Representative Works in Science and Technology Evaluation: Concept, Connotation, and Characteristics
Zhang Zhen1,2, Xu Xiaoting1,2, Cheng Ying1,2
1.Laboratory of Data Intelligence and Interdisciplinary Innovation, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023 2.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
1 仲伟民. 关于人文社会科学学术评价的几个问题——从学术评价的实质性标准谈起[J]. 学术界, 2014(7): 41-52, 308. 2 叶继元. 有益遏制学术评价形式化数量化[N]. 中国教育报, 2012-03-28(3). 3 姜春林, 魏庆肖. 人文社会科学代表性论文评价指标体系建构及其实现机制[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2017(2): 97-106. 4 田贤鹏. 高校教师学术代表作制评价实施: 动因、挑战与路径[J]. 中国高教研究, 2020(2): 85-91. 5 袁广林. 后学术GDP时代我国高校科技评价范式的转变[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2020(11): 34-41. 6 Niu Q K, Zhou J L, Zeng A, et al. Which publication is your representative work?[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(3): 842-853. 7 Zhou J L, Zeng A, Fan Y, et al. The representative works of scientists[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(3): 1721-1732. 8 Alberts B. Election to the national academy of sciences: pathways to membership[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(21): 7405-7406. 9 Ioannidis J P A, Boyack K W, Small H, et al. Bibliometrics: is your most cited work your best?[J]. Nature, 2014, 514(7524): 561-562. 10 Atiquzzaman M. Editorial: 2015 best paper awards[J]. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2016, 65: A1-A3. 11 Block J. A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1995, 117(2): 187-215. 12 苏鹏, 张琳. 学术代表作时间周期、首发载体及题材类型特征研究——以图灵奖为例[J]. 图书情报知识, 2021, 38(1): 66-75. 13 俞立平, 张矿伟, 蒋长兵. 推进代表作评价存在的问题与对策研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(4): 345-353. 14 周志成. 高校学术评价制度改革困境及学术效用动态均衡模型演绎[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2019, 17(3): 38-45, 59. 15 Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations[M]. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2009: 25. 16 Baz A. Ordinary language philosophy[M]// Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016: 112-129. 17 Ryan S P. Reconsidering ordinary language philosophy: Malcolm’s (Moore’s) ordinary language argument[J]. Essays in Philosophy, 2010, 11(2): 123-149. 18 Schlagwein D, Schoder D, Spindeldreher K. Consolidated, systemic conceptualization, and definition of the “sharing economy”[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2020, 71(7): 817-838. 19 Moir L. What do we mean by corporate social responsibility?[J]. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2001, 1(2): 16-22. 20 Schroeder R G, Linderman K, Liedtke C, et al. Six sigma: definition and underlying theory[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2008, 26(4): 536-554. 21 van Quaquebeke N, Eckloff T. Defining respectful leadership: what it is, how it can be measured, and another glimpse at what it is related to[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 91(3): 343-358. 22 Brühne A I, Schanz D. Defining and managing corporate tax risk: perceptions of tax risk experts[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2022, 39(4): 2861-2902. 23 陆红如, 阮选敏, 成颖, 等. 复杂性理论视角的学术评价理论建构——基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(7): 731-754. 24 许天才, 冯婷婷, 潘雨亭, 等. 高校图书馆辅助论文代表作复合式评价的调研与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(14): 49-57. 25 Dutta S, Lanvin B, León L R, et al. Global Innovation Index 2022: what is the future of innovation-driven growth?[R]. Geneva: WIPO, 2022: 18-20. 26 Wu X L, Zhang C Z. Finding high-impact interdisciplinary users based on friend discipline distribution in academic social networking sites[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 119(2): 1017-1035. 27 Jeng W, Desautels S, He D Q, et al. Information exchange on an academic social networking site: a multidiscipline comparison on ResearchGate Q&A[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(3): 638-652. 28 Chen M H, Qi X J. Members’ satisfaction and continuance intention: a socio-technical perspective[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2015, 115(6): 1132-1150. 29 王建明, 王俊豪. 公众低碳消费模式的影响因素模型与政府管制政策——基于扎根理论的一个探索性研究[J]. 管理世界, 2011, 27(4): 58-68. 30 Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory[M]. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014: 73-349. 31 张曙光, 王红芳. 代表作评价制度的要素、困境与完善路径——基于社会学新制度主义的视角[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2023, 22(2): 115-122. 32 叶继元. 学术期刊与学术规范[J]. 学术界, 2005(4): 57-68. 33 杨奎松, 谢维扬, 赵世瑜, 等. 遵守学术规范推进学术对话——关于“学术对话与学术规范” 的笔谈[J]. 中国社会科学, 1999(4): 49-71, 205. 34 Prahalad C K, Hamel G. The core competence of the corporation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990, 68(3): 275-292. 35 董克, 吴佳纯. 科研论文代表作学术价值的生成机制、表现形式与测度策略研究[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 43(6): 25-35. 36 魏绪秋, 申力旭. 学术论文创新性研究述评[J]. 图书情报知识, 2022, 39(4): 68-79. 37 刘智强, 严荣笑, 唐双双. 领导创新期望与员工突破性创新投入: 基于悖论理论的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(10): 226-241. 38 吕冬晴, 阮选敏, 李江, 等. 跨学科知识融合对D指数的影响[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(3): 263-274. 39 尚增健. 渐进式技术创新: 科技型中小企业的成长路径——成长型中小企业成长机理的个案分析[J]. 管理世界, 2002, 18(6): 124-133. 40 Dewar R D, Dutton J E. The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis[J]. Management Science, 1986, 32(11): 1422-1433. 41 Rubin G D, Abramson R G. Creating value through incremental innovation: managing culture, structure, and process[J]. Radiology, 2018, 288(2): 330-340. 42 Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, et al. Atypical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472. 