|
|
|
| Study on Citation Characteristics of SEP from an Ecological Perspective |
| Li Rui, Zhou Wei, Wang Xue |
1. Sichuan University, School of Public Administration, Department of Information Management, Chengdu 610064;
2. Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd. of Chain Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610021 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Standard essential patents (SEP) This abbreviation can be removed from here as this does not appear again in the abstract. are patents contained in industry technical standards, i.e., if a patent is not used, the technical standards will not be enforced. In order to meet the industry technical standards, enterprises must obtain the license of standard-essential patents. Therefore, standard essential patent information is an important competitive intelligence. Based on the analysis of Qualcomm’s patent samples, this paper summarizes the citation characteristics of standard essential patents that differ from ordinary patents, and tests the repeatability of the features found by Huawei and ZTE’s patent samples. Finally, it was found that The use of this word in this context seems inappropriate. Please see if this can be replaced with “results indicate” or “It was found that”the citation characteristics of standard essential patents are analysis and interpretation from the perspective of citation ecology. This paper also aims to provide references based on citation features for patent intelligence workers to identify and foresee “potential” future standard essential patents.
|
|
Received: 07 November 2017
|
|
|
|
[1] F Narin.Patent bibliometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, 30(1): 147-155.
[2] CHI Research Inc. Patent technology indicators[EB/OL]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.23.4124&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[3] European Telecommunications Standards Institute. ETSI[EB/OL].[2016-07-24]. https://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/ ETSI.
[4] Pór G.The ecology of knowledge: A field of theory and practice,key to research & technology development[EB/OL]. [2018-09- 12].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278017162_The_ Ecology_of_Knowledge_a_Field_of_Theory_and_Practice_Key_ to_Research_Technology_Development.
[5] 孙振领, 李后卿. 关于知识生态系统的理论研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2008(5): 22-27, 58.
[6] 孙振领. 国内外知识生态学研究综述[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(3): 469-474.
[7] 和金生, 李江. 知识发展的类生物模型[J]. 科学学研究, 2008, 26(4): 679-684.
[8] 白献阳, 张海卿. 知识生态系统模型研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2012(23): 2-6, 12.
[9] 刘玉仙, 武夷山. 关于引文本质的思考[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(12): 1779-1786, 1882.
[10] 李正风, 梁永霞. 引文动机的生态学解释[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(4): 487-494.
[11] 梁永霞, 刘则渊, 杨中楷. 引文分析学的知识流动理论探析[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(5): 668-674.
[12] 汪社教. 竞争情报的知识生态学视角[J]. 南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 12(1): 46-50.
[13] 张凌志. 知识进化下知识变异的来源、条件与过程研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2011, 30(8): 180-184.
[14] 宫平. 图书馆知识生态系统探析[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2008.
[15] 陈国强. 新词语大词典[M]. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 1990: 139.
[16] 牛龙菲, 张一凯. 知识生态学: 对人类与知识实体关系的新探索[J]. 兰州大学学报, 1990, 18(1): 13-17.
[17] 杨思洛. 引文分析存在的问题及其原因探究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(3): 108-117.
[18] 马恒通. 文献与知识的进化[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2005, 27(6): 68-73, 38, 112.
[19] 孙振领, 李后卿. 关于知识生态系统的理论研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2008(5): 22-27, 58. |
|
|
|
