|
|
|
| Based on ISWC: A Review of the Situations and Trends of the Semantic Web |
| Xu Xin, Yang Jiaying |
| Department of Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The “semantic web” refers to a concept related to machine-accessible data proposed by Tim Berners-Lee in 1998. As the semantic web completes its twentieth year, a systematic review of its history and trends is urgently required. To cover the gap in global review studies of the semantic web, this study focuses on the resources, techniques, and practices utilized in relation to the semantic web based on the articles of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), which is the most authoritative conference on the semantic web in the world. The literature study method is applied in this paper to review ISWC conference papers from 2002 to 2018. Specifically, semantic web resources such as datasets, ontologies, workflows, evaluation benchmarks, and so on are reviewed. The semantic web techniques section deals with data inquiry, data process, data storage, data access, and applications followed by three practical cases in the actual business world. The results of the review indicate that ISWC researchers build a resource world having variety and openness; however, profit-oriented enterprises are not encouraged in the process of resource construction. Moreover, techniques builders have gradually shifted their attention from semantics comprehension to linked data construction.
|
|
Received: 18 June 2019
|
|
|
|
1 Berners-Lee T. Semantic Web road map[EB/OL]. (1998-10-14). https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.htmlhttps://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html.
2 Antoniou G, van Harmelen F. A semantic web primer[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012: 15-16.
3 Gruber T R. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications[J]. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 5(2): 199-220.
4 McGuinness D L, van Harmelen F. OWL Web Ontology Language overview[EB/OL]. (2004-02-10) [2019-08-25]. https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/.
5 Berners-Lee T. Linked data[EB/OL]. (2006-07-27) [2017-12-31]. https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
6 Lapkin A. Hype cycle for big data, 2012[EB/OL]. (2012-07-31) [2017-12-31]. https://www.gartner.com/doc/2100215/hype-cycle-big-data-.
7 Bray T, Sperberg-McQueen C M. Extensible Markup Language (XML)[EB/OL]. (1996-11-14) [2019-08-25]. https://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-961114.html.
8 Resource description framework (RDF)[EB/OL]. (1997-12-11) [2019-08-25]. https://web.archive.org/web/19980214043631/http://www13.w3.org/RDF/Overview.html.
9 Pease A. Why use DAML?[EB/OL]. (2002-04-10) [2019-8-25]. http://www.daml.org/2002/04/why.html.
10 Hitzler P, Kr?tzsch M, Parsia B, et al. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language primer (second edition)[EB/OL]. (2012-12-11) [2019-8-25]. https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-primer-20121211/.
11 Adida B, Birbeck M, McCarron S, et al. RDFa Core 1.1 - third edition[EB/OL]. (2015-03-17) [2019-8-25]. https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-rdfa-core-20150317/.
12 Machado R S, Almeida R B, Pernas A M, et al. State of the art in hybrid strategies for context reasoning: A systematic literature review[J]. Information and Software Technology, 2019, 111: 122-130.
13 尚新丽. 国外本体构建方法比较分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(4): 116-119.
14 Simperl E, Luczak-R?sch M. Collaborative ontology engineering: A survey[J]. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2014, 29(1): 101-131.
15 Otero-Cerdeira L, Rodríguez-Martínez F J, Gómez-Rodríguez A. Ontology matching: A literature review[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(2): 949-971.
16 Brank J, Grobelnik M, Mladenic D. A survey of ontology evaluation techniques[C]// Proceedings of the Conference on Data Mining and Data Warehouses, Citeseer Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2005: 166-170.
17 王林彬, 黎建辉, 沈志宏. 基于NoSQL的RDF数据存储与查询技术综述[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2015, 32(5): 1281-1286.
18 Abele A, McCrae J. The linking open data cloud diagram[EB/OL]. (2017-08-22) [2017-12-31]. http://lod-cloud.net/.
19 Abanda H, Ng’Ombe A, Tah J H M, et al. An ontology-driven decision support system for land delivery in Zambia[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(9): 10896-10905.
