杰出青年科研人员学术职业生涯科研合作特征演变分析——以化学领域为例

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2021.07.008

情报学报

2021, Vol. 40

Issue (7): 756-767 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2021.07.008

情报分析方法与技术

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

杰出青年科研人员学术职业生涯科研合作特征演变分析——以化学领域为例

欧桂燕^1,2, 岳名亮³, 吴江^1,2, 马廷灿^3,4,5

1.武汉大学信息资源研究中心，武汉 430072
2.武汉大学信息管理学院，武汉 430072
3.中国科学院武汉文献情报中心，武汉 430071
4.中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系，北京 100190
5.科技大数据湖北省重点实验室，武汉 430071

An Analysis of the Evolution of Research Collaboration According to the Academic Careers of Distinguished Researchers in Chemistry

Ou Guiyan^1,2, Yue Mingliang³, Wu Jiang^1,2, Ma Tingcan^3,4,5

1.Center for Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072
2.School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072
3.Wuhan Documentation and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071
4.Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
5.Hubei Key Laboratory of Big Data in Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (7)

全文: PDF (1758 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要随着学科交叉广度与深度的增强，科研合作已成为科学研究的主要趋势，主要以合著论文的形式广泛存在。有效的科研合作有助于资金流动、增加科研产出，从而促进学术职业生涯的有效开展。本文以2001—2010年化学领域235名国家杰出青年科学基金获得者（简称“杰青”）为例，通过履历分析方法获取杰青基本信息与工作经历，基于SCI合著论文对比分析杰青获得者在其学术职业生涯阶段三个关键时间节点合作模式与合作角色的演变特征，以期为把握杰出科研人员的成长规律提供一定认识。研究结果发现，当站在更高的学术高度，拥有更多的科研资源与学术人脉时，杰青获得者与国内其他高校（机构）学者的合作也进一步加强；合作角色也随着学术经验、声望的提高产生明显的转化，从晋升正高职称前的执行者角色逐渐转化为以指导者身份为主导；在整个学术职业生涯中，杰青获得者科研合作贡献度逐渐提升，而后趋于平衡。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	欧桂燕
	岳名亮
	吴江
	马廷灿

关键词 ：科研合作, 杰青, 行政任职, 合作角色, 学术职业生涯

收稿日期: 2020-11-02

基金资助:2020年中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项“科技领域战略情报研究咨询体系建设”（E0290001）。

作者简介: 欧桂燕，女，1994年生，博士研究生，主要研究领域为科学计量与科技政策；岳名亮，男，1986年生，博士，副研究员，主要研究领域为科学计量与评价；吴江，男，1978年生，博士，教授，主要研究领域为社会网络计算、网络信息计量；马廷灿，男，1980年生，研究馆员，硕士生导师，主要研究领域为科学计量与评价，E-mail：matc@whlib.ac.c；

引用本文:

欧桂燕, 岳名亮, 吴江, 马廷灿. 杰出青年科研人员学术职业生涯科研合作特征演变分析——以化学领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(7): 756-767.
Ou Guiyan, Yue Mingliang, Wu Jiang, Ma Tingcan. An Analysis of the Evolution of Research Collaboration According to the Academic Careers of Distinguished Researchers in Chemistry. 情报学报, 2021, 40(7): 756-767.

链接本文:

http://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2021.07.008 或 http://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I7/756

