|
|
|
| Relationship between University Patents Transformation with Inventor Team Characteristics |
| Li Rui1, Luo Shuang2, Kang Xinyu1,3 |
1.Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207
2.School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064
3.WMG, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL |
|
|
|
|
Abstract There is a sharp contrast between the high number of patent applications and the low commercialization rate of universities in China. Through an empirical study of patents successfully commercialized by 25 universities, this paper finds that, first, inventor team sizes for commercialized patents have an inverted U-shaped distribution, and four-person teams perform best. Second, university-enterprise collaborative teams of multi-source inventors are not conducive to patent transformation. Third, there is no positive correlation between team members’ invention experience and patent commercialization. Finally, the multiple knowledge structures of the team are not conducive to patent conversion, but a single centralized knowledge structure is more advantageous. This paper uses the theory of team conflict, sticky information, and endowment effect to make attributions to the research results and puts forward corresponding suggestions for university research management.
|
|
Received: 11 May 2022
|
|
|
|
1 约瑟夫·熊彼特. 经济发展理论[M]. 何畏, 易家详, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2020.
2 徐小钦. 科学技术哲学概论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
3 拉普. 技术哲学导论[M]. 刘武, 康荣平, 吴明泰, 译. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社, 1986.
4 布朗温·霍尔, 内森·罗森伯格. 创新经济学手册(第一卷)[M]. 上海市科学学研究所, 译. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2017.
5 Liu K. Human capital, social collaboration, and patent renewal within U.S. pharmaceutical firms[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(2): 616-636.
6 Coff R, Kryscynski D. Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages[J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(5): 1429-1443.
7 Arik M, Geho P. Resource-based theory and STEM workforce dynamics: strategic implications for businesses and regions[J]. Global Journal of Business Disciplines, 2017, 1(1): 16-35.
8 孙玉涛, 张瑛. “明星发明人”研究评述: 内涵、分类与测量[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(8): 157-167.
9 季小天, 赵文华. 研究型大学一流科研创新团队的影响因素分析——以国家自然科学基金委创新研究群体为样本[J]. 科学管理研究, 2021, 39(6): 43-53.
10 陈光华, 梁嘉明, 杨国梁. 研发团队特征对产学研合作创新的影响研究[J]. 软科学, 2014, 28(12): 15-18.
11 付晔, 张乐平, 马强, 等. R&D资源投入对不同类型高校专利产出的影响[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2010, 22(3): 103-111.
12 Denicolò V, Franzoni L A. The contract theory of patents[J]. International Review of Law and Economics, 2003, 23(4): 365-380.
13 支振锋. 科技创新亟需更高水平法治保障[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2021(20): 86-91.
14 Bayoumi M T, Coe D T, Laxton D. Liberating supply: fiscal policy and technological innovation in a multicountry model[M]. Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1998.
15 刘群彦. 科技成果产权激励与科研人员成果转化行为的关系研究——基于高校及科研院所的实证分析[J]. 中国高校科技, 2020(1): 120-124.
16 包健. 促进科技创新的税收激励政策分析[J]. 税务研究, 2017(12): 40-43.
17 Bronzini R, Piselli P. The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(2): 442-457.
18 汪翠翠. 基于科研团队特征的高校科研激励模式探析[J]. 科教文汇(下旬刊), 2010(3): 1-2.
19 罗建, 史敏, 彭清辉, 等. 核心利益相关者认知差异视角下高校科技成果转化问题及对策研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(13): 112-117.
20 胡琨, 王兴旺, 吉久明. 专利权人商品化动机及政策效果分析——以我国高校转化专利为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(6): 80-87.
21 Hausman J A, Hall B H, Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R & D relationship[J]. Econometrica, 1984, 52(4): 909-938.
22 van Vugt M, Iredale W. Men behaving nicely: public goods as peacock tails[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 2013, 104(1): 3-13.
23 陈艾华, 陈婵. 基于角色认同的学术创业协同创新机理——来自高校跨学科创业团队的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(3): 491-499, 555.
24 Abramo G, D’Angelo C A, Di Costa F. The effect of multidisciplinary collaborations on research diversification[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(1): 423-433.
25 周升学, 袁安府. 高校教师多元化、知识管理与团队创新绩效实证研究[J]. 社会科学战线, 2021(12): 244-248.
26 李玉清, 钱宝英, 田素妍, 等. 高校科技产出影响因素研究分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2005, 5(2): 50-54.