20 Zou P X W, Seo Y. Effective applications of e-commerce technologies in construction supply chain: current practice and future improvement[J]. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 2006, 11(10): 127-147.
21 Xu Z, Fu Y, Mao J, et al. Towards the semantic web: Collaborative tag suggestions[C]// Proceedings of Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006.
22 Ding L, Finin T, Joshi A, et al. Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web[C]// Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM Press, 2004: 652-659.
23 McIlraith S A, Son T C, Zeng H L. Semantic Web services[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2001, 16(2): 46-53.
24 刘柏嵩. 基于知识的语义网: 概念、技术及挑战[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2003, 29(2): 18-21.
25 刘炜. 关联数据: 概念、技术及应用展望[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2011, 29(2): 5-12.
26 张智雄. Metadata: 组织和发现Internet信息资源的数据[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 1999, 15(S1): 21-25.
27 栾艳, 丁二玉, 骆斌. 基于Ontology的语义检索技术[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2005, 41(28): 156-159.
28 王新. 分布式谓词库语义网构建方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(2): 23-27.
29 夏翠娟. 面向语义网的书目框架(BIBFRAME): 功能需求及实现[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014, 32(6): 61-69.
30 王晓光, 徐雷, 李纲. 敦煌壁画数字图像语义描述方法研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(1): 50-59.
31 夏翠娟. 中国历史地理数据在图书馆数字人文项目中的开放应用研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(2): 40-53.
32 上海图书馆. 上海图书馆开放数据平台[EB/OL]. [2017-12-31]. http://data.library.sh.cn/.
33 复旦大学. Knowledge works[EB/OL]. [2017-12-31]. http://kw.fudan.edu.cn/.
34 OpenKG.CN[EB/OL]. [2017-12-31]. http://openkg.cn/.
35 众源数据[EB/OL]. [2017-12-31]. http://www.usources.cn/index.html.
36 SWSA. International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC)[EB/OL]. [2017-12-31]. http://swsa.semanticweb.org/content/international-semantic-web-conference-iswc.
37 中国计算机学会. 中国计算机学会推荐国际学术期刊(数据库/数据挖掘/内容检索)[EB/OL]. [2017-12-31]. https://www.ccf.org.cn/xspj/sjk/sjwj/nrjs/.
38 Peroni S, Shotton D. The SPAR ontologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2018: 119-136.
39 Calbimonte J P, Dubosson F, Hilfiker R, et al. The MedRed ontology for representing clinical data acquisition metadata[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 38-47.
40 Kamdar M R, Walk S, Tudorache T, et al. BiOnIC: A catalog of user interactions with biomedical ontologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 130-138.
41 Daniele L, Solanki M, den Hartog F, et al. Interoperability for smart appliances in the IoT world[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 21-29.
42 Allik A, Fazekas G, Sandler M. Ontological representation of audio features[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 3-11.
43 Du H S, Dimitrova V, Magee D, et al. An ontology of soil properties and processes[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 30-37.
44 Rebele T, Suchanek F, Hoffart J, et al. YAGO: A multilingual knowledge base from Wikipedia, WordNet, and GeoNames[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 177-185.
45 Nuzzolese A G, Gentile A L, Presutti V, et al. Conference linked data: The scholarly data project[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 150-158.
46 Hertling S, Paulheim H. WebIsALOD: Providing hypernymy relations extracted from the web as linked open data[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 111-119.
47 Nechaev Y, Corcoglioniti F, Giuliano C. SocialLink: Linking DBpedia entities to corresponding Twitter accounts[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 165-174.
48 Ferrada S, Bustos B, Hogan A. IMGpedia: A linked dataset with content-based analysis of Wikimedia images[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 84-93.
49 Herrera J E T, Casanova M A, Nunes B P, et al. An entity relatedness test dataset[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 193-201.
50 Bechhofer S, Page K, Weigl D M, et al. Linked data publication of live music archives and analyses[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 29-37.
