创新生态系统视角下“卡脖子”技术潜在攻关主体识别研究

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.11.005

情报学报

2024, Vol. 43

Issue (11): 1310-1321 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.11.005

情报技术与应用

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

创新生态系统视角下“卡脖子”技术潜在攻关主体识别研究

马宏业^1,2, 冯南平^1,2, 杨善林¹

1.合肥工业大学管理学院，合肥 230009
2.数据科学与智慧社会治理教育部哲学社会科学实验室，合肥 230009

Identification of Potential Key Players in “Neck-Jamming” Technologies within Framework of Innovation Ecosystems

Ma Hongye^1,2, Feng Nanping^1,2, Yang Shanlin¹

1.School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009
2.Ministry of Education Philosophy and Social Science Experimental Laboratory for Data Science and Smart Society Governance, Hefei 230009

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (7)

全文: PDF (1888 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要科学识别潜在攻关主体是构建面向“卡脖子”技术攻关的创新生态系统的首要问题。本研究立足于资源编排理论，基于专利的特征信息、国际专利分类法（International Patent Classification，IPC）分类号和文本的多维数据，构建“卡脖子”技术潜在攻关主体识别两阶段模型。首先，通过评估领域创新主体的资源禀赋，形成潜在攻关主体“资源池”；其次，评估系统领导者与潜在攻关主体间的协同能力，并基于资源禀赋与协同能力将潜在系统成员聚类分成核心型、发展型、一般型和外围型四类，据此进行成员选择；最后，以光刻机技术为例，应用模型并验证其科学性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	马宏业
	冯南平
	杨善林

关键词 ： “卡脖子”技术, 创新生态系统, 潜在攻关主体识别, 专利分析, BERT模型

收稿日期: 2024-03-15

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目“‘卡脖子’情境下使命导向型创新生态系统的构建策略研究”（22BGL034）。

作者简介: 马宏业，女，2000年生，博士研究生，主要研究领域为创新管理；冯南平，通信作者，女，1981年生，博士，副教授，博士生导师，主要研究领域为创新管理，E-mail：fengnp@hfut.edu.cn；杨善林，男，1948年生，教授，博士生导师，中国工程院院士，主要研究领域为管理科学与信息系统工程；

引用本文:

马宏业, 冯南平, 杨善林. 创新生态系统视角下“卡脖子”技术潜在攻关主体识别研究[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43(11): 1310-1321.
Ma Hongye, Feng Nanping, Yang Shanlin. Identification of Potential Key Players in “Neck-Jamming” Technologies within Framework of Innovation Ecosystems. 情报学报, 2024, 43(11): 1310-1321.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.11.005 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2024/V43/I11/1310

