|
|
|
| Research on Iterative Innovation Path of Co-citation Analysis Method |
| Song Ge1,2 |
1.The Institution of Information Science & Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096
2.School of Economics & Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the field of scientific research, iterative innovation is the principal method for spreading and developing original innovation. This study takes co-citation analysis as a typical case to explore the basic characteristics of iterative innovation in scientific research. From the analysis of the overall trend, innovation stage, iteration path, and interdisciplinary iteration innovation of the co-citation analysis method, it is found that its characteristics include the continuous call for the core content of original innovation and the introduction and integration of relevant knowledge; problem-oriented iterative adjustment; the accumulation of micro-innovation, which promotes the original innovation; and the existence of a “Silent period” before the scale of iteration innovation is formed. The wide spread of disciplines not only promotes iterative innovation, different disciplines such as innovation-occurred disciplines, innovation-assisted disciplines, and innovative adoption disciplines also have different “roles” in iterative innovation. It was also found that sustained iterative innovation depends on the support of the external environment.
|
|
Received: 30 January 2019
|
|
|
|
1 王建芳, 冷伏海. 共引分析理论与实践进展[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2006, 32(1): 85-88.
2 Kessler M M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers[J]. American Documentation, 1963, 14(1): 10-25.
3 Small H. Co-citation in scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, 24(4): 265-269.
4 张腾, 王迎军. 迭代式创新的研究与实践发展[J]. 现代管理科学, 2016(10): 100-102.
5 Fitzgerald E, Wankerl A, Schramm C. Inside real innovation: How the right approach can move ideas from R&D to market—and get the economy moving[M]. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2011: 36-42.
6 黛安娜·克兰. 无形学院——知识在科学共同体的扩散[M]. 刘珺珺, 顾昕, 王德禄, 译. 北京:华夏出版社, 1988: 63-64.
7 宋歌. 学术创新的扩散过程研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(1): 62-75.
8 罗杰斯. 创新的扩散[M]. 辛欣, 译. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2002: 86-90.
9 Otte E, Rousseau R. Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2002, 28(6): 441-453.
10 Chen C M. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
11 Small H. A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal-study of collagen research[J]. Social Studies of Science, 1977, 7(2): 139-166.
12 Small H, Greenlee E. Citation context analysis of a co-citation cluster: Recombinant-DNA[J]. Scientometrics, 1980, 2(4): 277-301.
13 Small H. Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1980, 36(3): 183-196.
14 Small H. The relationship of information-science to the social-sciences: A co-citation analysis[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1981, 17(1): 39-50.
15 Small H. Macro-level changes in the structure of co-citation clusters: 1983-1989[J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 26(1): 5-20.
16 Small H. A Sci-Map case-study: Building a map of AIDS research[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, 30(1): 229-241.
17 White H D, Griffith B C. Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981, 32(3): 163-171.
18 McCain K W. Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal co-citation analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991, 42(4): 290-296.
19 Mogee M E, Kolar R G. Patent co-citation analysis of Eli Lilly & Co. patents[J]. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, 1999, 9(3): 291-305.
20 Moya-AnegónF, Vargas-QuesadaB, Herrero-SolanaV, et al. A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 61(1): 129-145.
21 Porter A L, RafolsI. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 719-745.
22 Su Y M, Hsu P Y, PaiN Y. An approach to discover and recommend cross-domain bridge-keywords in document banks[J]. The Electronic Library, 2010, 28(5): 669-687.
23 White H D, GriffithB C. Authors as markers of intellectual space: Co-citation in studies of science, technology and society[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1982, 38(4): 255-272.
24 Faba-Pérez C, Guerrero-Bote V P, de Moya-AnegónF. Data mining in a closed Web environment[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(3): 623-640.
25 Park J, Seok S, Park H W. Web feature and co-mention analyses of open data 500 on education companies[J]. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 2016, 18(4): 2067-2078.
26 Prime C, Bassecoulard E, Zitt M. Co-citations and co-sitations: A cautionary view on an analogy[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(2): 291-308.
27 McCainK W. Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1990, 41(6): 433-443.
28 Zhao D Z. Towards all-author co-citation analysis[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2006, 42(6): 1578-1591.
29 Eom S. All author cocitation analysis and first author cocitation analysis: A comparative empirical investigation[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2008, 2(1): 53-64.
30 Schneider J W, Larsen B, Ingwersen P. A comparative study of first and all-author co-citation counting, and two different matrix generation approaches applied for author co-citation analyses[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(1): 103-130.
31 Chang C K N, Breitzman A. Using patents prospectively to identify emerging, high-impact technological clusters[J]. Research Evaluatio, 2009, 18(5): 357-364.
32 Jeong Y K, Song M, Ding Y. Content-based author co-citation analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(1): 197-211.
33 Qiu J P, Dong K, Yu H Q. Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1345-1360.
34 Bu Y, Liu T Y, Huang W B. MACA: a modified author co-citation analysis method combined with general descriptive metadata of citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 108(1): 143-166.
35 Wang F F, Wang X H, Yang S L. Mining author relationship in scholarly networks based on tripartite citation analysis[J]. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(11): e0187653.
36 Chen C M. Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1999, 35(3): 401-420.
37 Housner L D, Gomez R L, Griffey D C. Pedagogical knowledge structures in prospective teachers: Relationships to performance in a teaching methodology course[J]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1993, 64(2): 167-177.
38 White H D, McCain K W. Visualization of literatures[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1997, 32: 99-168.
39 White H D, McCain K W. Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(4): 327-355.
40 Small H. Visualizing science by citation mapping[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(9): 799-813.
41 Chen C M. Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1999, 35(3): 401-420.
42 Small H, Sweeney E, Greenlee E. Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping Science[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(5-6): 321-340.
43 Lin X. Map displays for information retrieval[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997, 48(1): 40-54.
44 Kohonen T. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps[J]. Biological Cybernetics, 1982, 43(1): 59-69.
45 Chen C M, Ibekwe-SanjuanF, HouJ H. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(7): 1386-1409.
46 Boyack K W, Small H, Klavans R. Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(9): 1759-1767.
47 Jeong Y K, Song M, Ding Y. Content-based author co-citation analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(1): 197-211.
48 Lin X, White H D, BuzydlowskiJ. Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2003, 39(5): 689-706.
49 Teng J T C, Galletta D F. MIS research directions: A survey of researchers views[J]. ACM SIGMIS Database, 1991, 22(1-2): 53-62.
50 Eom S B. Mapping the intellectual structure of research in decision support systems through author cocitation analysis (1971-1993)[J]. Decision Support Systems, 1996, 16(4): 315-338.
51 Peteraf M, di Stefano G, Verona G. The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(12): 1389-1410.
52 Dagnino G B, Levanti G, Minà A, et al. Interorganizational network and innovation: A bibliometric study and proposed research agenda[J]. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2015, 30(3-4): 354-377.
53 Zupic I, ?ater T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2015, 18(3): 429-472.
54 Leydesdorff L, Rafols I. A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(2): 348-362.
55 Small H. Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: Co-citation contexts and the role of analogy[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(3): 835-849.
56 步一, 刘天祎, 赵丹群, 等. 国外作者共引分析研究评述[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(12): 48-53. |
|
|
|
