引文起飞的定义与量化方法研究

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2019.08.003

情报学报

2019, Vol. 38

Issue (8): 786-797 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2019.08.003

情报理论与应用

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

引文起飞的定义与量化方法研究

张靖雯, 孙建军, 闵超

南京大学信息管理学院，南京 210023

Definitionand Quantification Methods of Citation Takeoff

Zhang Jingwen, Sun Jianjun, Min Chao

School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (2752 KB) HTML (192 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要在引文动态进程中，引文起飞是揭示学术成果被承认和关注的一个关键节点。在前期工作基础上，本文对引文起飞作进一步探索，提出人为参数、年度引文增长量K、年度引文增长率K、年均被引增长量M、年均被引增长率M_r五种量化识别“起飞”的候选方法。选择美国物理学会（American Physical Society，APS）引文数据进行实证检验，利用被引速率将引文曲线分为四类，进行引文起飞的识别。最后从识别效果及正确率等方面比较各方法优缺点，给出具体使用建议。人为参数能准确识别引文曲线中的起飞时点与引文的二次或多次起飞，但存在部分文献无法识别的现象。延迟承认型和厚积薄发型文献可通过人为参数和年度引文增长率K_r相结合的方法对进行识别，年均被引增长率M_r方法在领先优势型和昙花一现型文献中识别正确率较高。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张靖雯
	孙建军
	闵超

关键词 ：引文起飞, 引文曲线, 被引速率, 引文动态, 引文扩散

收稿日期: 2018-12-04

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目“引文扩散理论及实证研究”（71874077）。

作者简介: 张靖雯，女，1995年生，硕士研究生，研究方向为科学计量、引文扩散

引用本文:

张靖雯, 孙建军, 闵超. 引文起飞的定义与量化方法研究[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(8): 786-797.
Zhang Jingwen, Sun Jianjun, Min Chao. Definitionand Quantification Methods of Citation Takeoff. 情报学报, 2019, 38(8): 786-797.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2019.08.003 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2019/V38/I8/786