1 张于喆. 建设科技强国亟须集中力量打好关键核心技术攻坚战[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2021(10): 75-89.
2 柳卸林, 常馨之, 董彩婷. 构建创新生态系统, 实现核心技术突破性创新——以IMEC在集成电路领域创新实践为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(9): 3-18.
3 王璐瑶, 曲冠楠, RogersJuan. 面向“卡脖子”问题的知识创新生态系统分析: 核心挑战、理论构建与现实路径[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(4): 94-102.
4 Adner R, Kapoor R. Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: re-examining technology S-curves[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(4): 625-648.
5 宋娟, 谭劲松, 王可欣, 等. 创新生态系统视角下核心企业突破关键核心技术“卡脖子”——以中国高速列车牵引系统为例[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(5): 4-17.
6 Jiang H, Yang J X, Liu W T. Innovation ecosystem stability and enterprise innovation performance: the mediating effect of knowledge acquisition[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2022, 26(11): 378-400.
7 张敬文, 江晓珊, 徐莉. 战略性新兴产业技术创新联盟合作伙伴选择及评价研究——基于技术生态位视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(5): 127-132.
8 张敬文, 江晓珊, 周海燕. 战略性新兴产业技术创新联盟合作伙伴选择研究——基于PLS-SEM模型的实证分析[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2016(5): 79-86, 159.
9 Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(2): 171-180.
10 Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1): 273-292.
11 孙元, 吴梅丽, 苏芳. 基于技术资源的创新生态系统演化及价值共创过程研究——以科大讯飞为例[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, (2023-04-28). http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20230423. 0955.004.html.
12 周常宝, 冯志红, 林润辉, 等. 从产品导向到生态导向: 高科技企业创新生态系统的构建——基于大疆的纵向案例[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(3): 337-352.
13 Wu C, Barnes D. Formulating partner selection criteria for agile supply chains: a dempster-shafer belief acceptability optimisation approach[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 125(2): 284-293.
14 吴菲菲, 米兰, 黄鲁成, 等. 技术资源匹配视角下研发合作伙伴识别与选择[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(14): 23-29.
15 徐浩, 刘宇琴. 资源互补、技术共享对企业研发联盟合作绩效影响实证研究[J]. 商业经济研究, 2015(24): 107-109.
16 Wang M Y. Exploring potential R&D collaborators with complementary technologies: the case of biosensors[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2012, 79(5): 862-874.
17 Yoon B, Song B. A systematic approach of partner selection for open innovation[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2014, 114(7): 1068-1093.
18 Chen S B, Rao P. Land degradation monitoring using multi-temporal Landsat TM/ETM data in a transition zone between grassland and cropland of Northeast China[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008, 29(7): 2055-2073.
19 俞荣建, 王雅萍, 赵一智, 等. 破解“卡脖子”技术难题: “情境—策略”非对称匹配视角[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(4): 580-592.
20 张治河, 苗欣苑. “卡脖子”关键核心技术的甄选机制研究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 49(6): 5-15.
21 陈劲, 阳镇, 朱子钦. 新型举国体制的理论逻辑、落地模式与应用场景[J]. 改革, 2021(5): 1-17.
22 游光荣, 蒋金利. 新型举国体制的特征、分析框架与实施路径[J]. 科技导报, 2023, 41(6): 6-12.
23 李君然, 魏莹. 国家目标下的创新生态系统构建: 以极紫外光刻机为例[J]. 学术研究, 2024(1): 89-97.
24 Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): 116-145.
25 Teece D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(13): 1319-1350.
26 de Groote J K, Schell S, Kammerlander N, et al. The role of similarity and complementarity in the selection of potential partners for open innovation projects in family firms[J]. Small Business Economics, 2023, 60(4): 1347-1367.
27 Chen F Q, Meng Q S, Li F. How resource information backgrounds trigger post-merger integration and technology innovation? A dynamic analysis of resource similarity and complementarity[J]. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2017, 23(2): 167-198.
28 Bessen J. The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(5): 932-945.
29 Caviggioli F, Scellato G, Ughetto E. International patent disputes: evidence from oppositions at the European Patent Office[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(9): 1634-1646.
30 Jaffe A B, de Rassenfosse G. Patent citation data in social science research: overview and best practices[M]// Research Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019, 2: 20-46.
31 Hiller R S, Savage S J, Waldman D M. Using aggregate market data to estimate patent value: an application to United States smartphones 2010 to 2015[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2018, 60: 1-31.
32 Schettino F, Sterlacchini A, Venturini F. Inventive productivity and patent quality: evidence from Italian inventors[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2013, 35(6): 1043-1056.
33 Aharonson B S, Schilling M A. Mapping the technological landscape: Measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(1): 81-96.
34 Breunig M M, Kriegel H P, Ng R T, et al. LOF: identifying density-based local outliers[C]// Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. New York: ACM Press, 2000: 93-104.
35 Ernst H. Patent information for strategic technology management[J]. World Patent Information, 2003, 25(3): 233-242.
36 方曦, 崔梁雨, 刘云. 基于专利特征的人工智能领域核心技术识别及发展趋势分析——层次分析(AHP)-熵权法[J]. 科技管理研究, 2024, 44(2): 35-44.
37 刘欢, 张智雄, 王宇飞. BERT模型的主要优化改进方法研究综述[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(1): 3-15.
38 Madden T J, Ellen P S, Ajzen I. A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1992, 18(1): 3-9.
39 Jaffe A B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value[J]. American Economic Review, 1986, 76(5): 984-999.
40 王秀红, 袁艳, 赵志程, 等. 专利文献的结构树模型及其在相似度计算中的应用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(3): 107-111.
41 Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K, et al. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]// Proceedings of the Conference on the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 4171-4186.
42 Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1995, 22(7): 763-770.
43 Jacobides M G, Cennamo C, Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(8): 2255-2276.
44 Makri M, Hitt M A, Lane P J. Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(6): 602-628.
45 Sun H J, Wang S R. Measuring the component overlapping in the Gaussian mixture model[J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2011, 23(3): 479-502.
46 Fraley C, Raftery A E. Bayesian regularization for normal mixture estimation and model-based clustering[J]. Journal of Classification, 2007, 24(2): 155-181.
47 李娟, 李保安, 方晗, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法的发明专利价值评估——以丰田开放专利为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(5): 59-63.