|
|
|
| Review of the Research on Relationship between Science and Technology |
| Dong Kun1, 2, Xu Haiyun1, 3, Luo Rui1, 2, Wang Chao1, 2, Fang Shu1 |
1. Chengdu Documentation and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
3. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China (ISTIC), Beijing 100038 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Science and technology are the important forces that determine the trend of scientific and technological innovation. The in-depth analysis of knowledge association and interaction mechanism between science and technology is an important prerequisite to accurately grasp the law of development trends in science and technology as well as promote policies for the transformation of innovative results. This study focuses on the research of science-technology correlation analysis and analyzes the current status of research from three aspects: the conceptual connotation of science and technology, science-technology correlation analysis method, and science-technology interaction mode. It also indicates the inadequacy of the existing research and the future research prospects. The research indicates that the concepts of science and technology are different but related to each other and have complex knowledge relations and interactions. Nevertheless, quantitative analysis is the mainstream method to analyze the relationship between science and technology mostly through the correlation analysis of papers and patents. In the future, we will enhance the accuracy of classification of the research data, reveal the semantic association of science and technology from the text-content level, introduce more standards to further divide the scientific-technical interaction modes, as well as improve the practical value of the research.
|
|
Received: 20 December 2017
|
|
|
|
[1] 中华人民共和国科学技术部. 国务院关于印发“十三五”国家科技创新规划的通知. http://www.most.gov.cn/mostinfo/ xinxifenlei/gjkjgh/201608/t20160810_127174.htm. 2017-08-25.
[2] 白春礼. 加速科技成果转化, 推动科技供给侧改革[N]. 学习时报, 2017-02-10(A1).
[3] Tokuhama-Espinosa T.Mind, brain, and education science: a comprehensive guide to the new brain-based teaching[M]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.
[4] Lindberg D C.The beginnings of western science[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.
[5] 梦海. 科学的概念、范围和界限——论卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯的科学观[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2007, 29(3): 1-5.
[6] 辞海编辑委员会. 辞海[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 1999.
[7] 倪天成. 关于科学的定义之我见[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 1987(2): 77.
[8] 吴国盛. 究竟什么是科学(上)[J]. 中国经济报告, 2014(3): 8-11.
[9] Feynman R.What is science?[J]. Resonance, 2011, 16(9): 860-873.
[10] 高永明. 也谈科学的定义[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 1988(3): 42.
[11] 钱时惕. 什么是科学——科学与人文漫话之一[J]. 物理通报, 2009(10): 56-58.
[12] 王秀华, 陈凡. 亚里士多德技术观考[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2005, 22(4): 86-88.
[13] 许良. 技术哲学[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2005.
[14] 海德格尔, 孙周兴. 海德格尔选集(下)[M]. 上海: 生活・读书・新知三联书店上海分店, 1996.
[15] McGinn R E. Science, technology, and society[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1998: 497-498.
[16] Arthur W B.The structure of invention[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(2): 274-287.
[17] 钱时惕. 什么是技术及科学与技术的关系——科学与人文漫话之二[J]. 物理通报, 2009(11): 55-56.
[18] 陈士俊. 广义技术的定义、本质及表现形态[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 1989(2): 51-55.
[19] 张彦. 论科学与技术在社会学上的三个主要区别[J]. 南京社会科学, 1998(8): 31-36.
[20] 陈昌曙. 技术哲学引论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
[21] Almutairi A, Everatt J, Snape P, et al.Exploring the relationship between science and technology in the curriculum[J]. Australasian Journal of Technology Education, 2014, 1: 49-63.
[22] 罗玉中, 欧琳, 郑天姝. 基础研究和应用基础研究[EB/OL]. http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=94915&do=blog&id=435743. 2017-10-09.
[23] 杨长桂. 论我国基础性研究部门构成的合理调整[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 1992(4): 79-85.
[24] 杰恩. 研发组织管理——用好天才团队[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2005(4): 84.
[25] 齐曼·约翰. 元科学导论[M]. 长沙: 湖南人民出版社, 1988.
[26] 易显飞. 论“技术先于科学”——一种对技术与科学关系的存在论解释[J]. 内蒙古社会科学(汉文版), 2012, 33(6): 47-51.
[27] Queraltó R.Technology as a new condition of the possibility of scientific knowledge[J]. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 1998, 4(2): 136-140.
[28] Rip A.Science and technology as dancing partners[M]// Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age. Springer Netherlands, 1992: 231-270.
[29] Schoenmakers W, Duysters G.The technological origins of radical inventions[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(8): 1051-1059.
[30] 张金柱. 基于引用科学知识突变的突破性创新识别方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2013.
[31] Fitzpatrick A.Teller’s technical nemesis: The American Hydrogen Bomb and its development within a technological infrastructure[J]. Digital Library & Archives of the Virginia Tech University Libraries, 1998.
[32] 巨乃岐, 刘冠军. 从科学与技术的关系看科学向技术转化的实质与要求[J]. 河南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004, 44(1): 24-28.
[33] Bassecoulard E, Zitt M.Patents and publications[M]// Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer Netherlands, 2004: N2-N3.
[34] 李醒民. 科学和技术异同论[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2007, 29(1): 1-9.
[35] 王建芳. 基于计量的科技知识演化关系分析方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2007.
