|
|
|
| Research on the Relationship between Interdisciplinarity of References and Academic Influence |
| Liu Jiaming1,2, Sun Jianjun1,3 |
1.Laboratory of Data Intelligence and Interdisciplinary Innovation, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
2.School of Digital Economics and Management, Nanjing University, Suzhou 215163
3.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Exploring the relationship between the interdisciplinarity of references and the academic influence of papers can provide suggestions for discipline construction; it is of great significance to promote the development of science. Based on journal and conference papers in bionics from 2001-2020, this paper discusses the relationship between references’ interdisciplinarity and papers’ academic influence from disciplinary variety, balance, and disparity. It compares the differences in four cooperation patterns. The result shows that the Rao-Stirling index has harmed academic influence, and there are thresholds for the positive impact of disciplinary variety, balance, and disparity perspectives. Additionally, the relationship between interdisciplinarity and academic influence varies in cooperation patterns. When engaging in interdisciplinary scientific research activities, the principle of moderation should be followed in the aspects of disciplinary variety, balance, and disparity. Different cooperation strategies should be adopted according to the types of collaborators. Researchers should actively communicate and cooperate with high-level international institutions. Colleges and universities should strengthen interdisciplinary training and cultivate compound talents.
|
|
Received: 01 August 2022
|
|
|
|
1 刘仲林. 交叉科学时代的交叉研究[J]. 科学学研究, 1993, 11(2): 9-16.
2 Steele T W, Stier J C. The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: a forestry case study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000, 51(5): 476-484.
3 刘雪立, 赵俊玲. 图书情报学期刊和论文的跨学科强度与其学术影响力的关系[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2021, 32(3): 411-417.
4 张雪, 刘昊, 张志强. 不同合作模式下的学科交叉程度与文献学术影响力关系研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(8): 164-172.
5 Yegros-Yegros A, Rafols I, D’Este P. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8): e0135095.
6 王菲菲, 贾晨冉, 刘俊婉, 等. 交叉学科中文献学术价值的成长与老化研究 ——以医学信息学为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(2): 11-22.
7 Chang Y W, Huang M H. A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: using three bibliometric methods[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(1): 22-33.
8 Larivière V, Gingras Y. On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(1): 126-131.
9 van Houten B A, Phelps J, Barnes M, et al. Evaluating scientific impact[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000, 108(9): A392-A393.
10 何春建. 单篇论文学术影响力评价指标构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(4): 98-107.
11 杨思洛. 引文分析存在的问题及其原因探究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(3): 108-117.
12 宋歌. 网络分析方法在引文分析中的整合研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(4): 106-114.
13 王雯霞, 刘春丽. 不同学科间论文影响力评价指标模型的差异性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(13): 108-116.
14 Cheung M K. Altmetrics: too soon for use in assessment[J]. Nature, 2013, 494(7436): 176.
15 Sugimoto C R, Ni C Q, Russell T G, et al. Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: an examination of dissertation networks in Library and Information Science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(9): 1808-1828.
16 Abramo G, D'Angelo C A, Di Costa F. Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(11): 2206-2222.
17 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 黄颖. 跨学科合作模式下的交叉科学测度研究——以ESI社会科学领域高被引学者为例[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(3): 231-242.
18 Porter A L, Cohen A S, Roessner J D, et al. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1): 117-147.
19 Wang X F, Wang Z N, Huang Y, et al. Measuring interdisciplinarity of a research system: detecting distinction between publication categories and citation categories[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(3): 2023-2039.
20 黄颖, 高天舒, 王志楠, 等. 基于Web of Science分类的跨学科测度研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(3): 124-132.
21 黄颖, 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 等. 跨学科的三维测度——外部知识融合、内在知识会聚与科学合作模式[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(1): 25-35.
22 华萌, 陈仕吉, 周群, 等. 多学科期刊论文学科划分方法研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(5): 76-80, 22.
23 章成志, 吴小兰. 跨学科研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(5): 523-535.
24 张雪, 张志强. 学科交叉研究系统综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 112-125.
25 Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719.
26 Rafols I, Meyer M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(2): 263-287.
27 Porter A L, Chubin D E. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(3): 161-176.
28 Porter A L, Rafols I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 719-745.
29 Leydesdorff L, Rafols I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(1): 87-100.
30 Hamers L, Hemeryck Y, Herweyers G, et al. Similarity measures in scientometric research: the Jaccard index versus Salton’s cosine formula[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1989, 25(3): 315-318.
31 Chen K H, Liang C F. Disciplinary interflow of library and information science[J]. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 2004, 2(2): 31-55.
32 Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(4): 623-656.
33 Simpson E H. Measurement of diversity[J]. Nature, 1949, 163(4148): 688.
34 Brillouin L, Hellwarth R W. Science and information theory[J]. Physics Today, 1956, 9(12): 39-40.
35 Grant R M, Jammine A P, Thomas H. Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1972-84[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31(4): 771-801.
36 Montgomery C A, Wernerfelt B. Diversification, ricardian rents, and Tobin’s Q[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1988, 19(4): 623-632.
37 Zhang L, Rousseau R, Gl?nzel W. Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: taking similarity between subject fields into account[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5): 1257-1265.
38 Bromham L, Dinnage R, Hua X. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7609): 684-687.
39 Leydesdorff L, Wagner C S, Bornmann L. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 255-269.
40 Leydesdorff L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(9): 1303-1319.
41 李长玲, 纪雪梅, 支岭. 基于E-I指数的学科交叉程度分析——以情报学等5个学科为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(16): 33-36.
42 Egghe L, Rousseau R. BRS-compactness in networks: theoretical considerations related to cohesion in citation graphs, collaboration networks and the Internet[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2003, 37(7/8): 879-899.
43 陈赛君, 陈智高. 领域交叉性分析指标与方法新探及其实证研究[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(11): 1184-1195.
44 Qin J, Lancaster F W, Allen B. Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997, 48(10): 893-916.
45 王文平, 刘云, 何颖, 等. 国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究——基于文献计量学分析的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(3): 127-137.
46 路甬祥. 仿生学的意义与发展[J]. 科学中国人, 2004(4): 22-24.
47 ESI journal list[EB/OL]. [2021-12-30]. http://esi.help.clarivate.com/Content/journal-list.htm.
48 Wang J, Thijs B, Gl?nzel W. Interdisciplinarity and impact: distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5): e0127298.
49 Leydesdorff L. A method for generating overlay maps on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citation relations in 2015[EB/OL]. [2021-12-30]. http://www.leydesdorff.net/wc15/index.htm.
50 梁春慧, 孙艳, 万跃华. 高被引论文的参考文献特征研究——以化学领域为例的实证分析[J]. 科技与出版, 2014(7): 119-122.
51 Smart J C, Bayer A E. Author collaboration and impact: a note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles[J]. Scientometrics, 1986, 10: 297-305.
52 Card D, DellaVigna S. Page limits on economics articles: evidence from two journals[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014, 28(3): 149-168.
53 孟璀, 吴培群, 于发友. 论文学术影响力及其影响因素的实证分析——以CNKI平台的教育内容分析论文为例[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(S1): 536-542.
54 Gazni A, Didegah F. Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(2): 251-265.
55 Lind J T, Mehlum H. With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2010, 72(1): 109-118. |
|
|
|
