|
|
|
| Metamodel Study of Knowledge-Organization-System Theory Integrating Multidisciplinary Theories |
| Zhai Kexin, Yuan Jingshu, Yuan Man |
| School of Computer & Information Technology, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing163318 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on literature review, most current studies pertaining to knowledge organization systems (KOS) focus primarily on the construction of domain-knowledge topic models, whereas few studies begin from the underlying fundamental theories to reveal the basic principles and operation mechanisms of KOSs. This results in inadequate guidance pertaining to the underlying methodology of KOS research and application, thus rendering it difficult to guarantee the quality and shareability of KOSs. Hence, this study first proposes a three-layer framework model that addresses the grammatical, semantic, and pragmatic aspects of KOSs. Based on this model, the operational mechanisms of the conceptualization process and the symbolic representation of knowledge semantics in knowledge organization are revealed. Second, by focusing on the semantic layer while integrating multidisciplinary theories, such as semantic triangulation, concepts, semiotics, and system theories, a theoretical metamodel of the knowledge-organization system is proposed, in addition to the method and process used for constructing KOSs in the domain. Finally, the feasibility of the theoretical metamodel and the KOS construction method and process is verified by considering knowledge-model construction in petroleum underground operations as the research object, thus providing a new scientific method for the high-quality and high-efficiency construction of KOSs in other fields.
|
|
Received: 11 January 2024
|
|
|
|
1 Hj?rland B. Semantics and knowledge organization[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2007, 41(1): 367-405.
2 Hodge G. Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries: beyond traditional authority files[M]. Washington, DC: The Council on Library and Information Resources, 2000.
3 Blumauer A, Pellegrini T. Semantic Web und semantische technologien: zentrale begriffe und unterscheidungen[M]// Semantic Web. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 9-25.
4 Mazzocchi F. Knowledge organization system (KOS): an introductory critical account[J]. Knowledge Organization, 2018, 45(1): 54-78.
5 Zeng M L. Knowledge organization systems (KOS)[J]. Knowledge Organization, 2008, 35(2/3): 160-182.
6 崔春, 毕强. 虚拟国际规范文档(VIAF)项目进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(6): 129-134.
7 Hj?rland B. Facet analysis: the logical approach to knowledge organization[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2013, 49(2): 545-557.
8 张云中, 柳迪. 面向同义词环的社会化标签同义关系发现研究[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(9): 23-29, 48.
9 范云满, 陈颖, 唐小利. 多来源机构规范文档的融合研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2024, 8(5): 29-37.
10 齐小英, 丁子仪, 杨海平. 多源数据融合的南海领域主题词表[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2022, 31(5): 82-94.
11 张前龙, 周永章, 虞鹏鹏, 等. 多层次矿床本体的构建及在知识图谱中的应用[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2024, 43(1): 211-217.
12 叶育鑫, 刘家文, 曾婉馨, 等. 基于本体指导的矿产预测知识图谱构建研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(4): 16-25.
13 冯秋睿, 赵汀, 刘超. 基于本体的三稀矿产知识图谱构建[J]. 中国矿业, 2024, 33(4): 79-88.
14 Gao S, Ren G Q, Li H J. Knowledge management in construction health and safety based on ontology modeling[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(17): 8574.
15 康宏宇, 李勤, 吴萌, 等. 黑色素瘤单病种本体构建研究[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2021, 42(12): 37-43.
16 陈业, 赵生辉. 融合HBIM和人文知识的古建筑知识本体构建[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2024, 44(9): 90-102.
17 周冬艳, 高鲁放, 吴艳芳, 等. 基于本体的青瓷知识图谱构建方法研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2024, 43(3): 91-100.
18 Dahlberg I. Knowledge organization: a new science?[J]. Knowledge Organization, 2006, 33(1): 11-19.
19 贾君枝, 崔西燕. 多元认识论协调下的知识组织系统构建[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(3): 163-169, 176.
20 曹思源, 马海云. 领域知识组织理论基础及方法分类简述[J]. 情报资料工作, 2021, 42(5): 14-22.
21 王一真. 基于系统科学原理的知识组织理论研究[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2014, 26(3): 73-76.
22 朱晓峰, 蒋旭牧, 张卫. 领域知识组织研究的历史演化与未来展望[J]. 情报资料工作, 2021, 42(5): 23-31.
23 Iamkhajornchai P, Manmart L. Developing framework of knowledge organization system for Thai cultural knowledge domain: a research proposal[C]// Proceedings of the 6th Asia Library and Information Research Group Workshop-in Collaboration with CiSAP, 2014.
24 张善庄, 刘怀亮, 赵舰波, 等. 领域顶层本体研究: 模型与构建方法[J]. 情报杂志, 2024, 43(7): 112-121.
25 曾文, 刘敏. 信息服务中的知识组织系统及应用研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2017(3): 51-55.
26 Wright S E. Typology for KRRs: knowledge representation resources[C/OL]// Proceedings of the 8th NKOS Workshop, (2008-09-11). https://nkos.dublincore.org/2008workshop/SueEllenWright.pdf.
27 Hj?rland B. Knowledge organization systems (KOS)[EB/OL]. (2008-02-29). http://www.iva.dk/bh/lifeboat_ko/CONCEPTS/know ledge_organization_systems.htm.
28 贾君枝, 崔西燕, 任明. 数据与知识双驱动的知识组织系统构建框架研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(10): 157-162.
29 王忠义, 彭思源, 夏立新. 跨学科知识组织的概念关联研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2022, 48(3): 43-62.
30 黄华军, 曾新红. 基于MediaWiki实现知识组织系统的语义在线维护——以ISO 5127术语国际标准为例[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2021(10): 25-30.
31 王知津, 赵梦菊. 论知识组织系统中的语义关系(上)[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2014(8): 65-69.
32 Green R, Bean C A, Myaeng S H. The semantics of relationships[J]. Information Science & Knowledge Management, 2002, 3(2): 325-327.
33 Br?scher M. Semantic relations in knowledge organization systems[J]. Knowledge Organization, 2014, 41(2): 175-180.
34 祁天娇, 冯惠玲. 档案数据化过程中语义组织的内涵、特点与原理解析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(9): 3-15.
35 陆丙甫. 从语义、语用看语法形式的实质[J]. 中国语文, 1998(5): 353-367.
36 Ogden C K, Richards I A. The meaning of meaning: a study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism[M]. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1927.
37 Yuan J S, Li H Q. Research on the standardization model of data semantics in the knowledge graph construction of Oil & Gas industry[J]. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2023, 84: 103705.
38 ISO. ISO 704: 2022Terminology work—principles and methods[S/OL]. (2022-07-21) [2024-08-29]. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:704:ed-4:v1:en.
39 Giunchiglia F, Dutta B, Maltese V, et al. A facet-based methodology for the construction of a large-scale geospatial ontology[J]. Journal on Data Semantics, 2012, 1(1): 57-73.
40 吴霞, 曾建勋, 吴雯娜. 汉语主题词表生物、医学、农业领域顶层本体语义类型框架研究[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(1): 94-101. |
|
|
|