1 Abt H A. The future of single-authored papers[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 73(3): 353-358.
2 AdamsJ, PendleburyD, PotterR, 等. 多作者署名与研究分析[J]. 科学观察, 2020, 15(4): 49-64.
3 Lee S, Bozeman B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2005, 35(5): 673-702.
4 Henriksen D. What factors are associated with increasing co-authorship in the social sciences? A case study of Danish economics and political science[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 114(3): 1395-1421.
5 Leahey E. From sole investigator to team scientist: trends in the practice and study of research collaboration[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2016, 42(1): 81-100.
6 Wijesinghe S N R, Mura P, Bouchon F. Tourism knowledge and neocolonialism - a systematic critical review of the literature[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2019, 22(11): 1263-1279.
7 Traoré N, Landry R. On the determinants of scientists' collaboration[J]. Science Communication, 1997, 19(2): 124-140.
8 Jeong S, Choi J Y, Kim J. The determinants of research collaboration modes: exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(3): 967-983.
9 Casey T, Mahroum S, Ducatel K, et al. The mobility of academic researchers. Academic careers & recruitment in ICT and biotechnology[OL]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/38288143_ The_Mobility_of_Academic_Researchers_Academic_Careers_ Recruitment_in_ICT_and_Biotechnology.
10 贺超城, 吴江, 魏子瑶, 等. 科研合作中机构间科研主导力及邻近性机理——以中国生物医学领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(2): 148-157.
11 Abramo G, D'Angelo C A, Murgia G. Gender differences in research collaboration[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(4): 811-822.
12 Zuckerman H. Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship[J]. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32(3): 391-403.
13 Abramo G, D'Angelo C A, Murgia G. Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(3): 2275-2294.
14 Chan H F, ?nder A S, Torgler B. Do Nobel laureates change their patterns of collaboration following prize reception?[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3): 2215-2235.
15 Liu X J, Yu M X, Chen D Z, et al. Tracking research performance before and after receiving the Cheung Kong Scholars award: a case study of recipients in 2005[J]. Research Evaluation, 2018, 27(4): 367-379.
16 Mishra V, Smyth R. Are more senior academics really more research productive than junior academics? Evidence from Australian law schools[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(2): 411-425.
17 马缨. 行政职务对我国科研人员论文发表的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(11): 1614-1622.
18 Macharzina K, Wolf J, Rohn A. Quantitative evaluation of German research output in business administration: 1992-2001[J]. MIR: Management International Review, 2004, 44(3): 335-359.
19 王曰芬, 杨雪, 余厚强, 等. 人工智能科研团队的合作模式及其对比研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(20): 14-22.
20 蒋倩雯. 基于社会网络分析的我国区域科研合作模式及其演化规律研究[D]. 蚌埠: 安徽财经大学, 2020.
21 Bozeman B, Gaughan M. How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers[J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(10): 1393-1402.
22 Benckendorff P, Zehrer A. Career and collaboration patterns in tourism research[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2016, 19(14): 1386-1404.
23 Wang W, Yu S, Bekele T M, et al. Scientific collaboration patterns vary with scholars' academic ages[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(1): 329-343.
24 Zhang B, Wang X H. Empirical study on influence of university-industry collaboration on research performance and moderating effect of social capital: evidence from engineering academics in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(1): 257-277.
25 Gazni A, Sugimoto C R, Didegah F. Mapping world scientific collaboration: authors, institutions, and countries[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(2): 323-335.
26 Finardi U, Buratti A. Scientific collaboration framework of BRICS countries: an analysis of international coauthorship[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(1): 433-446.
27 Zhao Y, Li D, Han M J, et al. Characteristics of research collaboration in biotechnology in China: evidence from publications indexed in the SCIE[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3): 1373-1387.
28 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 黄颖. 跨学科合作模式下的交叉科学测度研究——以ESI社会科学领域高被引学者为例[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(3): 231-242.
29 Riesenberg D, Lundberg G D. The order of authorship: who's on first?[J]. JAMA, 1990, 264(14): 1857-1857.
30 Yank V, Rennie D. Disclosure of researcher contributions: a study of original research articles in The Lancet[J]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1999, 130(8): 661-670.
31 Wren J D, Kozak K Z, Johnson K R, et al. The write position[J]. EMBO Reports, 2007, 8(11): 988-991.
32 Drenth J P H. Multiple authorship: the contribution of senior authors[J]. JAMA, 1998, 280(3): 219-221.
33 Mattsson P, Sundberg C J, Laget P. Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(1): 99-105.
34 Larivière V, Desrochers N, Macaluso B, et al. Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2016, 46(3): 417-435.
35 左菊. 科研合著中署名顺序与作者贡献研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2014.
36 What is a corresponding author?[EB/OL]. [2021-01-23]. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/publication-recognition/what-corresponding-author/.
37 汪士. 杰出科学家行政任职研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2012.
38 徐飞, 汪士. 杰出科学家行政任职对科研创新的影响——以诺贝尔奖获得者与中国科学院院士比较为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(7): 981-985.
39 Lou W, Zhao Y H, Chen Y C, et al. Research or management? An investigation of the impact of leadership roles on the research performance of academic administrators[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(1): 191-209.
40 Beaver D. Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 52(3): 365-377.
41 Bozeman B, Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(4): 599-616.
42 Díaz-Faes A A, Costas R, Galindo M P, et al. Unravelling the performance of individual scholars: use of canonical Biplot analysis to explore the performance of scientists by academic rank and scientific field[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(4): 722-733.
43 Hemlin S, Gustafsson M. Research production in the arts and humanities: a questionnaire study of factors influencing research performance[J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 37(3): 417-432.
44 Martin B R, Skea J E F. Academic research performance indicators: an assessment of the possibilities[M]. University of Sussex, 1992.
45 Tscharntke T, Hochberg M E, Rand T A, et al. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications[J]. PLoS Biology, 2007, 5(1): e18.