27 Huang S F, Chen J, Mei L, et al. The effect of heterogeneity and leadership on innovation performance: evidence from university research teams in China[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(16): 4441.
28 van Knippenberg D, Schippers M C. Work group diversity[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2007, 58: 515-541.
29 Zuo Z Y, Zhao K. The more multidisciplinary the better? The prevalence and interdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(3): 736-756.
30 Deutsch J M. Biophysics software for interdisciplinary education and research[J]. American Journal of Physics, 2014, 82(5): 442-450.
31 Ozuem W, Sarsby N. Value creation through heterogeneous cultural team-based environments: a multi-lens UK perspective[M]// Approaches to Managing Organizational Diversity and Innovation. Hershey: IGI Global, 2014: 124-147.
32 Sethi R. New product quality and product development teams[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2000, 64(2): 1-14.
33 White L P, Chang T J, Jone K Y, et al. The effects of new product development teams on new product quality: a Taiwanese-American comparison[J]. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 2008, 11(1): 14-39.
34 Ashkanasy N M, H?rtel C E J, Daus C S. Diversity and emotion: the new frontiers in organizational behavior research[J]. Journal of Management, 2002, 28(3): 307-338.
35 Jehn K A, Northcraft G B, Neale M A. Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(4): 741-763.
36 Daft R L, Lengel R H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design[J]. Management Science, 1986, 32(5): 554-571.
37 Hoegl M, Gemuenden H G. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence[J]. Organization Science, 2001, 12(4): 435-449.
38 Singh J, Fleming L. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: myth or reality?[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(1): 41-56.
39 Steiner I D. Group process and productivity[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
40 Reagans R, Zuckerman E W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams[J]. Organization Science, 2001, 12(4): 502-517.
41 晋琳琳, 李德煌. 科研团队学科背景特征对创新绩效的影响——以知识交流共享与知识整合为中介变量[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(1): 111-123, 144.
42 王磊, 李翠霞. 团队特征对高校科研团队个体创造力影响的跨层次研究——以团队知识整合能力为中介变量[J]. 软科学, 2016, 30(9): 75-78, 89.
43 陈建红. 基于Innography平台的高校专利情报分析研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(S2): 201-203.
44 秦奋, 高健, 宋晓丹. 基于Innography平台的高校专利分析研究——以卓越联盟高校专利质量分析为例[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2019(10): 97-105.
45 郑美玉. 基于Innography的农林类高校专利竞争力研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(1): 117-124.
46 姚柱, 张显春. 团队创新使命、隐性知识共享与团队创新绩效[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(7): 78-83, 97.
47 Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature[J]. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2009, 53(2): 143-151.
48 徐礼平, 李林英. 高校重大科研项目团队心理资本对创新绩效的影响[J]. 高校教育管理, 2019, 13(1): 55-64.
49 邢晓昭, 李善青. 科技成果转化成熟度评价指标体系研究——以结构方程模型为例[J]. 情报工程, 2018, 4(1): 52-66.
50 李睿, 徐璇, 赵安琪. 专利功能跨越度计量及其情报学意义——以城市治理领域专利为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(11): 96-100.
51 Hu N, Chen Z, Gu J B, et al. Conflict and creativity in inter-organizational teams: the moderating role of shared leadership[J]. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2017, 28(1): 74-102.
52 Hood A C, Cruz K S, Bachrach D G. Conflicts with friends: a multiplex view of friendship and conflict and its association with performance in teams[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2017, 32(1): 73-86.
53 Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms[J]. Organization Science, 1992, 3(2): 179-202.
54 Von Hippel E. “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation[J]. Management Science, 1994, 40(4): 429-439.
55 万涛. 冲突与和谐: 科技创新团队创新管理研究[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2021.
56 刘博, 沈菊琴. 界面及界面管理概念界定[J]. 华东经济管理, 2012, 26(9): 109-111.
57 Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[M]// Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making. Singapore: World Scientific, 2013: 99-127.
58 Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1980, 1(1): 39-60.
59 Brenner L, Rottenstreich Y, Sood S, et al. On the psychology of loss aversion: possession, valence, and reversals of the endowment effect[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2007, 34(3): 369-376.
60 张钢, 李慧慧, 刘建新. 领导力分布对知识型团队创造力的影响——案例研究[J]. 技术经济, 2018, 37(12): 36-44, 110.
61 Dawkins S, Martin A, Scott J, et al. Advancing conceptualization and measurement of psychological capital as a collective construct[J]. Human Relations, 2015, 68(6): 925-949. |
|
|
|