51 Mero?o-Pe?uela A, Hoekstra R, Gangemi A, et al. The MIDI linked data cloud[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 156-164.
52 Peroni S, Shotton D, Vitali F. One year of the OpenCitations Corpus[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 184-192.
53 Hu W, Li H X, Sun Z Q, et al. Clinga: Bringing Chinese physical and human geography in linked open data[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Springer International Publishing, 2016: 104-112.
54 Debruyne C, Meehan A, Clinton é, et al. Ireland’s authoritative geospatial linked data[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 66-74.
55 Fang Z J, Wang H F, Gracia J, et al. Zhishi.lemon: On publishing Zhishi.me as linguistic linked open data[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham Springer, 2016: 47-55.
56 Atzeni M, Atzori M. CodeOntology: RDF-ization of source code[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 20-28.
57 Burns G A, Hermjakob U, Ambite J L. Abstract meaning representations as linked data[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 12-20.
58 Faralli S, Panchenko A, Biemann C, et al. Linked disambiguated distributional semantic networks[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 56-64.
59 Lehmann J, Sejdiu G, Bühmann L, et al. Distributed semantic analytics using the SANSA stack[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 147-155.
60 Garijo D. WIDOCO: A wizard for documenting ontologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 94-102.
61 Mauri A, Calbimonte J P, Dell’Aglio D, et al. TripleWave: Spreading RDF streams on the Web[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 140-149.
62 Wilmering T, Fazekas G, Sandler M B. AUFX-O: Novel methods for the representation of audio processing workflows[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 229-237.
63 Gon?alves R S, O’Connor M J, Martínez-Romero M, et al. The CEDAR workbench: An ontology-assisted environment for authoring metadata that describe scientific experiments[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 103-110.
64 Ermilov I, Lehmann J, Martin M, et al. LODStats: The data web census dataset[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 38-46.
65 An Y, Borgida A, Mylopoulos J. Constructing complex semantic mappings between XML data and ontologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 6-20.
66 Missikoff M, Navigli R, Velardi P. The usable ontology: An environment for building and assessing a domain ontology[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2002: 39-53.
67 Mukherjee S, Yang G Z, Ramakrishnan I V. Automatic annotation of content-rich HTML documents: Structural and semantic analysis[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 533-549.
68 Denker G, Kagal L, Finin T, et al. Security for DAML web services: Annotation and matchmaking[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 335-350.
69 He? A, Johnston E, Kushmerick N. ASSAM: A tool for semi-automatically annotating semantic web services[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2004: 320-334.
70 Tang J, Hong M, Li J, et al. Tree-structured conditional random fields for semantic annotation[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 640-653.
71 Bechhofer S, Harper S, Lunn D. SADIe: Semantic annotation for accessibility[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 101-115.
72 Belhajjame K, Embury S M, Paton N W, et al. Automatic annotation of web services based on workflow definitions[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 116-129.
73 Amann B, Beeri C, Fundulaki I, et al. Ontology-based integration of XML web resources[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2002: 117-131.
74 Troncy R. Integrating structure and semantics into audio-visual documents[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 566-581.
75 Constantinescu I, Binder W, Faltings B. An extensible directory enabling efficient semantic web service integration[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2004: 605-619.
76 Wang S H, Pan J Z. Integrating and querying parallel leaf shape descriptions[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 668-681.
77 Kiryakov A, Popov B, Ognyanoff D, et al. Semantic annotation, indexing, and retrieval[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 484-499.
78 Kesselman C. The Grid, Grid Services and the semantic web: Technologies and opportunities[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2002: 3-4.
79 Eberhart A. Automatic generation of Java/SQL based inference engines from RDF Schema and RuleML[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2002: 102-116.
80 Broekstra J, Kampman A, van Harmelen F. Sesame: A generic architecture for storing and querying RDF and RDF Schema[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2002: 54-68.
81 Carroll J J. Signing RDF graphs[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 369-384.
82 Horrocks I, Tessaris S. Querying the semantic web: A formal approach[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2002: 177-191.
