40 YoonS J, YoonD Y, LeeH J, et al. Distribution of citations received by scientific papers published in the imaging literature from 2001 to 2010: Decreasing inequality and polarization[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2017, 209(2): 248-254.
41 MinC, SunJ J, PeiL, et al. Measuring delayed recognition for papers: Uneven weighted summation and total citations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(4): 1153-1165.
42 LiuL, WangY, SinatraR, et al. Hot streaks in artistic, cultural, and scientific careers[J]. Nature, 2018, 559(7714): 396-399.
43 De Solla PriceD. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1976, 27(5): 292-306.
44 LariviereV, GingrasY. The impact factor’s Matthew effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(2): 424-427.
45 WangD S, SongC M, BarabasiA. Quantifying long-term scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6154): 127-132.
46 BornmannL, MutzR. Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(1): 228-230.
47 BianconiG, BarabásiA L. Bose-Einstein condensation in complex networks[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 86(24): 5632-5635.
48 BarabásiA. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509-512.
49 NashJ R, AraújoR J, ShidelerG S. Contributing factors to long-term citation count in marine and freshwater biology articles[J]. Learned Publishing, 2018, 31(2): 131-139.
50 StegehuisC, LitvakN, WaltmanL. Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(3): 642-657.
51 SternD I. High-ranked social science journal articles can be identified from early citation information[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(11): e112520.
52 李正风, 梁永霞. 引文动机的生态学解释[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(4): 487-494.
53 赵蓉英, 曾宪琴, 陈必坤. 全文本引文分析——引文分析的新发展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(9): 129-135.