吴丹, 唐源. 搜索引擎结果页面（SERP）研究述评[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(2): 220-230.
Wu Dan, Tang Yuan. A Review on the Search Engine Result Page (SERP). 情报学报, 2018, 37(2): 220-230.
[1] Rele R S, Duchowski A T.Using eye tracking to evaluate alternative search results interfaces[J]. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2005, 49(15): 1459-1463. [2] Kammerer Y, Gerjets P.How the interface design influences users’ spontaneous trustworthiness evaluations of web search results: comparing a list and a grid interface[C]// Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 299-306. [3] Ostergren M, Yu S Y, Efthimiadis E N.The value of visual elements in web search[C]// Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 867-868. [4] Woodruff A, Rosenholtz R, Morrison J B, et al.A comparison of the use of text summaries, plain thumbnails, and enhanced thumbnails for Web search tasks[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53(2): 172-185. [5] Teevan J, Cutrell E, Fisher D, et al.Visual snippets: summarizing web pages for search and revisitation[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2009: 2023-2032. [6] Loumakis F, Stumpf S, Grayson D.This image smells good: effects of image information scent in search engine results pages[C]// Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM Press, 2011: 475-484. [7] Joho H, Jose J M.A comparative study of the effectiveness of search result presentation on the Web[C]// Proceedings of the European Conference on Advances in Information Retrieval. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006: 302-313. [8] Kim J, Thomas P, Sankaranarayana R, et al.What snippet size is needed in mobile Web search?[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2017: 97-106. [9] Sweeney S, Crestani F.Effective search results summary size and device screen size: Is there a relationship?[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2006, 42(4): 1056-1074. [10] Gossen T, Höbel J, Nürnberger A.A comparative study about children’s and adults’ perception of targeted web search engines[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2014: 1821-1824. [11] Gossen T, Höbel J, Nürnberger A.Usability and perception of young users and adults on targeted web search engines[C]// Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium. New York: ACM Press, 2014: 18-27. [12] Druin A, Foss E, Hutchinson H, et al.Children’s roles using keyword search interfaces at home[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 413-422. [13] Bilal D, Gwizdka J. Children’s eye-fixations on google search results[C]// Proceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & Technology. Silver Springs: American Society for Information Science, 2016: Article No. 89. [14] Dinet J, Bastien J M C, Kitajima M. What, where and how are young people looking for in a search engine results page?: impact of typographical cues and prior domain knowledge[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 105-112. [15] Lagun D, Hsieh C H, Webster D, et al.Towards better measurement of attention and satisfaction in mobile search[C]// Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2014: 113-122. [16] Liu Z Y, Liu Y Q, Zhou K, et al.Influence of vertical result in Web search examination[C]// Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2015: 193-202. [17] Wang C, Liu Y Q, Zhang M, et al.Incorporating vertical results into search click models[C]// Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2013: 503-512. [18] Bar-Ilan J, Keenoy K, Levene M, et al.Presentation bias is significant in determining user preference for search results—A user study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(1): 135-149. [19] Zhou K, Cummins R, Lalmas M, et al.Evaluating aggregated search pages[C]// Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2012: 115-124. [20] Wang Y, Yin D W, Jie L, et al.Beyond ranking: Optimizing whole-page presentation[C]// Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York: ACM Press, 2016: 103-112. [21] Kiseleva J, Williams K, Awadallah A H, et al.Predicting user satisfaction with intelligent assistants[C]// Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2016: 45-54. [22] Kiseleva J, Williams K, Jiang J P, et al.Understanding user satisfaction with intelligent assistants[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2016: 121-130. [23] Jones M, Marsden G, Mohd-Nasir N, et al.Improving Web interaction on small displays[J]. Computer Networks, 1999, 31(11-16): 1129-1137. [24] Dillon A, Richardson J, McKnight C. The effects of display size and text splitting on reading lengthy text from screen[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1990, 9(3): 215-227. [25] Duchnicky R L, Kolers P A.Readability of text scrolled on visual display terminals as a function of window size[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1983, 25(6): 683-692. [26] Kim J, Thomas P, Sankaranarayana R, et al.Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior and performance in web search on large and small screens[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(3): 526-544. [27] Kelly D, Azzopardi L.How many results per page?: A study of SERP size, search behavior and user experience[C]// Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2015: 183-192. [28] Oulasvirta A, Hukkinen J P, Schwartz B.When more is less: the paradox of choice in search engine use[C]// Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2009: 516-523. [29] Kim J.User interaction in mobile Web search[C]// Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New Yrok: ACM Press, 2016: 1189. [30] Raptis D, Tselios N, Kjeldskov J, et al.Does size matter?: Investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users’ perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency[C]// Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. New Yrok: ACM Press, 2013: 127-136. [31] Kim J, Thomas P, Sankaranarayana R, et al.Pagination versus scrolling in mobile Web search[C]// Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM Press, 2016: 751-760. [32] Jones M, Buchanan G, Thimbleby H.Improving web search on small screen devices[J]. Interacting with Computers, 2003, 15(4): 479-495. [33] Granka L, Feusner M, Lorigo L.Eye monitoring in online search[M]// Hammoud R (eds). Passive Eye Monitoring, Signals and Communication Technology. Berlin: Springer, 2008: 347-372. [34] Schwartz B.The paradox of choice: why more is less[M]. Grand Haven: Harper Perennial, 2005. [35] Joachims T, Granka L, Pan B, et al. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2007, 25(2): Article No. 7. [36] Guan Z W, Cutrell E.An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on web search[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2007: 417-420. [37] Buscher G, Dumais S T, Cutrell E.The good, the bad, and the random: an eye-tracking study of ad quality in web search[C]// Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 42-49. [38] Rodden K, Fu X.Exploring how mouse movements relate to eye movements on Web search results pages[J]. SIGIR Workshop on Web Information Seeking & Interaction, 2007: 29-32. [39] Ostergren M, Yu S Y, Efthimiadis E N.The value of visual elements in web search[C]// Proceeding of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 867-868. [40] Kaisser M, Hearst M A, Lowe J B.Improving search results quality by customizing summary lengths[C]// Proceedings of ACL-08. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008: 701-709. [41] Metrikov P, Diaz F, Lahaie S, et al.Whole page optimization: how page elements interact with the position auction[C]// Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. New York: ACM Press, 2014: 583-600. [42] Capra R, Arguello J, Scholer F.Augmenting web search surrogates with images[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. New York: ACM Press, 2013: 399-408. [43] Cutrell E, Guan Z W.What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2007: 407-416. [44] Bota H.Nonlinear composite search results[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2016: 345-347. [45] Sushmita S, Joho H, Lalmas M, et al.Factors affecting click-through behavior in aggregated search interfaces[C]// Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 519-528. [46] Huang J, White R, Buscher G.User see, user point: gaze and cursor alignment in web search[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2012: 1341-1350. [47] Rodden K, Fu X, Aula A, et al.Eye-mouse coordination patterns on web search results pages[C]// Proceedings of the Conference on Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2008: 2997-3002. [48] Navalpakkam V, Churchill E.Mouse tracking: Measuring and predicting users’ experience of web-based content[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2012: 2963-2972. [49] Navalpakkam V, Jentzsch L D, Sayres R, et al.Measurement and modeling of eye-mouse behavior in the presence of nonlinear page layouts[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: ACM Press, 2013: 953-964. [50] Chen M C, Anderson J R, Sohn M H.What can a mouse cursor tell us more?: correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing[C]// Proceedings of the Conference on Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2001: 281-282. [51] Huang J, White R W, Dumais S.No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2011: 1225-1234. [52] Guo Q, Agichtein E.Towards predicting web searcher gaze position from mouse movements[C]// Proceedings of the Conference on Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 3601-3606. [53] Guo Q, Agichtein E.Exploring mouse movements for inferring query intent[C]// Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2008: 707-708. [54] Hotchkiss G, Alston S, Edwards G.Eye tracking study[R/OL]. Enquiro Search Solutions Inc.[2018-04-04]. https://searchengineland.com/figz/wp-content/seloads/2007/09/hotchkiss-eye-tracking-2005.pdf. [55] Nielsen J, Pernice K.Eyetracking web usability[M]. Thousand Oaks: New Riders Publishing, 2009. [56] Guo Q, Jin H J, Lagun D, et al.Towards estimating web search result relevance from touch interactions on mobile devices[C]// Proceedings of the Conference on Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2013: 1821-1826. [57] Guo Q, Jin H J, Lagun D, et al.Mining touch interaction data on mobile devices to predict web search result relevance[C]// Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2013: 153-162. [58] Buscher G, Cutrell E, Morris M R.What do you see when you’re surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages[C]// Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2009: 21-30. [59] Guo Q, Agichtein E.Ready to buy or just browsing?: detecting web searcher goals from interaction data[C]// Proceeding of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 130-137. [60] Diaz F, White R, Buscher G, et al.Robust models of mouse movement on dynamic web search results pages[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. New York: ACM Press, 2013: 1451-1460. [61] Lagun D, Agichtein E.Inferring searcher attention by jointly modeling user interactions and content salience[C]// Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 2015: 483-492.