83 Esposito F, Fanizzi N, Iannone L, et al. Knowledge-intensive induction of terminologies from metadata[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2004: 441-455.
84 Hitzler P, Vrande?i? D. Resolution-based approximate reasoning for OWL DL[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 383-397.
85 Bouquet P, Giunchiglia F, van Harmelen F, et al. C-OWL: Contextualizing ontologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 164-179.
86 Huang Z S, Stuckenschmidt H. Reasoning with multi-version ontologies: A temporal logic approach[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 398-412.
87 Haase P, Broekstra J, Eberhart A, et al. A comparison of RDF query languages[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2004: 502-517.
88 Miklós Z, Neumann G, Zdun U, et al. Querying semantic web resources using triple views[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 517-532.
89 Serfiotis G, Koffina I, Christophides V, et al. Containment and minimization of RDF/S query patterns[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 607-623.
90 Siberski W, Pan J Z, Thaden U. Querying the semantic web with preferences[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 612-624.
91 Hiramatsu K, Akahani J, Satoh T. Querying real world services through the semantic web[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2004: 741-751.
92 M?kel? E, Hyv?nen E, Saarela S. Ontogator—A semantic view-based search engine service for web applications[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 847-860.
93 Corcho O, Gómez-Pérez A, López-Cima A, et al. ODESeW: Automatic generation of knowledge portals for intranets and extranets[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 802-817.
94 Price D, Bodington R. Applying semantic web technology to the life cycle support of complex engineering assets[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2004: 812-822.
95 Schnurr H P, Angele J. Do not use this gear with a switching lever! Automotive industry experience with semantic guides[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 1029-1040.
96 Keller R M, Berrios D C, Carvalho R E, et al. SemanticOrganizer: A customizable semantic repository for distributed NASA project teams[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2004: 767-781.
97 Kraines S, Guo W S, Kemper B, et al. EKOSS: A knowledge-user centered approach to knowledge sharing, discovery, and integration on the semantic web[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 833-846.
98 Garg S, Goswami A, Huylebroeck J, et al. MediaCaddy – Semantic web based on-demand content navigation system for entertainment[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 858-871.
99 Kawamura T, Ueno K, Nagano S, et al. Ubiquitous service finder discovery of services semantically derived from metadata in ubiquitous computing[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 902-915.
100 Khushraj D, Lassila O. Ontological approach to generating personalized user interfaces for web services[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005: 916-927.
101 Gustafsson M, Falkman G, Lindahl F, et al. Enabling an online community for sharing oral medicine cases using semantic web technologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 820-832.
102 B?hm C, Groth P, Leser U. Graph-based ontology construction from heterogenous evidences[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 81-96.
103 Blomqvist E. OntoCase-automatic ontology enrichment based on ontology design patterns[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 65-80.
104 B?hm C, Groth P, Leser U. Graph-based ontology construction from heterogenous evidences[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 81-96.
105 Zhu M. DC proposal: Ontology learning from noisy linked data[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 373-380.
106 Zhou M W, Bao S H, Wu X, et al. An unsupervised model for exploring hierarchical semantics from social annotations[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 680-693.
107 Dědek J. Towards semantic annotation supported by dependency linguistics and ILP[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 297-304.
108 Happel H J. Semantic need: guiding metadata annotations by questions people #ask[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 321-336.
109 Paulheim H. Ontologies for user interface integration[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 973-981.
110 Puleston C, Parsia B, Cunningham J, et al. Integrating object-oriented and ontological representations: A case study in Java and OWL[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 130-145.
111 Predoiu L. Probabilistic information integration and retrieval in the Semantic Web[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 936-940.
112 Schmidt M, Hornung T, Küchlin N, et al. An experimental comparison of RDF data management approaches in a SPARQL benchmark scenario[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 82-97.
113 Abel F, de Coi J L, Henze N, et al. Enabling advanced and context-dependent access control in RDF stores[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 1-14.