43 Trapido D. How novelty in knowledge earns recognition: the role of consistent identities[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(8): 1488-1500. 44 Li X, Hao J Y. Construction of an evaluation index system for determining the academic impact of military medical scholars[J]. BMJ Military Health, 2018, 164(3): 164-169. 45 Scoble R, Dickson K, Fisher J, et al. Research impact evaluation, a wider context: findings from a research impact pilot[R]. Uxbridge: Brunel University, 2009. 46 吕小红, 杨开英, 张蕾. 大数据时代精细加工提高科技论文显示度[J]. 编辑学报, 2018, 30(4): 373-375. 47 Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: communication and cognition[M]. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1986: 255-279. 48 Harter S P. Psychological relevance and information science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1992, 43(9): 602-615. 49 Spink A, Greisdorf H, Bateman J. Examining different regions of relevance: from highly relevant to not relevant[C]// Proceedings of the 61st ASIS Annual Meeting. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 1998: 3-12. 50 Burton V T, Chadwick S A. Investigating the practices of student researchers: patterns of use and criteria for use of Internet and library sources[J]. Computers and Composition, 2000, 17(3): 309-328. 51 Tang R, Solomon P. Use of relevance criteria across stages of document evaluation: on the complementarity of experimental and naturalistic studies[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001, 52(8): 676-685. 52 Savolainen R, Kari J. User-defined relevance criteria in web searching[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2006, 62(6): 685-707. 53 M?rtensson P, Fors U, Wallin S B, et al. Evaluating research: a multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice and quality[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(3): 593-603. 54 Horbach S P J M, Halffman W. The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 118(1): 339-373. 55 Plavén-Sigray P, Matheson G J, Schiffler B C, et al. The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time[J]. eLife, 2017, 6: e27725. 56 Bornmann L, Nast I, Daniel H D. Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 77(3): 415-432. 57 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Reproducibility and replicability in science[R]. Washington: National Academies Press, 2019: 1-3. 58 张泽青. 学术期刊发展的新机遇——职称制度改革对学术期刊的影响[J]. 编辑之友, 2017(10): 5-7. 59 曾建勋. 重视学术代表作的识别与遴选[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2021(9): 1. 60 邱均平, 张裕晨, 周子番. 新时代我国科研评价体系重构中必须处理好八大关系[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2021, 47(1): 47-60. 61 李广海. 理性的平衡: 高校学术评价制度变革的逻辑及操作指向[J]. 教育研究, 2017, 38(8): 85-90. 62 张积玉. 以量化为基础以代表作为主的综合化学术评价制度构建——基于S大学的经验[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 25(6): 84-96. 63 Peteraf M A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(3): 179-191. 64 Campion M A. Article review checklist: a criterion checklist for reviewing research articles in applied psychology[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1993, 46(3): 705-718. 65 Yaffe J. From the editor—on peer review: improving the credibility of social work scholarship[J]. Journal of Social Work Education, 2017, 53(4): 577-579. 66 Gerlach M. Editors must be vigilant to guarantee the quality and credibility of published scientific work[J]. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 2018, 10(4): 245-246. 67 Berenbaum M R. On peer review—then, now, and soon to be?[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023, 120(11): e2302593120. 68 Trial of transparent peer review yields promising results[J]. Nature, 2022, 603(7899): 8. 69 俞立平, 黄梦亭, 金鹏. “破五唯”下代表作评价制度有效性和有限性思考[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(8): 28-32, 50. 70 张新安. 中国消费者的顾客价值形成机制: 以手机为对象的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2010, 26(1): 107-121, 188. 71 李志军, 尚增健. 亟须纠正学术研究和论文写作中的“数学化”“模型化”等不良倾向[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(4): 5-6. 72 Gy?rffy B, Herman P, Szabó I. Research funding: past performance is a stronger predictor of future scientific output than reviewer scores[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2020, 14(3): 101050. 73 宋旭红, 高源. 大学教师代表性成果评价及反思[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2021, 19(4): 77-84. 74 任全娥. 代表性学术成果评价的图书情报学认知与阐释[J]. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 25(4): 119-128. 75 苏金燕. 政策视角下代表作评价制度分析[J]. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 25(1): 104-112. 76 钟华, 肖畅, 单连慧, 等. 定量分析支持的医学科研项目代表作评价[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(8): 82-87. 77 叶继元. 学术图书、学术著作、学术专著概念辨析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(1): 21-29. 78 许纪霖. 回归学术共同体的内在价值尺度[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014, 29(4): 78-82. 79 陈时见, 胡娜. 新时代高等学校教师学术评价的改进[J]. 教育研究, 2020, 41(2): 133-142. 80 Colquitt J A, Zapata-Phelan C P. Trends in theory building and theory testing: a five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(6): 1281-1303. 81 朱军文, 刘念才. 高校科研评价定量方法与质量导向的偏离及治理[J]. 教育研究, 2014, 35(8): 52-59. 82 王飞. “慢科研”: 内涵、意义与生成机理[J]. 现代大学教育, 2022, 38(1): 93-103, 112. 83 荆林波, 逯万辉. 新时代我国人文社会科学期刊发展与评价[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(5): 131-141. 84 何佳讯, 葛佳烨, 张凡. 中国学者管理学研究的世界贡献: 国际合作、前沿热点与贡献路径——基于世界千种管理学英文期刊论文(2013—2019年)的定量分析[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(9): 36-67. 85 杨瑞仙, 高鑫宁, 董克. 我国学术代表作评价研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(17): 129-140.
