Research on the Identification of Emerging Technologies Integrating Multidimensional Perspectives
Li Guojun1,2, Xie Fei3, Tang Xinglong2, Wang Bingqi2,4, Xu Yang2
1.Peking University Library, Beijing 100871 2.Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871 3.Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development, Beijing 100038 4.Institute of Scientific and Technical Information, Beijing Academy of Science and Technology, Beijing 100089
1 National Science and Technology Council. Critical and emerging technologies list update[EB/OL]. (2022-02-02) [2023-09-20]. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/02-2022-Critical-and-Emerging-Technologies-List-Update.pdf. 2 Bellasio J, Slapakova L, Huxtable L, et al. Innovative technologies shaping the 2040 battlefield[EB/OL]. (2021-08-04) [2023-09-20]. https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP68698. html. 3 Critical technologies statement[EB/OL]. (2023-05-22) [2023-09-20]. https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/critical-technologies-statement. 4 Rotolo D, Hicks D, Martin B R. What is an emerging technology?[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(10): 1827-1843. 5 Wang Q. A bibliometric model for identifying emerging research topics[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(2): 290-304. 6 Xu H Y, Winnink J, Yue Z H, et al. Multidimensional Scientometric indicators for the detection of emerging research topics[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 163: 120490. 7 Jiang M, Yang S L, Gao Q. Multidimensional indicators to identify emerging technologies: perspective of technological knowledge flow[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2024, 18(1): 101483. 8 Crutchfield J P. Is anything ever new? Considering emergence[M]// Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2013: 50-62. 9 Adner R, Levinthal D A. The emergence of emerging technologies[J]. California Management Review, 2002, 45(1): 50-66. 10 Burmaoglu S, Sartenaer O, Porter A. Conceptual definition of technology emergence: a long journey from philosophy of science to science policy[J]. Technology in Society, 2019, 59: 101126. 11 Price D J. Little science, big science[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963. 12 Goldstein J. Emergence as a construct: history and issues[J]. Emergence, 1999, 1(1): 49-72. 13 什么是涌现?[EB/OL]. (2023-04-17) [2023-09-09]. https://swarma.org/?p=41827. 14 PinesD. 涌现: 21世纪科学的统一主题[EB/OL]. 郭瑞东, 译. (2022-03-30) [2023-09-09]. https://swarma.org/?p=33487. 15 Alexander J, Chase J, Newman N, et al. Emergence as a conceptual framework for understanding scientific and technological progress[C]// Proceedings of PICMET 2012: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies. Piscataway: IEEE, 2012: 1286-1292. 16 Carley S F, Newman N C, Porter A L, et al. An indicator of technical emergence[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(1): 35-49. 17 Garfield E, Sher I H, Torpie R J. The use of citation data in writing the history of science[R]. Philadelphia: Institute of Scientific Information, 1964. 18 Kajikawa Y, Yoshikawa J, Takeda Y, et al. Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: toward a roadmap for sustainable energy[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008, 75(6): 771-782. 19 Takeda Y, Kajikawa Y. Optics: a bibliometric approach to detect emerging research domains and intellectual bases[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(3): 543-558. 20 Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Takeda Y, et al. Detecting emerging research fronts in regenerative medicine by the citation network analysis of scientific publications[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2011, 78(2): 274-282. 21 Iwami S, Mori J, Sakata I, et al. Detection method of emerging leading papers using time transition[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1515-1533. 22 Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, 24(4): 265-269. 23 Small H. Tracking and predicting growth areas in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(3): 595-610. 24 Cho T S, Shih H Y. Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997-2008[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(3): 795-811. 25 Boyack K W, Klavans R, Small H, et al. Characterizing the emergence of two nanotechnology topics using a contemporaneous global micro-model of science[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2014, 32: 147-159. 26 Kessler M M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers[J]. American Documentation, 1963, 14(1): 10-25. 27 Morris S A, Yen G, Wu Z, et al. Time line visualization of research fronts[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(5): 413-422. 28 Kuusi O, Meyer M. Anticipating technological breakthroughs: Using bibliographic coupling to explore the nanotubes paradigm[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 70(3): 759-777. 29 Callon M, Courtial J P, Turner W A, et al. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis[J]. Social Science Information, 1983, 22(2): 191-235. 30 Lee W H. How to identify emerging research fields using scientometrics: an example in the field of Information Security[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 76(3): 503-525. 31 Ohniwa R L, Hibino A, Takeyasu K. Trends in research foci in life science fields over the last 30 years monitored by emerging topics[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(1): 111-127. 32 Yoon J, Choi S, Kim K. Invention property-function network analysis of patents: a case of silicon-based thin film solar cells[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 86(3): 687-703. 33 Rafols I, Porter A L, Leydesdorff L. Science overlay maps: a new tool for research policy and library management[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(9): 1871-1887. 34 Leydesdorff L, Rotolo D, Rafols I. Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject headings of PubMed[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(11): 2239-2253. 35 Leydesdorff L, Rafols I, Chen C M. Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(12): 2573-2586. 36 Kay L, Newman N, Youtie J, et al. Patent overlay mapping: Visualizing technological distance[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(12): 2432-2443. 37 Goldstein J. Emergence, creativity, and the logic of following and negating[J]. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 2005, 10(3): Article 4. 38 FUSE: foresight and understanding from scientific exposition[EB/OL]. [2023-09-20]. https://www.iarpa.gov/research-programs/fuse. 39 Foster J, Metcalfe J S. Economic emergence: an evolutionary economic perspective[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2012, 82(2/3): 420-432. 40 Martin R, Sunley P. Forms of emergence and the evolution of economic landscapes[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2012, 82(2/3): 338-351. 41 Harper D A, Endres A M. The anatomy of emergence, with a focus upon capital formation[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2012, 82(2/3): 352-367. 42 Burmaoglu S, Sartenaer O, Porter A, et al. Analysing the theoretical roots of technology emergence: an evolutionary perspective[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 119(1): 97-118. 43 Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) analytics[EB/OL]. (2018-04-20) [2024-12-13]. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/microsoft-academic-graph-mag-analytics/. 44 Clarivate. Web of Science平台[EB/OL]. [2024-11-12]. https://clarivate.com.cn/academia-government/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-referencing/web-of-science/. 45 Scopus: a comprehensive abstract and citation database for impact makers[EB/OL]. [2024-11-14]. https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus. 46 OpenAlex[EB/OL]. [2024-10-10]. https://openalex.org/. 47 Dimensions AI[EB/OL]. [2024-10-10]. https://www.dimensions.ai/. 48 Semantic Scholar[EB/OL]. [2024-10-11]. https://www.semanticscholar.org/. 49 APS data sets for research[EB/OL]. [2024-10-14]. https://journals.aps.org/datasets. 50 PubMed[EB/OL]. [2024-10-19]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. 51 arXiv.org e-print archive[EB/OL]. [2024-10-09]. https://arxiv.org/. 52 The Lens[EB/OL]. [2024-10-09]. https://www.lens.org/. 53 Klavans R, Boyack K W. Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(4): 984-998. 54 Newman M E J. Modularity and community structure in networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(23): 8577-8582. 55 Traag V A, Waltman L, van Eck N J. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: Article No.5233. 56 Welcome to YAKE! Documentation website[EB/OL]. [2024-11-11]. https://liaad.github.io/yake/. 57 IEEE Computer Society. 2023 technology predictions[EB/OL]. [2024-12-12]. https://ieeecs-media.computer.org/media/tech-news/tech-predictions-report-2023.pdf.