114 Baader F, Knechtel M, Pe?aloza R. A generic approach for large-scale ontological reasoning in the presence of access restrictions to the ontology s axioms[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 49-64.
115 Du J F, Qi G L, Pan J Z, et al. A decomposition-based approach to optimizing conjunctive query answering in OWL DL[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 146-162.
116 Kaoudi Z, Miliaraki I, Koubarakis M. RDFS reasoning and query answering on top of DHTs[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 499-516.
117 de Bruijn J, Heymans S. Logical foundations of (e)RDF(S): Complexity and reasoning[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference/Asian Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 86-99.
118 Cuenca Grau B, Halaschek-Wiener C, Kazakov Y. History matters: Incremental ontology reasoning using modules[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference/Asian Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 183-196.
119 Stoilos G, Cuenca Grau B, Motik B, et al. Repairing ontologies for incomplete reasoners[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 681-696.
120 Stoilos G, Cuenca Grau B, Horrocks I. Completeness guarantees for incomplete reasoners[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 747-763.
121 Liarou E, Idreos S, Koubarakis M. Continuous RDF query processing over DHTs[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 324-339.
122 Ladwig G, Tran T. Linked data query processing strategies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 453-469.
123 Wielemaker J, Hildebrand M, van Ossenbruggen J, et al. Thesaurus-based search in large heterogeneous collections[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 695-708.
124 Hyv?nen E, Viljanen K, Suominen O. HealthFinland—Finnish health information on the semantic web[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 778-791.
125 Bicer V, Tran T, Abecker A, et al. KOIOS: Utilizing semantic search for easy-access and visualization of structured environmental data[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 1-16.
126 Isaac A, Kramer D, van der Meij L, et al. Vocabulary matching for book indexing suggestion in linked libraries – A prototype implementation and evaluation[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 843-859.
127 Alani H, Szomszor M, Cattuto C, et al. Live social semantics[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 698-714.
128 Hauer T, Rogulin D, Zillner S, et al. An architecture for semantic navigation and reasoning with patient data-experiences of the Health-e-Child Project[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 737-750.
129 Sheth A, Agrawal S, Lathem J, et al. Active semantic electronic medical records[M]// The Semantic Web. Boston: Springer, 2007: 123-140.
130 Patel C, Cimino J, Dolby J, et al. Matching patient records to clinical trials using ontologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference/Asian Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 816-829.
131 Auer S, Dietzold S, Riechert T. OntoWiki – A tool for social, semantic collaboration[C]// Proceedings of the Workshop on Social & Collaborative Construction of Structured Knowledge. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006: 736-749.
132 Auer S, Bizer C, Kobilarov G, et al. DBpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference/Asian Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 722-735.
133 Bhagdev R, Chakravarthy A, Chapman S, et al. Creating and using organisational semantic webs in large networked organisations[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 723-736.
134 Alani H, Dupplaw D, Sheridan J, et al. Unlocking the potential of public sector information with semantic web technology[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference/Asian Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 708-721.
135 Haglich P, Grimshaw R, Wilder S, et al. Cyber scientific test language[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 97-111.
136 Ma L, Sun X Z, Cao F, et al. Semantic enhancement for enterprise data management[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 876-892.
137 Verma K, Kass A. Requirements analysis tool: A tool for automatically analyzing software requirements documents[C]// Proceedings of the International Conference on the Semantic Web. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 751-763.
138 Saggion H, Funk A, Maynard D, et al. Ontology-based information extraction for business intelligence[C]// Proceedings of the International the Semantic Web Conference/Asian Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 843-856.
139 Sazonau V, Sattler U, Brown G. General terminology induction in OWL[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2015: 533-550.
140 Walk S, Singer P, Noboa L E, et al. Understanding how users edit ontologies: Comparing hypotheses about four real-world projects[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2015: 551-568.
141 Calvanese D, Giese M, Hovland D, et al. Ontology-based integration of cross-linked datasets[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2015: 199-216.
