网络媒体态势感知：基于系统性综述的理论框架构建

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.09.004

情报学报

2024, Vol. 43

Issue (9): 1046-1058 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.09.004

情报理论与方法

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

网络媒体态势感知：基于系统性综述的理论框架构建

黄梅银^1,2, 王芳^1,2, 刘清民^1,2

1.南开大学商学院信息资源管理系，天津 300071
2.南开大学网络社会治理研究中心，天津 300071

Online-Media Situation Awareness: Development of Theoretical Framework Based on Systematic Literature Review

Huang Meiyin^1,2, Wang Fang^1,2, Liu Qingmin^1,2

1.Department of Information Resources Management, Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071
2.Center for Network Society Governance, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (2025 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要当前网络媒体态势感知受到实务与学术界的重视，但相关研究较为分散。系统性文献综述有助于形成对网络媒体态势感知研究的系统性、全景式理解，增进不同具体领域之间的交流与对话。本文采用系统性文献综述方法对SSCI/SCI/CSSCI期刊论文进行分析，基于系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目（preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses，PRISMA）方法收集、锚定文献样本框，通过“自下而上”的编码方式对网络媒体态势感知研究内容进行分析和梳理。本文细化了网络媒体态势感知的“察觉、理解和预测”三层次框架。其中，察觉层包括内容察觉、时空察觉和情感察觉，理解层包括目标事件理解和热点事件理解，预测层包括内容突发预测、时空异常预测和情绪异常预测。在此基础上，构建了网络媒体态势感知“数据、察觉、理解和预测”四层次理论框架，并揭示了其理论与实践意义。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	黄梅银
	王芳
	刘清民

关键词 ：态势感知, 网络媒体, 系统性文献综述, PRISMA

收稿日期: 2023-06-12

基金资助:国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于数据共享与知识复用的数字政府智能化治理研究”（20ZDA039）。

作者简介: 黄梅银，女，1994年生，博士研究生，主要研究领域为政府数据治理；王芳，通信作者，女，1970年生，博士生导师，主要研究领域为知识发现、政府信息资源管理，E-mail：wangfangnk@nankai.edu.cn；刘清民，男，1993年生，博士研究生，主要研究领域为自然语言处理；

引用本文:

黄梅银, 王芳, 刘清民. 网络媒体态势感知：基于系统性综述的理论框架构建[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43(9): 1046-1058.
Huang Meiyin, Wang Fang, Liu Qingmin. Online-Media Situation Awareness: Development of Theoretical Framework Based on Systematic Literature Review. 情报学报, 2024, 43(9): 1046-1058.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.09.004 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2024/V43/I9/1046

