|
|
2018 Vol. 37, No. 11
Published: 2018-11-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1077 |
Research on Semantic Annotation in Academic Literature |
|
|
Sun Jianjun, Pei Lei, Jiang Ting |
|
|
DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2018.11.001 |
|
|
Since the vast size of academic literature can present difficulties to researchers, semantic annotation is essential to rapid reading and knowledge acquisition. In order to regulate and enrich the semantic annotation system of academic literature, this paper focuses on the construction of an annotation ontology, the construction of a domain ontology of discipline domains, and the relationship between the terms in annotation ontology and domain ontology. This paper provides several instances of semantic annotation, such as labeling concepts, relationship of concepts, methods, processes and citations in academic literatures. |
|
|
2018 Vol. 37 (11): 1077-1086
[Abstract]
(
240
)
HTML
(1 KB)
PDF
(1351 KB)
(
726
) |
|
|
|
1114 |
Deep Learning-Based Classification of Pre-Qin Classics Questions |
|
|
Wang Dongbo, Gao Ruiqing, Shen Si, Li Bin |
|
|
DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2018.11.004 |
|
|
In recent years, the automated question answering system has become a research hotspot in the fields of machine learning, information retrieval, and natural language processing. This question answering system provides simple and accurate answers in a natural language to the questions posed by users. Since question classification is the first step toward developing a question answering system, the classification results make a direct impact on the quality of a question answering system. However, most of the current question classification research in the field focuses on modern Chinese, and there are relatively few studies on the classification of the questions related to ancient Chinese. This paper starts with the concept of question classification and constructs the question classification system for ancient documents; and then uses TF-IDF to extract the category feature words. We use a support vector machine, conditional random fields, and a deep learning model, to conduct the classics question automatic classification experiment. The results show that the Bi-LSTM model offers the best classification among the three, and delivered a reconciliation average of 94.78 on the seven categories proposed in this paper, which has a strong application value. |
|
|
2018 Vol. 37 (11): 1114-1122
[Abstract]
(
278
)
HTML
(1 KB)
PDF
(927 KB)
(
706
) |
|
|
|
1123 |
Research on the Relevance between Competitiveness and the Scientific Research Output of World-Class Universities |
|
|
Zhang Weichong, Meng Hao, Wang Fang |
|
|
DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2018.11.005 |
|
|
Exploring the core elements characterizing the competitiveness of world-class universities and formulating the correct path to its improvement is of great significance for building a world-class university. This article examines the top 50 universities in the World University Rankings as samples. First, nine representative research output measurement indicators, X1-X9, were selected for statistical analysis, which included the four dimensions of productivity, influence, contribution, and level of internationalization. Second, X1-X9 were set as the independent variables and each university’s score in the QS/USNEWS/THE/ARWU university rankings was established as a dependent variable, Yi. The variable selection and parameter estimation experiments were carried out with four multiple linear regression models, Lasso/Ridge/LassoLars/BayesianRidge, and finally a well-fitting effect was obtained. The results reveal positive correlations between the impact factors of scientific research output, the total citation frequency, the number of cooperation organizations, and the annual average frequency of international cooperation with the competitiveness of world-class universities. However, results also showed that the number of papers per year, the growth rate of papers, the number of co-authors, the total annual frequency of institutional cooperation, and the frequency of cooperation between countries are not significantly related to the competitiveness of world-class universities. |
|
|
2018 Vol. 37 (11): 1123-1131
[Abstract]
(
193
)
HTML
(1 KB)
PDF
(481 KB)
(
806
) |
|
|
|
1140 |
Study on Recognition Methods for Interdisciplinary Periodicals |
|
|
Zhang Huiling, Xu Haiyun, Liu Chunjiang |
|
|
DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2018.11.007 |
|
|
In view of the utility of interdisciplinary journal identification methods, this paper systematically reviews the research on these methods both at home and abroad. Based on this, interdiscipline characteristics, the interdisciplinary recognition method is applied to interdisciplinary journal identification. Through interdisciplinary identification methods and comparative analysis of journal papers, the specific formula was amended by identifying and selecting the indicators with higher validity of interdisciplinary journal identification. The empirical results show that the indicators of interdisciplinary journal identification can be divided into academic periodical diversity indicators, balance indicators, aggregation indicators, and comprehensive indicators. The applicability of journal identification indicators varies in different disciplines. Among these indicators, the S-index for measuring periodical diversity, while the GI-index for focusing on journal balance have a good effect on cross-sectional measurement of journal subjects, and they can be used for interdisciplinary journal identification. |
|
|
2018 Vol. 37 (11): 1140-1153
[Abstract]
(
183
)
HTML
(1 KB)
PDF
(537 KB)
(
626
) |
|
|
|
1164 |
Information Searching Behavior of Digital Library Users Based on Their Cognitive Styles |
|
|
Zhang Lulu, Huang Kun |
|
|
DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2018.11.009 |
|
|
To better understand the differences in searching behavior by digital library users exercising different cognitive styles, this research recruited 30 participants from the Beijing Normal University to take part in the experimental study. It detected the specific, generic, and abstract searching tasks, and recorded the participants’ searching process. Using content analysis, it analyzes the differences between field-independent users and field-dependent users, with respect to the overall characteristics, and particularly search behavior characteristics within a searching session. The findings indicated that the differences in the key searching behaviors between the two kinds of users were significant. This includes the use of search points and search function, the frequency of queries, the duration time within one searching session, and the patterns of query reformulations. |
|
|
2018 Vol. 37 (11): 1164-1174
[Abstract]
(
356
)
HTML
(1 KB)
PDF
(498 KB)
(
607
) |
|
|
|