142 Hinze A, Heese R, Luczak-R?sch M, et al. Semantic enrichment by non-experts: Usability of manual annotation tools[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2012: 165-181.
143 Tian A, Sequeda J F, Miranker D P. QODI: Query as context in automatic data integration[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 624-639.
144 Hu W, Jia C X, Wan L, et al. CAMO: Integration of linked open data for multimedia metadata enrichment[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2014: 1-16.
145 Ahmeti A, Calvanese D, Polleres A. Updating RDFS ABoxes and TBoxes in SPARQL[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2014: 441-456.
146 de Giacomo G, Levesque H. Adding DL-Lite TBoxes to proper knowledge bases[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2015: 305-321.
147 Cuenca Grau B, Kharlamov E, Kostylev E V, et al. Controlled query evaluation over OWL 2 RL ontologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 49-65.
148 Kollia I, Glimm B. Cost based query ordering over OWL ontologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2012: 231-246.
149 Kostylev E V, Reutter J L, Romero M, et al. SPARQL with property paths[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2015: 3-18.
150 Kontchakov R, Rezk M, Rodríguez-Muro M, et al. Answering SPARQL queries over databases under OWL 2 QL entailment regime[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2014: 552-567.
151 Bischof S, Kr?tzsch M, Polleres A,et al. Schema-agnostic query rewriting in SPARQL 1.1[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2014: 584-600.
152 Lehmann J, Furche T, Grasso G, et al. DEQA: Deep web extraction for question answering[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2012: 131-147.
153 Welty C, Murdock J W, Kalyanpur A, et al. A comparison of hard filters and soft evidence for answer typing in watson[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2012: 243-256.
154 Gómez-Pérez J M, García-Cuesta E, Garrido A, et al. When history matters - Assessing reliability for the reuse of scientific workflows[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 81-97.
155 Blanco R, Cambazoglu B B, Mika P, et al. Entity recommendations in web search[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 33-48.
156 Chaussecourte P, Glimm B, Horrocks I, et al. The energy management adviser at EDF[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 49-64.
157 Sazonau V, Sattler U. Mining hypotheses from data in OWL: Advanced evaluation and complete construction[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 577-593.
158 Gad-Elrab M H, Stepanova D, Urbani J, et al. Exception-enriched rule learning from knowledge graphs[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 234-251.
159 Rospocher M. An ontology-driven probabilistic soft logic approach to improve NLP entity annotations[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2018: 144-161.
160 Stoilos G, Geleta D, Shamdasani J, et al. A novel approach and practical algorithms for ontology integration[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2018: 458-476.
161 Pham M D, Boncz P. Exploiting emergent schemas to make RDF systems more efficient[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 463-479.
162 Alaya N, Lamolle M, Ben Yahia S. Multi-label based learning for better multi-criteria ranking of ontology reasoners[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 3-19.
163 Carral D, Feier C, Hitzler P. A practical acyclicity notion for query answering over Horn-SRIQ ontologies[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 70-85.
164 Bourgaux C, Turhan A Y. Temporal query answering in DL-lite over inconsistent data[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 121-137.
165 Lopez V, Tommasi P, Kotoulas S, et al. QuerioDALI: Question answering over dynamic and linked knowledge graphs[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 363-382.
166 Thanapalasingam T, Osborne F, Birukou A, et al. Ontology-based recommendation of editorial products[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2018: 341-358.
167 Kejriwal M, Szekely P. An investigative search engine for the human trafficking domain[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2017: 247-262.
168 Ruan T, Xue L J, Wang H F, et al. Building and exploring an enterprise knowledge graph for investment analysis[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 418-436.
169 Osborne F, Salatino A, Birukou A, et al. Automatic classification of Springer Nature proceedings with smart topic miner[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 383-399.
170 Oldman D, Tanase D. Reshaping the knowledge graph by connecting researchers, data and practices in ResearchSpace[C]// Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. Cham: Springer, 2018: 325-340. |
|
|
|
