The Evolutionary Characteristics of Sleeping Beauties from the Perspective of Altmetrics
Hou Jianhua1, Li Hao1, Zhang Yang1, Gao Jiping2
1.School of Information Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006 2.Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038
1 van Raan A F J. Sleeping Beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3): 467-472. 2 Li J, Ye F Y. The phenomenon of all-elements-sleeping-beauties in scientific literature[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 92(3): 795-799. 3 Barber B. Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery[J]. Science, 1961, 134(3479): 596-602. 4 Stent G S. Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery[J]. Scientific American, 1972, 227(6): 84-93. 5 Garfield E. Premature discovery or delayed recognition—why?[OL]. Current Contents, 1980(21): 5-10. (1980-05-26). http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v4p488y1979-80.pdf. 6 Braun T, Gl?nzel W, Schubert A. On Sleeping Beauties, Princes and other tales of Citation distributions …[J]. Research Evaluation, 2010, 19(3): 195-202. 7 Hu Z W, Wu Y S. Regularity in the time-dependent distribution of the percentage of never-cited papers: an empirical pilot study based on the six journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(1): 136-146. 8 Redner S. Citation statistics from 110 years of physical review[J]. Physics Today, 2005, 58(6): 49-54. 9 Garfield E. Delayed recognition in scientific discovery: citation frequency analysis aids the search for case histories[OL]. Current Contents, 1989(23): 3-9. (1989-06-05). http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v12p154y1989.pdf. 10 Garfield E. More delayed recognition. Part 1. Examples from the genetics of color blindness, the entropy of short-term memory, phosphoinositides, and polymer rheology[OL]. Current Contents, 1989(38): 3-8. (1989-09-18). http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v12p264y1989.pdf. 11 Garfield E. More delayed recognition. Part 2. From inhibin to scanning electron microcopy[OL]. Current Contents, 1990(9): 3-9. (1990-02-26). http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v13p068y1990.pdf. 12 Gl?nzel W, Schlemmer B, Thijs B. Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(3): 571-586. 13 Gl?nzel W, Garfield E. The myth of delayed recognition[J]. The Scientist, 2004, 18(11): 8-9. 14 Hou J H, Yang X C. Patent sleeping beauties: evolutionary trajectories and identification methods[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(1): 187-215. 15 Wang J, Thijs B, Gl?nzel W. Interdisciplinarity and impact: distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5): e0127298. 16 Du J, Wu Y S. A parameter-free index for identifying under-cited sleeping beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(2): 959-971. 17 Sun J J, Min C, Li J. A vector for measuring obsolescence of scientific articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(2): 745-757. 18 Li J. Citation curves of “all-elements-sleeping-beauties”: “?ash in the pan” ?rst and then “delayed recognition”[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(2): 595-601. 19 Egghe L, Guns R, Rousseau R. Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(8): 1637-1644. 20 Li J, Ye F Y. Distinguishing sleeping beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 108(2): 821-828. 21 El Aichouchi A, Gorry P. Delayed recognition of Judah Folkman's hypothesis on tumor angiogenesis: when a Prince awakens a Sleeping Beauty by self-citation[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(1): 385-399. 22 Huang T C, Hsu C, Ciou Z J. Systematic methodology for excavating sleeping beauty publications and their princes from medical and biological engineering studies[J]. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2015, 35(6): 749-758. 23 Ohba N, Nakao K. Sleeping beauties in ophthalmology[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 93(2): 253-264. 24 Du J, Wu Y S. A bibliometric framework for identifying “princes” who wake up the “sleeping beauty” in challenge-type scientific discoveries[J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2017, 1(1): 50-68. 25 Burrell Q L. Are “Sleeping Beauties” to be expected?[J]. Scientometrics, 2005, 65(3): 381-389. 26 van Raan A F J. Dormitory of physical and engineering sciences: sleeping beauties may be sleeping innovations[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10): e0139786. 27 van Raan A F J. Sleeping beauties cited in patents: is there also a dormitory of inventions?[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 110(3): 1123-1156. 28 van Raan A F J, Winnink J J. Do younger Sleeping Beauties prefer a technological Prince?[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 114(2): 701-717. 29 杜建, 武夷山. “睡美人”文献的重要特征、预测线索与政策启示[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(11): 1938-1945. 30 梁立明, 林晓锦, 钟镇, 等. 迟滞承认: 科学中的睡美人现象——以一篇被迟滞承认的超弦理论论文为例[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2009, 31(1): 39-45, 111. 31 Li J, Shi D B, Zhao S X, et al. A study of the “heartbeat spectra” for “sleeping beauties”[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(3): 493-502. 32 Bornmann L. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(2): 217-233. 33 Bornmann L, Haunschild R, Adams J. Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF)[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 325-340. 34 Prime J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, et al. Altmetrics: a manifesto[EB/OL]. [2010-10-26]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. 35 Waltman L, Costas R. F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: a comparison with citations Citation[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(3): 433-445. 36 Costas R, Zahedi Z, Wouters P. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(10): 2003-2019. 