科学研究的社会影响力评价：研究与实践进展

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2020.10.010

情报学报

2020, Vol. 39

Issue (10): 1114-1119 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2020.10.010

研究进展与文献综述

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

科学研究的社会影响力评价：研究与实践进展

苏娜

中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院，北京 100190

The Social Impact of Research: A Review of Theory and Assessment of Practice

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (6)

全文: PDF (907 KB) HTML (81 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要科学研究的社会影响力评价是当前科技评价和科学计量学研究中的一个前沿性问题。本文系统梳理了国内外对科学研究社会影响力评价的理论研究与实践进展，重点对社会影响力的内涵、评价模型、评价指标、评价方法等内容进行了总结，并介绍了国外开展的国家层面社会影响力评价的实践。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	苏娜

关键词 ：科学研究, 社会影响力, 学术评价

收稿日期: 2019-11-22

基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“科学研究社会影响力评价的理论与实证研究——基于行动者网络的视角”（71904183）。

作者简介: 苏娜，女，1983年生，博士，副研究员，主要研究领域为科学计量学与科研评价、科技政策，E-mail:suna@casisd.c；

引用本文:

苏娜. 科学研究的社会影响力评价：研究与实践进展[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(10): 1114-1119.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2020.10.010 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I10/1114

1 Bornmann L. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(2): 217-233.
2 Holbrook J B, Frodeman R. Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(3): 239-246.
3 van der Meulen B, Rip A. Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands[J]. Research Evaluation, 2000, 9(1): 11-25.
4 Bozeman B, Youtie J. Socio-economic impacts and public value of government-funded research: Lessons from four US National Science Foundation initiatives[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(8): 1387-1398.
5 Bozeman B, Sarewitz D. Public value mapping and science policy evaluation[J]. Minerva, 2011, 49(1): 1-23.
6 McNie E C, Parris A, Sarewitz D. Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(4): 884-895.
7 van Vught F, Ziegele F. Designing and testing the feasibility of a multidimensional global university ranking final report[R]. Enschede: CHEPS, University of Twente, 2011.
8 van den Brink H M, de Haas M, van den Heuvel J, et al. Evaluating the societal relevance of academic research: A guide[R]. The Hague: Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, 2010.
9 Molas-Gallart J, Salter A, Patel P, et al. Measuring third stream activities: Final report to the Russell Group of Universities[R]. Brighton: Science and Technology Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, 2002.
10 Salter A J, Martin B R. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review[J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(3): 509-532.
11 Alston J M, Pardey P G, James J S, et al. The economics of agricultural R&D[J]. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2009, 1(1): 537-566.
12 Evenson R E. Economic impacts of agricultural research and extension[M]// Handbook of Agricultural Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001: 573-628.
13 Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation[J]. Research Policy, 1991, 20(1): 1-12.
14 Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings[J]. Research Policy, 1998, 26(7-8): 773-776.
15 Narin F, Hamilton K S, Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science[J]. Research Policy, 1997, 26(3): 317-330.
16 Martin B R. The research excellence framework and the ‘impact agenda’: Are we creating a frankenstein monster?[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(3): 247-254.
17 Kamenetzky J R. Opportunities for impact: Statistical analysis of the National Science Foundation’s broader impacts criterion[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2013, 40(1): 72-84.
18 Spaapen J M, van Drooge L. Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(3): 211-218.
19 Donovan C, Hanney S. The ‘payback framework’ explained[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(3): 181-183.
20 Higher Education Funding Council for England. Decisions on assessing research impact[EB/OL] [2019-10-11]. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.abdn.ac.uk%2Fdocuments%2Fhefce-decisions-on-assessing-impact.docx.
21 Moed H F, Halevi G. Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(10): 1988-2002.
22 Godin B, Doré C. Measuring the impacts of science: Beyond the economic dimension[R/OL]. Helsinki: Helsinki Institute for Science and Technology Studies, 2005. http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_Dore_Impacts.pdf.
23 Milat A J, Bauman A E, Redman S. A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods[J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2015, 13: 18.
