|
|
|
| The Evolution Law of International Technology Trade Pattern: The Perspective of Data Analysis of Charges for the Use of Intellectual Property |
| Feng Zhigang1,2, Zhang Zhiqiang1,2, Liu Hao1 |
1.Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041
2.Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract From a global perspective, this study explores the evolution of the pattern of international technology trade activities over a significant period. This study selects the data of charges for the use of intellectual property of 50 major countries (regions) from 1970 to 2019 as the analysis object. Subsequently, it uses the gravity center model, science center transfer theory, and complex network analysis method to analyze the geographical gravity center transfer, center country (regions) transfer order, and network structure evolution of international technology trade from import and export perspectives. From 1970 to 2019: (1) The import and export geographical gravity centers of international technology trade were stable in the northern hemisphere, and moved eastward at the speed of 0.56 degrees (45.19 km) per year and 1.52 degrees (120.68 km) per year; the import gravity center was consistently located to the east of the export gravity center, but the distance between them was gradually narrowing. (2) The transfer order of the import center of international technology trade is Germany → Japan → the United States → the Netherlands → Ireland; the export center has not been transferred, and it has always been the United States, but its proportion continues to decline. (3) International technology trade activities are becoming increasingly extensive and deepening; the international technology trade network has obvious “small world” and “core-edge” structural characteristics; the dominant position of the United States is still obvious, with the strongest technology trade profitability; China’s network status has rapidly improved, but the export capacity of technology trade needs to be improved.
|
|
Received: 23 November 2020
|
|
|
|
1 李虹. 国际技术贸易[M]. 3版. 大连: 东北财经大学出版社, 2013: 4.
2 余涛, 翁凌崚. 国际技术贸易发展趋势及我国的对策选择[J]. 经济师, 2008(11): 55-56.
3 Posner M V. International trade and technical change[J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 1961, 13(3): 323-341.
4 黄繁华. 国际技术贸易: 发展新趋势及其启示[J]. 国际经济合作, 1997(11): 15-18.
5 方希桦, 包群, 赖明勇. 国际技术溢出: 基于进口传导机制的实证研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2004(7): 58-64.
6 Keller W. Do trade patterns and technology flows affect productivity growth?[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, 2000, 14(1): 17-47.
7 许佳琪. 全球技术贸易网络的时空演化及其影响机制[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2020: 164.
8 World Trade Organization. Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (unamended)[EB/OL]. (1994-04-15) [2020-10-10]. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_ 01_e.htm.
9 Manual on statistics of international trade in services 2010 (MSITS2010)[OL]. (2010-02-22) [2020-10-10]. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/tradeserv/TFSITS/MSITS/MSITS2010%20%20for%20the%20SC%202010%20at%202.22.2010.pdf.
10 段德忠, 谌颖, 杜德斌. “一带一路”技术贸易格局演化研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(7): 998-1008.
11 禹华英. 国际技术贸易中的限制性商业条款[J]. 现代法学, 1998(4): 3-5.
12 沈鸿. 国际技术贸易中的限制性条款及其法律管制[J]. 广东商学院学报, 2005(5): 84-89.
13 朱梦男. 对国际技术贸易中限制性商业做法的法律规制[J]. 法制博览, 2017(26): 267.
14 姜鸿. 国际技术贸易合同条款的风险及其防范[J]. 江汉大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2002, 21(5): 61-65.
15 傅元红. 中小企业国际技术贸易的合同问题及非讼对策[J]. 法制博览, 2019(7): 105-106.
16 古祖雪. 论国际技术贸易中的知识产权限制[J]. 当代法学, 2005, 19(2): 21-26.
17 郑维炜, 全小莲. 国际技术贸易中知识产权保护的前提性困境与出路[J]. 求索, 2009(3): 120-122.
18 许传奇. 经济全球背景下国际技术贸易中的知识产权保护问题研究[J]. 科技资讯, 2019, 17(11): 176-177.
19 吕晓青. 中国知识产权保护与国际技术贸易研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2007: 46.
20 周桂荣, 杨亚军. 浅谈我国国际技术贸易中的知识产权侵权问题[J]. 时代金融, 2017(12): 14, 17.
21 陈继元. 国际技术贸易发展趋势及我国的应对措施[J]. 武汉市经济管理干部学院学报, 2003, 17(3): 25-27.
22 赵永宁. 中国国际技术贸易的问题及对策研究[J]. 云南财贸学院学报, 2003, 19(5): 18-21.
23 张仁开. 当代国际技术贸易发展的新态势与新格局[J]. 对外经贸实务, 2004(10): 38-41.
24 芮宝娟, 许继琴. 国际技术贸易的特点与趋势分析[J]. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 2004, 17(1): 23-25, 45.
25 华鹰. 我国在国际技术贸易中的知识产权策略[J]. 电子知识产权, 2006(11): 33-36.
26 罗晖, 付震宇, 王寅秋. 发展融合、创新、联动的国际技术贸易[J]. 今日科苑, 2019(9): 73-83.
27 The Word Bank. World development indicators[EB/OL]. (2020-07-25) [2020-09-27]. https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx? source=2&series=NY.GDP.MKTP.CD&country.