37 Haustein S, Peters I, Sugimoto C R, et al. Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(4): 656-669. 38 de Winter J C F. The relationship between tweets, citations, and article views for PLOS ONE articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(2): 1773-1779. 39 Sud P, Thelwall M. Evaluating altmetrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2): 1131-1143. 40 Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact[J]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2011, 13(4): e123. 41 Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, et al. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e64841. 42 Zahedi Z, Costas R, Wouters P. How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1491-1513. 43 Mohammadi E, Thelwall M, Haustein S, et al. Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(9): 1832-1846. 44 Ebrahimy S, Mehrad J, Setareh F, et al. Path analysis of the relationship between visibility and citation: the mediating roles of save, discussion, and recommendation metrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(3): 1497-1510. 45 Bornmann L, Haunschild R. Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(5): e0197133. 46 Bornmann L. Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: a case study using data from PLOS and F1000Prime[J]. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 2015, 67(3): 305-319. 47 Bornmann L. Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(3): 1123-1144. 48 郭飞, 游滨, 薛婧媛. Altmetrics热点论文传播特性及影响力分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(15): 86-93. 49 Warren V T, Patel B, Boyd C J. Analyzing the relationship between Altmetric score and literature citations in the Implantology literature[J]. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2020, 22(1): 54-58. 50 Iorns E. Reproducibility: an important altmetric[EB/OL]. (2012-06-21) [2012-07-21]. http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/iorns/. 51 Fenner M. Altmetrics will be taken personally at PLOS[EB/OL]. (2012-06-21) [2012-07-21]. http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/fenner/. 52 Adie E. Taking the alternative mainstream[J]. El Professional De La Informacion, 2014, 23(4): 349-351. 53 Das A K, Mishra S. Genesis of altmetrics or article-level metrics for measuring efficacy of scholarly communications: current perspectives[J]. Journal of Scientometric Research, 2014, 3(2): 82-92. 54 Wardle D A. Do ‘Faculty of 1000’ (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact?[J]. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 2010, 3: 11-15. 55 Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: a comparative study using data from InCites and F1000[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(2): 286-291. 56 Shema H, Bar-Ilan J, Thelwall M. Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(5): 1018-1027. 57 Zahedi Z, Costas R, Wouters P. Assessing the impact of publications saved by mendeley users: is there any different pattern among users?[C]// Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences, 2014: Paper 4. 58 Haustein S, Siebenlist T. Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(3): 446-457. 59 Shuai X, Pepe A, Bollen J. How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, twitter mentions, and citations[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e47523. 60 Zhang L W, Wang J. Why highly cited articles are not highly tweeted? A biology case[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(1): 495-509. 61 Chapa J, Haq Z, Cifu A S. Comparative analysis of the factors associated with citation and media coverage of clinical research[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(3): 1271-1283. 62 Martín-Martín A, Thelwall M, Orduna-Malea E, et al. Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitation' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(1): 871-906. 63 赵蓉英, 王旭. 多维信息计量视角下学术期刊影响力评价研究——以国际LIS期刊为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019, 30(7): 773-781. 64 王旭, 赵蓉英. 融合Altmetrics的话语引导力指标与被引频次关系研究——以中国英文学术期刊为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(7): 37-43, 36. 65 Wang X G, Lv T, Hamerly D. How do altmetric sources evaluate scientific collaboration? An empirical investigation for Chinese collaboration publications[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2019, 38(3): 563-576. 66 赵蓉英, 王建品, 冯雪峰, 等. 基于Altmetrics的开放获取期刊论文影响力评价研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(1): 81-86. 67 Wang M Y, Wang Z Y, Chen G S. Which can better predict the future success of articles? Bibliometric indices or alternative metrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 119(3): 1575-1595. 68 王凯利, 黄晓, 吴江. 融合Altmetrics和引文分析的期刊影响力综合评价研究[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(2): 169-177. 69 Mullins C H, Boyd C J, Corey B L. Examining the correlation between altmetric score and citations in the general surgery literature[J]. Journal of Surgical Research, 2020, 248: 159-164. 70 赵蓉英, 王旭. 引入Altmetrics指标的学术期刊影响力评价研究——以国际图书情报学期刊为例[J]. 图书与情报, 2018(5): 1-10. 71 Hou J H, Yang X C. Social media-based sleeping beauties: defining, identifying and features[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2020, 14(2): 101012. 72 Sugimoto C R, Work S, Larivière V, et al. Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(9): 2037-2062. 73 Haustein S. Grand challenges in altmetrics: heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 108(1): 413-423. 74 Ravenscroft J, Liakata M, Clare A, et al. Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: an assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(3): e0173152. 75 Ye F Y, Bornmann L. “Smart girls” versus “sleeping beauties” in the sciences: the identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(3): 359-367. 76 王真, 马建华. 基于PLoS开放获取数据的单篇论文网络浏览量累积规律的数理统计及分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(12): 72-83.
