|
|
Identification Methodology Research for Breakthrough Technological Innovations Based on Dynamic Complex Networks |
Zhou Wenhao, Wu Bingyi, Li Hailin, Wang Panxi |
College of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021 |
|
|
Abstract Identifying and anticipating breakthrough technological innovations is critical for precisely implementing technological interventions and accelerating the formation of new quality productive forces. However, traditional single-measurement indicators cannot fully reflect the rich connotation and multidimensional characteristics of breakthrough technological innovations. Based on the theory of technological leap and knowledge recombination theory, this study constructed a novel two-stage identification method for breakthrough technological innovations based on a dynamic patent similarity network. It comprehensively examined two characteristics: the source of technological novelty and the impact of technology. The empirical study of 61431 authorized patents from 982 Chinese manufacturing enterprises successfully identified 3738 breakthrough technological innovations, accounting for 6.085%. Among them, independent and knowledge recombination breakthrough technologies accounted for 3.488% and 2.596%, respectively. Further, topic models were used to refine the main research fields and directions of breakthrough technological innovations. The effectiveness and robustness of the identification results were comprehensively verified by combining economic consequences, typical technology cases, technology field evolution cases, and multiple statistical models. The research findings provide a feasible identification framework and tools for breakthrough innovation-related research and technology foresight and technology policy formulation on the practical level.
|
Received: 20 February 2024
|
|
|
|
1 林春培, 朱晓艳, 余传鹏, 等. 跨界团队网络特征对其颠覆性创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43(4): 391-404. 2 陈傲, 柳卸林. 突破性技术从何而来?——一个文献评述[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(9): 1281-1290. 3 Zheng Y F, Yang H B. Does familiarity foster innovation? The impact of alliance partner repeatedness on breakthrough innovations[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2015, 52(2): 213-230. 4 Bakker J, Verhoeven D, Zhang L, et al. Patent citation indicators: one size fits all?[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(1): 187-211. 5 张金柱, 张晓林. 利用引用科学知识突变识别突破性创新[J]. 情报学报, 2014, 33(3): 259-266. 6 王康, 陈悦, 王玉奇, 等. 基于专利引用变化的颠覆性技术识别研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(1): 74-80, 169. 7 任海英, 邵文, 李欣. 基于专利内容新颖性和常规性的突破性发明影响因素和研发策略分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(2): 56-63. 8 Capponi G, Martinelli A, Nuvolari A. Breakthrough innovations and where to find them[J]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(1): 104376. 9 马荣康, 王艺棠. 基于专利相似度的突破性技术发明识别研究——以纳米技术为例[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(5): 153-160. 10 Caviggioli F. Technology fusion: identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data[J]. Technovation, 2016, 55-56: 22-32. 11 Small H, Boyack K W, Klavans R. Identifying emerging topics in science and technology[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(8): 1450-1467. 12 Fritsch M. The theory of economic development–an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle[J]. Regional Studies, 2017, 51(4): 654-655. 13 丁乐蓉, 石静, 吴柯烨, 等. 技术团队跨学科性对突破性创新的影响研究[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43(5): 503-515. 14 余博文, 刘向. 突破式创新发明人的合作倾向[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43(3): 251-260. 15 Golder P N, Shacham R, Mitra D. Findings—innovations’ origins: when, by whom, and how are radical innovations developed?[J]. Marketing Science, 2009, 28(1): 166-179. 16 Haupt R, Kloyer M, Lange M. Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(3): 387-398. 17 Castaldi C, Frenken K, Los B. Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: an analysis of US state-level patenting[J]. Regional Studies, 2015, 49(5): 767-781. 18 Dahlin K B, Behrens D M. When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(5): 717-737. 19 Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change[J]. Research Policy, 1982, 11(3): 147-162. 20 Simonton D K. The blind-variation and selective-retention theory of creativity: recent developments and current status of BVSR[J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2023, 35(3): 304-323. 21 Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(1): 117-132. 22 Kaplan S, Vakili K. The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(10): 1435-1457. 23 Anderson P, Tushman M L. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(4): 604-633. 24 Walshok M L, Shapiro J D, Owens N. Transnational innovation networks aren’t all created equal: towards a classification system[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014, 39(3): 345-357. 25 Chandy R K, Tellis G J. The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2000, 64(3): 1-17. 26 Schoenmakers W, Duysters G. The technological origins of radical inventions[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(8): 1051-1059. 27 韩芳, 张生太, 冯凌子, 等. 基于专利文献技术融合测度的突破性创新主题识别——以太阳能光伏领域为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(12): 137-147. 28 Aharonson B S, Schilling M A. Mapping the technological landscape: measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(1): 81-96. 29 Sood A, Tellis G J. Technological evolution and radical innovation[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69(3): 152-168. 30 苏屹, 林周周, 欧忠辉. 基于突变理论的技术创新形成机理研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(3): 568-574. 31 Funk R J, Owen-Smith J. A dynamic network measure of technological change[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(3): 791-817. 32 Arthur W B. The structure of invention[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(2): 274-287. 33 Singh J, Fleming L. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: myth or reality?[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(1): 41-56. 34 Hargadon A. How breakthroughs happen: the surprising truth about how companies innovate[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003. |
|
|
|