1 尚海茹, 冯长根, 孙良. 用学术影响力评价学术论文——兼论关于学术传承效应和长期引用的两个新指标[J]. 科学通报, 2016, 61(26): 2853-2860.
2 胡明铭, 黄菊芳. 同行评议研究综述[J]. 中国科学基金, 2005, 19(4): 251-253.
3 AminM, MabeM A. Impact factors: Use and abuse[J]. Medicina, 2003, 63(4): 347-354.
4 SunX L, KaurJ, Milojevi?S, et al. Social dynamics of science[J]. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3: 1069.
5 GuimeraR. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance[J]. Science, 2005, 308(5722): 697-702.
6 WallaceM L, LarivièreV, GingrasY. A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices[J]. PLoS ONE, 2012,7(3): e33339.
7 HirschJ E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.
8 GarfieldE. Journal impact factor: A brief review[J]. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1999, 161(8): 979-980.
9 GarfieldE. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor[J]. JAMA, 2006,295(1): 90-93.
10 CroninB, MehoL. Using the h-index to rank influential information scientistss[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(9): 1275-1278.
11 杜建, 武夷山. 文献引文轨迹:分类及测度[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(7): 52-58.
12 MinC, DingY, LiJ, et al. Innovation or imitation: The diffusion of citations[J]. Journal of The Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(10): 1271-1282.
13 HurdJ M. The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1985, 21(4): 380.
14 De Solla PriceD. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1976, 27(5): 292-306.
15 GolderP N, TellisG J. Will it ever fly? Modeling the takeoff of really new consumer durables[J]. Marketing Science, 1997, 16(3): 256-270.
16 闵超, YingDing, 李江, 等. 单篇论著的引文扩散[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(4): 341-350.
17 van RaanA F J. Sleeping Beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3): 467-472.
18 KeQ, FerraraE, RadicchiF, et al. Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(24): 7426-7431.
19 LiJ, ShiD B. Sleeping beauties in genius work: When were they awakened?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(2): 432-440.
20 CostasR, van LeeuwenT N, van RaanA F J. Is scientific literature subject to a ‘Sell-By-Date’? A general methodology to analyze the ‘durability’ of scientific documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(2): 329-339.
21 Gl?nzelW, SchlemmerB, ThijsB. Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(3): 571-586.
22 AgarwalR, BayusB L. The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(8): 1024-1041.
23 TellisG J, StremerschS, YinE. The international takeoff of new products: The role of economics, culture, and country innovativeness[J]. Marketing Science, 2003, 22(2): 188-208.
24 GarberT, GoldenbergJ, LibaiB, et al. From density to destiny: Using spatial dimension of sales data for early prediction of new product success[J]. Marketing Science, 2004, 23(3): 419-428.
25 ChandrasekaranD, TellisG J. Global takeoff of new products: Culture, wealth, or vanishing differences?[J]. Marketing Science, 2008, 27(5): 844-860.
26 HohnischM, PittnauerS, StaufferD. A percolation-based model explaining delayed takeoff in new-product diffusion[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2008, 17(5): 1001-1017.
27 van EverdingenY, FokD, StremerschS. Modeling global spillover of new product takeoff[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2009, 46(5): 637-652.
28 AizenmanJ, SpiegelM M. Takeoffs[J]. Review of Development Economics, 2010, 14(2): 177-196.
29 李春发, 刘凯, 王晟锴. 基于Multi-Agent的政府干预下虚假舆情传播规律与控制决策[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(5): 53-59.
30 RednerS. Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review[J]. Physics Today, 2005, 58(6): 49-54.
31 CanoV, LindN C. Citation life cycles of ten citation classics[J]. Scientometrics, 1991, 22(2): 297-312.
32 EggheL, ravichandra raoI K. Citation age data and the obsolescence function: Fits and explanations[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1992, 28(2): 201-217.
33 PollmanT. Forgetting and the ageing of scientific publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2000, 47(1): 43-54.
34 AvramescuA. Actuality and obsolescence of scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1979, 30(5): 296-303.
35 BarberB. Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery[J]. Science, 1961, 134(3479): 596-602.
36 StentG S. Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery[J]. Scientific American, 1972, 227(6): 84-93.
37 WyattH V. Knowledge and prematurity: The journey from transformation to DNA[J]. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1975, 18(2): 149-156.
38 GarfieldE. More delayed recognition. 1. Examples from the genetics of color-blindness, the entropy of short-term-memory, phosphoinositides, and polymer rheology[J]. Current Contents, 1989, 38: 3-8.
39 ColeS. Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1970, 76(2): 286-306.
40 MinC, SunJ J, PeiL, et al. Measuring delayed recognition for papers: Uneven weighted summation and total citations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(4): 1153-1165.
41 AversaE S. Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging - A study of the working literature[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 7(3-6): 383-389.
42 Gl?nzelW. Seven myths in bibliometrics about facts and fiction in quantitative science studies[J]. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2008, 2(1): 9-17.
43 LiJ, ShiD B, ZhaoS X, et al. A study of the “heartbeat spectra” for “sleeping beauties”[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(3): 493-502.
44 WangJ. Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(3): 851-872.
45 杜建, 武夷山. 睡美人与王子文献的识别方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(19): 84-92.
46 Gl?nzelW, GarfieldE. The myth of delayed recognition: citation analysis demonstrates that premature discovery, while rare, does occur: Nearly all significant research is normally cited soon after publication[J]. The Scientist, 2004, 18(11): 8-9.
47 EomY H, FortunatoS. Characterizing and modeling citation dynamics[J]. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(9): e24926.
48 杜建, 武夷山. 基于被引速率指标识别睡美人文献及其“王子”——以2014年诺贝尔化学奖得主Stefan Hell的睡美人文献为例[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(5): 508-521.
49 李江, 姜明利, 李玥婷. 引文曲线的分析框架研究——以诺贝尔奖得主的引文曲线为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(2): 41-49.