1 Endsley M R. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT)[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. Piscataway: IEEE, 1988: 789-795.
2 Paul N R, Sahoo D, Balabantaray R C. Classification of crisis-related data on Twitter using a deep learning-based framework[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2023, 82(6): 8921-8941.
3 ben Khalifa M, Díaz Redondo R P, Vilas A F, et al. Identifying urban crowds using geo-located Social media data: a Twitter experiment in New York City[J]. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 2017, 48(2): 287-308.
4 Shan S Q, Zhao F, Wei Y G, et al. Disaster management 2.0: a real-time disaster damage assessment model based on mobile social media data—a case study of Weibo (Chinese Twitter)[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 115: 393-413.
5 Paradkar A S, Zhang C, Yuan F X, et al. Examining the consistency between geo-coordinates and content-mentioned locations in tweets for disaster situational awareness: a Hurricane Harvey study[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 73: 102878.
6 Rossi C, Acerbo F S, Ylinen K, et al. Early detection and information extraction for weather-induced floods using social media streams[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 30: 145-157.
7 Lu H, Zhu Y F, Shi K Z, et al. Using adverse weather data in social media to assist with city-level traffic situation awareness and alerting[J]. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(7): 1193.
8 Wang Y, Taylor J E. DUET: data-driven approach based on latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling[J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2019, 33(3): 04019023.
9 Alam F, Ofli F, Imran M. Processing social media images by combining human and machine computing during crises[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2018, 34(4): 311-327.
10 Bosch H, Thom D, Heimerl F, et al. ScatterBlogs2: real-time monitoring of microblog messages through user-guided filtering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2013, 19(12): 2022-2031.
11 Lu J, Zhang G Q, Wu F J. Team situation awareness using web-based fuzzy group decision support systems[J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2008, 1(1): 50-59.
12 Evchina Y, Puttonen J, Dvoryanchikova A, et al. Context-aware knowledge-based middleware for selective information delivery in data-intensive monitoring systems[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 43: 111-126.
13 Liberati A, Altman D G, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration[J]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009, 62(10): e1-e34.
14 Tai K T. Open government research over a decade: a systematic review[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2021, 38(2): 101566.
15 马鑫, 王芳. 元宇宙的概念、技术、应用与影响——一项系统性文献综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(18): 113-128.
16 Peary B D M, Shaw R, Takeuchi Y. Utilization of social media in the East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami and its effectiveness[J]. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 2012, 34(1): 3-18.
17 ?erban O, Thapen N, Maginnis B, et al. Real-time processing of social media with SENTINEL: a syndromic surveillance system incorporating deep learning for health classification[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2019, 56(3): 1166-1184.
18 曾大军, 曹志冬. 突发事件态势感知与决策支持的大数据解决方案[J]. 中国应急管理, 2013(11): 15-23.
19 张海涛, 栾宇, 周红磊, 等. 总体国家安全观下重大突发事件的智能决策情报体系研究[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(11): 1174-1187.
20 赵振营. 意识形态视角下网络舆情态势感知方法研究[J]. 情报科学, 2023, 41(1): 152-157, 173.
21 王秉, 史志勇, 周佳胜. 安全情报视域下的安全态势感知与塑造模型[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(1): 1-6.
22 周欢, 张培颖, 黄晓怡, 等. 事件系统视角下网络舆情态势感知研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2024, 43(2): 135-142, 117.
23 张海涛, 周红磊, 李佳玮, 等. 信息不完全状态下重大突发事件态势感知研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(9): 903-913.
24 徐元, 毛进, 李纲. 面向突发事件应急管理的社交媒体多模态信息分析研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(11): 1150-1163.
25 李纲, 王施运, 毛进, 等. 面向态势感知的国家安全事件图谱构建研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(11): 1164-1175.
26 王施运, 李白杨, 白云, 等. 面向国家安全场景的态势感知与分析方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(7): 178-183.
27 王伟, 杨建林, 梁继文. 融合情报思维的科技发展态势感知模式研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(3): 268-278.
28 Endsley M R. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems[J]. Human Factors, 1995, 37(1): 65-84.
29 Ning H S, Liu H, Ma J H, et al. Cybermatics: Cyber-physical-social-thinking hyperspace based science and technology[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2016, 56: 504-522.
30 You Y, Pekkola S. Meeting others—supporting situation awareness on the WWW[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2001, 32(1): 71-82.
31 Jiang L Y, Jayatilaka A, Nasim M, et al. Systematic literature review on cyber situational awareness visualizations[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 57525-57554.
32 Yin J, Lampert A, Cameron M, et al. Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2012, 27(6): 52-59.
33 Crooks A, Croitoru A, Stefanidis A, et al. #Earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system[J]. Transactions in GIS, 2013, 17(1): 124-147.
34 Franke U, Brynielsson J. Cyber situational awareness-a systematic review of the literature[J]. Computers & Security, 2014, 46: 18-31.
35 张涛, 马海群. 智能情报分析中数据与算法风险识别模型构建研究[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(8): 832-844.
36 白如江, 张玉洁, 赵梦梦, 等. 面向关联推理的智慧情报感知: 内涵、组织与路径[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(8): 31-37, 67.
37 Hevner A R, March S T, Park J, et al. Design science in information systems research[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2004, 28(1): 75-105.
38 吴雪华, 毛进, 陈思菁, 等. 突发事件应急行动支撑信息的自动识别与分类研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(8): 817-830.
39 Koshy R, Elango S. Multimodal tweet classification in disaster response systems using transformer-based bidirectional attention model[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35(2): 1607-1627.
40 Li Y, Cheng J X, Huang C, et al. NEDetector: automatically extracting cybersecurity neologisms from hacker forums[J]. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 2021, 58: 102784.
41 Deng Q, Liu Y, Liu X D, et al. Social media usage during disasters: exploring the impact of location and distance on online engagement[J]. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2020, 14(2): 183-191.
42 Lu H, Yuan S P. What motivates information sharing about disaster victims on social media? Exploring the role of compassion, sadness, expectancy violation, and enjoyment[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 63: 102431.