[36] 刘小玲, 谭宗颖, 张超星. 国内外“科学-技术关系”研究方法述评——聚焦文献计量方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(13): 142-148.
[37] 布什. 科学——没有止境的前沿[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2004.
[38] 经济合作与发展组织. 弗拉斯卡蒂手册[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2010.
[39] 澳大利亚科学技术委员会. 基础科学与国家目标[M]. 澳大利亚政府出版局, 1984.
[40] D. E.司托克斯. 基础科学与技术创新[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[41] Guan J C, He Y.Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science—technology linkages[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(3): 403-425.
[42] Gardner P.Representations of the relationship between science and technology in the curriculum[J]. Studies in Science Education, 1994, 24(1): 1-28.
[43] Hu D, Chen H, Huang Z, et al.Longitudinal study on patent citations to academic research articles in nanotechnology (1976-2004)[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2007, 9(4): 529-542.
[44] Narin F, Noma E.Is technology becoming science?[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 7(3-6): 369-381.
[45] Schmoch U.Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators[J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 26(1): 193-211.
[46] Thomas P, McMillan G S. Using science and technology indicators to manage R&D as a business[J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2015, 13(3): 9-14.
[47] 董珏, 杨眉, 郭晶, 等. 面向高校科技转化效率评估的“科学-技术”关联性实证研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2016(5): 38-45.
[48] Chen C, Hicks D.Tracing knowledge diffusion[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(2): 199-211.
[49] 中华人民共和国国家知识产权局. TOP25全球最具创新力的政府研究机构评析. http://www.sipo.gov.cn/zlssbgs/zlyj/201609/ t20160907_1290661. html. 2017-08-10.
[50] 白光祖, 郑玉荣, 吴新年, 等. 基于文献知识关联的颠覆性技术预见方法研究与实证[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(9): 38-44.
[51] Stolpe M.Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(7): 1181-1198.
[52] Park G, Park Y.On the measurement of patent stock as knowledge indicators[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2006, 73(7): 793-812.
[53] Glänzel W, Meyer M.Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of'reverse'citation relations[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2): 415-428.
[54] Meyer M, Debackere K, Glänzel W.Can applied science be ‘good science’? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(2): 527-539.
[55] 高继平, 姚长青, 马峥, 等. 论文专利互引分析方法的应用及其不足——在科学技术关联分析方面[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2014(12): 39-44.
[56] 高继平, 丁堃, 滕立, 等. 专利-论文混合共被引网络下的知识流动探析[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(8): 1184-1189.
[57] Gao J P, Teng L, Pang J.Hybrid documents co-citation analysis: Making sense of the interaction between science and technology in technology diffusion[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 93(2): 459-471.
[58] Huang M H, Yang H W, Chen D Z.Increasing science and technology linkage in fuel cells: A cross citation analysis of papers and patents[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(2): 237-249.
[59] 吴菲菲, 黄鲁成, 石媛嫄. 基于文献和专利相互引用的科学与技术关系分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34(10): 13-20.
[60] 青年东大说. 东南大学专利引用文献数量位列全球第一. http://www.sohu.com/a/164196770_656118.2017-09-01.
[61] Wang G B, Guan J C.Measuring science-technology interactions using patent citations and author-inventor links: an exploration analysis from Chinese nanotechnology[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2011, 13(12): 27-42.
[62] 王刚波, 官建成. 纳米科学与技术之间的联系: 基于学术型发明人的分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(12): 71-79.
[63] Forti E, Sobrero M, Franzoni C.The effect of patenting on the networks and connections of academic scientists[C]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2007: 272-284.
[64] 张俊. 科学与技术的关联性研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014.
[65] Verbeek A, Debackere K, Luwel M, et al.Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(3): 399-420.
[66] 李睿, 容军凤, 张玲玲. 试论“科学-技术关联”计量模型的不足及改进——学科-领域对应优化视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(5): 86-93.
[67] 赖院根, 曾建勋. 期刊论文与专利文献的整合框架研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(4): 109-112.
[68] 赖院根. 期刊论文与专利文献的链接研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2011(1): 63-69.
[69] 李睿. 专利引文分析法与共词分析法在揭示科学-技术知识关联方面的差异对比[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(6): 91-93.
[70] Callon M, Courtial J P, Laville F.Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry[J]. Scientometrics, 1991, 22(1): 155-205.
[71] Finardi U.Time relations between scientific production and patenting of knowledge: the case of nanotechnologies[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(1): 37-50.
[72] 文晓芬. 基于专利引文的我国基础研究与技术创新的关联分析[D]. 北京: 中国科学技术信息研究所, 2011.
[73] 殷媛媛. 基于论文专利引证关系的科学技术互动研究——以立体显示为实证分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(16): 65-70, 74.
[74] Huang M H, Chen S H, Lin C Y, et al.Exploring temporal relationships between scientific and technical fronts: a case of biotechnology field[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2): 1085-1100.
[75] 桂婕. 基础研究与专利发明之间的关系测度研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2007.
[76] 张旭, 佟贺丰, 傅俊英. 基于事实型数据的科技评价与预测方法研究: 以DNA测序技术为例[J]. 情报学报, 2011, 30(9): 911-915.
[77] 吴曼. 基于科学计量的知识生产和技术开发时间关联分析[D]. 北京: 中国科学技术信息研究所, 2013. |
|
|
|
