Analysis of the Characteristic Factors and the Evolution of the High Altmetrics Score Papers in 2013-2018
Ou Guiyan1,2, Ma Tingcan1,2, Li Ruinan1,2, He Xueyao1,2, Yue Mingliang1
1.Wuhan Documentation and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071 2.Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
摘要作为衡量新型影响力的计量方法，Altmetrics的出现引起了科技评价领域的广泛讨论。研究影响高Altmetrics指标论文的特征因素及其演变情况，可为合理使用 Altmetrics 指标提供借鉴，为发展和完善Altmetrics计量方法提供参考。因此，本文选取Altmetric Top 100论文作为研究样本，对比分析2013—2018年6年的高Altmetrics指标论文的时间分布、期刊分布、研究领域分布以及多源指标贡献度的演变情况。研究结果表明，高Altmetrics指标论文的网络关注度大体上逐年上升，并主要发表在Nature、Science、PNAS等10种高影响力期刊上，分布于医学健康科学、生物科学等8个研究领域。在多项Altmetrics指标中，News、Blogs以及Twitter表现出显著优势。
欧桂燕, 马廷灿, 李瑞婻, 禾雪瑶, 岳名亮. 2013—2018年高Altmetrics指标论文的特征演变分析[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(3): 243-252.
Ou Guiyan, Ma Tingcan, Li Ruinan, He Xueyao, Yue Mingliang. Analysis of the Characteristic Factors and the Evolution of the High Altmetrics Score Papers in 2013-2018. 情报学报, 2020, 39(3): 243-252.
1 American Society for Cell Biology. San Francisco declaration on research assessment[EB/OL]. [2019-05-15]. https://sfdora.org/read/. 2 HicksD, WoutersP. 关于科研指标的莱顿宣言[EB/OL]. [2019-05-15]. http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/uploads/4/1/6/0/41603901/leiden_manifesto_chinese_150423.pdf. 3 Altmetric. What are Altmetrics?[EB/OL]. [2019-05-15]. https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/ Photo#pretty. 4 PriemJ, TaraborelliD, GrothP, et al. Altmetrics: A manifesto[EB/OL]. [2019-05-15]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto. 5 邱均平, 余厚强. 论推动替代计量学发展的若干基本问题[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(1): 4-15. 6 由庆斌, 汤珊红. 补充计量学及应用前景[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(12): 6-10. 7 刘春丽. Web 2.0环境下的科学计量学: 选择性计量学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(14): 52-56, 92. 8 王睿, 胡文静, 郭玮. 高Altmetrics指标科技论文学术影响力研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(21): 92-98. 9 李根, 苗琦. 2014年Altmetric中网络关注度最高的前100篇学术论文特征分析及其启示[J]. 编辑学报, 2016, 28(2): 195-198. 10 匡登辉. 从Altmetrics热点论文看科技期刊影响力——以Altmetric.com Top 100论文为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(11): 1188-1194. 11 GulS, ShuebS, HussainA. Research in the spotlight on social web: Analyzing the top 100 Altmetric articles of 2015[J]. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2016: 1488. 12 刘趁. 基于多重计量指标的论文开放获取优势研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2016. 13 刘灿, 任胜利. 世界各主要国家或地区科研投入与产出的比较分析[J]. 中国科学基金, 2016, 30(3): 283-288. 14 刘晓娟, 宋婉姿. 基于PLOS ALM的altmetrics指标可用性分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(4): 93-101. 15 AlperinJ P. Geographic variation in social media metrics: An analysis of Latin American journal articles[J]. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 2015, 67(3): 289-304. 16 HausteinS, CostasR, LarivièreV. Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: the effect of document properties and collaboration patterns[J]. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(5): e0120495. 17 刘晓娟, 余梦霞. Altmetrics覆盖率影响因素及应用分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(16): 92-101. 18 HausteinS, PetersI, Bar-IlanJ, et al. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1145-1163. 19 PooladianA, Borregoángel. Methodological issues in measuring citations in Wikipedia: a case study in Library and Information Science[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(1): 455-464. 20 PiwowarH. Altmetrics: Value all research products[J]. Nature, 2013, 493(7431): 159. 21 WoutersP, UsersCostas R., narcissism and control—Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century[M]. SURFfoundation, 2012. 22 HolmbergK, VainioJ. Why do some research articles receive more online attention and higher altmetrics? Reasons for online success according to the authors[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(1): 435-447. 23 BanshalS K, BasuA, SinghV K, et al. vsScientific. public attention: A comparison of top cited papers in WoS and top papers by Altmetric Score[C]// Proceedings of the International Workshop on Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurements and Scholarly Information Management. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 81-95.