28 OECD. EBOPS 2002 - Balanced international trade in services (1995-2012)[EB/OL]. (2020-06-29) [2020-09-24]. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=BATIS_EBOPS2002.
29 OECD. EBOPS 2010 - Trade in services by partner economy[EB/OL]. (2020-06-29) [2020-09-24]. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TISP_EBOPS2010.
30 WTO. Commercial services imports/exports by sector-annual (1980-2013) (Million US dollar)[EB/OL]. (2020-09-21) [2020-09-24]. https://data.wto.org/.
31 WTO. Commercial services imports/exports by sector and partner-annual (2005-2019) (Million US dollar)[EB/OL]. (2020-09-21) [2020-09-24]. https://data.wto.org/.
32 Services (BPM6): exports and imports by service-category and by trade-partner, annual[EB/OL]. (2020-08-06) [2020-09-27]. https://cn.knoema.com/UNCTADBPM62021/services-bpm6-exports-and-imports-by-service-category-and-by-trade-partner-annual.
33 UN Comtrade Database. Trade statistics[EB/OL]. (2020-06-11) [2020-09-27]. https://comtrade.un.org/data/.
34 OECD. The OECD-WTO balanced trade in services database[EB/OL]. (2020-06-30) [2020-09-24]. https://stats.oecd.org/.
35 郑渊. 中国知识产权贸易国际竞争力比较研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2020: 1.
36 丁焕峰, 李佩仪. 建国以来广东省人口重心与就业重心演变轨迹分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2009, 28(4): 79-84.
37 Bernal J D. Science in history[M]. London: The MIT Press, 1954: 930-931.
38 Yuasa M. Center of scientific activity: its shift from the 16th to the 20th century[J]. Japanese Studies in the History of Science, 1962, 1(1): 57-75.
39 赵克. 科学中心转移与中国战略机遇[J]. 毛泽东邓小平理论研究, 2013(7): 72-77, 93.
40 陈文化. 科学技术与发展计量研究[M]. 长沙: 中南工业大学出版社, 1992: 235.
41 姜国钧. 论教育中心转移与科技中心转移的关系[J]. 科学技术与辩证法, 1999, 16(1): 43-46, 54.
42 刘则渊, 王海山. 近代世界哲学高潮和科学中心关系的历史考察[J]. 科研管理, 1981, 2(1): 9-23.
43 黄欣荣, 王英. 古代技术活动中心兴衰规律的统计研究[J]. 科学技术与辩证法, 1990, 7(3): 23-27.
44 黄欣荣, 王英. 技术活动中心规律的统计研究[J]. 科学技术与辩证法, 1989, 6(6): 55-57.
45 彭福扬, 王树仁. 论技术活动中心转移[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 1997, 11(1): 30-32.
46 梁立明, 陈立新. 世界技术成果时空分布的量化特征及世界技术中心的转移[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2005, 21(2): 67-73.
47 Cornell University, INSEAD, the World Intellectual Property Organization. Global innovation index 2020: who will finance innovation?[M/OL]. (2020-09-02) [2020-10-08]. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf.
48 李平. 国际技术扩散的路径和方式[J]. 世界经济, 2006, 29(9): 85-93.
49 张志强, 陈云伟. 建设适应经济社会发展趋势的科技创新体系[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(5): 534-544.
50 张志强. 世界百年未有之大变局与智库使命和智库建设[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2020, 5(4): 1-12.
51 The Chinese century is well under way[EB/OL]. Economist, (2018-10-27) [2020-10-08]. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/10/27/the-chinese-century-is-well-under-way.
52 周启元. 西德的技术引进及其特点[J]. 经济学动态, 1980(5): 63-65.
53 张雄辉. 日本技术引进的经验及对中国的启示[J]. 现代商业, 2011(8): 100-101.
54 张雄辉. 美国和韩国技术引进特点的比较及启示[J]. 长春理工大学学报, 2011, 6(8): 62-63.
55 赵国庆. 审视跨国高科技公司避税行为 完善我国反避税制度——兼评“双爱尔兰(荷兰三明治)”避税安排[J]. 国际税收, 2013(8): 44-49.
56 王智博, 盛小平, 杨洋. 基于核心—边缘结构的开放存取期刊评价分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(3): 82-85, 70.
57 冯志刚, 张志强, 刘自强. 国际跨国专利所有网络结构及演化规律研究[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(7): 153-161.
58 Valverde S, Cancho R F, Solé R V. Scale-free networks from optimal design[J]. Europhysics Letters, 2002, 60(4): 512-517.
59 伊曼纽尔?沃勒斯坦. 现代世界体系(第一卷)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1998: 13-14.
60 乔翠霞. 提高技术引进效率实现我国技术跨越式发展——后起国家技术发展的经验及启示[J]. 科学经济社会, 2008, 26(2): 45-49.
61 柏振忠. 我国技术引进效率存在的问题探析——从国际经验的角度[J]. 理论月刊, 2007(8): 71-73.
62 林虹. 我国技术引进的发展、问题与对策——兼论日本技术引进的经验与借鉴[D]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2011: 28.
63 张景安. 实现由技术引进为主向自主创新为主转变的战略思考[J]. 中国软科学, 2003(11): 1-5. |
|
|
|