43 刘青川, 关斌, 包国宪. 突发性公共卫生事件中居民的风险信息感知研究——基于全国81个城市的调研数据[J]. 图书与情报, 2021(2): 40-53.
44 Bubendorff S, Rizza C, Prieur C. Construction and dissemination of information veracity on French social media during crises: comparison of Twitter and Wikipedia[J]. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2021, 29(2): 204-216.
45 Huang Q Y, Xiao Y. Geographic situational awareness: mining tweets for disaster preparedness, emergency response, impact, and recovery[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2015, 4(3): 1549-1568.
46 Lee C, Tien I. Probabilistic framework for integrating multiple data sources to estimate disaster and failure events and increase situational awareness[J]. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 2018, 4(4): 04018042.
47 Gross G A, Nagi R. Precedence tree guided search for the efficient identification of multiple situations of interest-AND/OR graph matching[J]. Information Fusion, 2016, 27: 240-254.
48 Zou Z Q, Gan H Y, Huang Q Y, et al. Disaster image classification by fusing multimodal social media data[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2021, 10(10): 636.
49 李纲, 张霁, 毛进, 等. 灾害事件下社交媒体图文相关性研究[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(11): 1223-1231.
50 Scheele C, Yu M Z, Huang Q Y. Geographic context-aware text mining: enhance social media message classification for situational awareness by integrating spatial and temporal features[J]. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2021, 14(11): 1721-1743.
51 Xu S S, Li S N, Huang W. A spatial-temporal-semantic approach for detecting local events using geo-social media data[J]. Transactions in GIS, 2020, 24(1): 142-173.
52 Deng Q, Liu Y, Zhang H, et al. A new crowdsourcing model to assess disaster using microblog data in typhoon Haiyan[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016, 84(2): 1241-1256.
53 Alam F, Ofli F, Imran M. Descriptive and visual summaries of disaster events using artificial intelligence techniques: case studies of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2020, 39(3): 288-318.
54 Fan C, Wu F S, Mostafavi A. A hybrid machine learning pipeline for automated mapping of events and locations from social media in disasters[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 10478-10490.
55 Yuan F X, Li M, Liu R, et al. Social media for enhanced understanding of disaster resilience during Hurricane Florence[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, 57: 102289.
56 Avvenuti M, Cresci S, Del Vigna F, et al. CrisMap: a big data crisis mapping system based on damage detection and geoparsing[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2018, 20(5): 993-1011.
57 Shibuya Y, Tanaka H. Using social media to detect socio-economic disaster recovery[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2019, 34(3): 29-37.
58 Gao Y Z, Wang S W, Padmanabhan A, et al. Mapping spatiotemporal patterns of events using social media: a case study of influenza trends[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2018, 32(3): 425-449.
59 Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Bosch H, et al. Thematic patterns in georeferenced tweets through space-time visual analytics[J]. Computing in Science & Engineering, 2013, 15(3): 72-82.
60 Wang Z Y, Ye X Y. Social media analytics for natural disaster management[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2018, 32(1): 49-72.
61 Kryvasheyeu Y, Chen H H, Obradovich N, et al. Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity[J]. Science Advances, 2016, 2(3): e1500779.
62 Saroj A, Pal S. Use of social media in crisis management: a survey[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 48: 101584.
63 Singh N, Roy N, Gangopadhyay A. Analyzing the emotions of crowd for improving the emergency response services[J]. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2019, 58: 101018.
64 Wang J H, Fan Y C, Palacios J, et al. Global evidence of expressed sentiment alterations during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2022, 6(3): 349-358.
65 Spinsanti L, Ostermann F. Automated geographic context analysis for volunteered information[J]. Applied Geography, 2013, 43: 36-44.
66 Kim J, Hastak M. Online human behaviors on social media during disaster responses[J]. Homeland Security Affairs, 2017, 13(SI): Article 14135.
67 Fan C, Jiang Y C, Mostafavi A. Social sensing in disaster city digital twin: integrated textual-visual-geo framework for situational awareness during built environment disruptions[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2020, 36(3): 04020002.
68 Lopez-Fuentes L, Farasin A, Zaffaroni M, et al. Deep learning models for road passability detection during flood events using social media data[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(24): 8783.
69 Singh J P, Dwivedi Y K, Rana N P, et al. Event classification and location prediction from tweets during disasters[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 283(1): 737-757.
70 李纲, 陈思菁, 毛进, 等. 自然灾害事件微博热点话题的时空对比分析[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(11): 1-15.
71 杨欣谊, 王伟, 朱恒民. 基于时序共词网络的社交平台话题检测与演化研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(5): 585-597.
72 Endsley M R. Designing for situation awareness in complex systems[C]// Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Symbiosis of Humans, Artifacts and Environment, 2001: 176-190.
73 Xie W, Zhu F D, Jiang J, et al. TopicSketch: real-time bursty topic detection from Twitter[C]// Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining. Piscataway: IEEE, 2013: 837-846.
74 Maurya A, Murray K, Liu Y D, et al. Semantic scan: detecting subtle, spatially localized events in text streams[OL]. (2016-02-13). http://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.04393.
75 Yao F, Wang Y. Towards resilient and smart cities: a real-time urban analytical and geo-visual system for social media streaming data[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 63: 102448.
76 Hswen Y, Yom-Tov E, Murti V, et al. Covidseeker: a geospatial temporal surveillance tool[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(3): 1410.
77 Thapen N, Simmie D, Hankin C, et al. DEFENDER: detecting and forecasting epidemics using novel data-analytics for enhanced response[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(5): e0155417.
78 董青岭. 大数据安全态势感知与冲突预测[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018(6): 172-182.
79 王明程, 李勇男. 面向国家安全风险的情报感知理论模型构建研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2024, 43(1): 106-113, 76.