|
|
Influence of Subject and Region Intersection in the Knowledge Exchange of Scientific Academic Collaboration in Digital Humanities |
Ye Guanghui1, Peng Ze1, Bi Chongwu2, Xia Lixin1 |
1.School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079 2.School of Information Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 |
|
|
Abstract To change the practice that previous studies were limited to in exploring the influence of a single measure of discipline or region crossover on knowledge exchange of academic collaboration, this study integrates two measures of such crossovers to analyze the complex influence process of these two measures on the formation of meta-network characteristics of knowledge flow of academic collaboration. First, we construct such a meta-network, and set up an index system for the analysis of the characteristics of nodes, subgroups, and the entire network. We then analyze the characteristics of the meta-network according to the calculated index values. The two sub-networks from the two measures of geographic and subject intersection are analyzed, and the characteristics of these two sub-networks in each dimension of node, sub-group, and the whole network are obtained. Finally, the relationship between the regional and the subject cross subnets and the meta-network characteristics of academic collaboration knowledge flow is established, and the function mechanism of subject cross and regional cross in the formation and evolution of the meta-network characteristics is obtained.
|
Received: 23 July 2021
|
|
|
|
1 夏立新, 李明倩, 叶光辉, 等. 跨地域科研协作研究进展[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(4): 168-176. 2 邱均平. 基于作者合作、引证、链接关系的知识交流研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2011(6): 4. 3 马翠嫦, 曹树金. 信息分散下的信息行为——基于国外图书情报学领域跨学科研究的回顾[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(1): 60-72. 4 Cronin B, Meho L I. The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(4): 551-564. 5 Cronin B, Pearson S. The export of ideas from information science[J]. Journal of Information Science, 1990, 16(6): 381-391. 6 叶光辉, 夏立新. 跨地域科研协作模式分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(3): 79-95. 7 叶光辉, 余中洁, 李明倩. 多维邻近性对美国城市间科研协作的影响[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(11): 86-91, 27. 8 Glückler J. Economic geography and the evolution of networks[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2007, 7(5): 619-634. 9 Katz J S. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, 31(1): 31-43. 10 Fabrizio K R. Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(2): 255-267. 11 Schwartz M, Peglow F, Fritsch M, et al. What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? —Project-level evidence from Germany[J]. Technovation, 2012, 32(6): 358-369. 12 D’Este P, Iammarino S. The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2010, 89(2): 335-350. 13 张萃, 欧阳冬平. “一带一路”战略下中国国际科研合作影响因素研究——基于Web of Science数据库中外合作科研论文的实证分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2017(4): 74-82. 14 谭春辉, 朱宸良, 苟凡. 虚拟学术社区中科研人员合作行为影响因素研究——基于质性分析法与实证研究法相结合的视角[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(2): 52-58, 108. 15 游小珺. 多维邻近视角下美国高校科研合作的空间演化与动力机制研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2018. 16 Barwick M A, Boydell K M, Stasiulis E, et al. Knowledge transfer and implementation of evidence-based practices in children’s mental health[R]. Toronto: Chirdren’s Mental Health Ontario, 2005: 24-26. 17 邱均平, 杨思洛, 宋艳辉. 知识交流研究现状可视化分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(2): 78-89. 18 王惠, 王树乔. 图书情报类期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J]. 情报科学, 2017, 35(3): 134-138, 156. 19 甘春梅, 王伟军, 田鹏. 学术博客知识交流与共享心理诱因研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(3): 91-99. 20 孙冰, 徐晓菲, 苏晓. 技术扩散主路径及核心企业的识别研究——以手机芯片专利引文网络为例[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(2): 201-208. 21 叶光辉, 彭泽, 毕崇武, 等. 引文内容视角下的引文网络知识流量研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(12): 11-18. 22 彭泽, 叶光辉, 毕崇武, 等. 引文内容视角下的引文网络知识流动路径分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(12): 19-25, 10. 23 叶光辉, 彭泽, 毕崇武, 等. 引文内容视角下的引文网络知识流动特征研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(12): 4-10. 24 毕崇武, 叶光辉, 彭泽, 等. 基于标签语义关联的城市社群发现研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(3): 14-23. 25 Moran P A P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena[J]. Biometrika, 1950, 37(1/2): 17-23. |
|
|
|