24 Donovan C. State of the art in assessing research impact: Introduction to a special issue[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(3): 175-179.
25 Klautzer L, Hanney S, Nason E, et al. Assessing policy and practice impacts of social science research: The application of the Payback Framework to assess the Future of Work programme[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(3): 201-209.
26 Scott J E, Blasinsky M, Dufour M, et al. An evaluation of the Mind-Body Interactions and Health Program: Assessing the impact of an NIH program using the Payback Framework[J]. Research Evaluation, 2011, 20(3): 185-192.
27 Spaapen J, van Drooge L, Propp T, et al. SIAMPI final report[EB/OL]. [2019-10-20]. http://www.siampi.eu/Content/SIAMPI_Final%20report.pdf.
28 Joly P B, Gaunand A, Colinet L, et al. ASIRPA: A comprehensive theory-based approach to assessing the societal impacts of a research organization[J]. Research Evaluation, 2015, 24(4): 440-453.
29 Bozeman B. Public value mapping of science outcomes: Theory and method[M]// Knowledge Flows and Knowledge Collectives: Understanding the Role of Science and Technology Policies in Development, 2003, 2: 3-48.
30 Douthwaite B, Kuby T, van de Fliert E, et al. Impact pathway evaluation: An approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2003, 78(2): 243-265.
31 王茜, 谭宗颖, 钱力. 科学研究社会影响力评价综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(14): 143-148.
32 Donovan C. The qualitative future of research evaluation[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2007, 34(8): 585-597.
33 Donovan C. The australian research quality framework: A live experiment in capturing the social, economic, environmental, and cultural returns of publicly funded research[J]. New Directions for Evaluation, 2008, 2008(118): 47-60.
34 Rymer L. Measuring the impact of research—The context for metric development[R]. Turner: Group of Eight, 2011.
35 Beise M, Stahl H. Public research and industrial innovations in Germany[J]. Research Policy, 1999, 28(4): 397-422.
36 Rau H, Goggins G, Fahy F. From invisibility to impact: Recognising the scientific and societal relevance of interdisciplinary sustainability research[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(1): 266-276.
37 Ruegg R, Feller I. A toolkit for evaluating public R&D investment: Models, methods, and findings from ATP’s first decade[R]. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2003.
38 Pedrini M, Langella V, Battaglia M A, et al. Assessing the health research??s social impact: A systematic review[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 114(3): 1227-1250.
39 Grant J. Evaluating the outcomes of biomedical research on healthcare[J]. Research Evaluation, 1999, 8(1): 33-38.
40 Lewison G, Sullivan R. The impact of cancer research: How publications influence UK cancer clinical guidelines[J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2008, 98(12): 1944-1950.
41 邱均平, 余厚强. 替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(19): 5-12.
42 邱均平, 余厚强. 基于影响力产生模型的替代计量指标分层研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(5): 53-58.
43 Bornmann L, Haunschild R, Marx W. Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: How often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(3): 1477-1495.
44 余厚强, 肖婷婷, 王曰芬, 等. 政策文件替代计量指标分布特征研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(5): 57-69.
45 Youtie J, Bozeman B, Jabbehdari S, et al. Credibility and use of scientific and technical information in policy making: An analysis of the information bases of the National Research Council’s committee reports[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(1): 108-120.
46 Wilsdon J, Allen L, Belfiore E, et al. The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management[R]. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2015.
47 Taylor M. Exploring the boundaries: How altmetrics can expand our vision of scholarly communication and social impact[J]. Information Standards Quarterly, 2013, 25(2): 27-32.
48 HEFCE. The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact: An initial analysis of Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014 impact case studies[R]. King’s College London and Digital Science, 2015.
49 Broader impacts criteria: What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?[EB/OL]. [2019-11-20]. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf022/bicexamples.pdf.
50 Cohen W M, Nelson R R, Walsh J P. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(1): 1-23.
51 Bastow S, Dunleavy P, Tinkler J. The impact of the social sciences: How academics and their research make a difference[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 2014.