|
|
|
| Analysis of the Characteristic Factors and the Evolution of the High Altmetrics Score Papers in 2013-2018 |
| Ou Guiyan1,2, Ma Tingcan1,2, Li Ruinan1,2, He Xueyao1,2, Yue Mingliang1 |
1.Wuhan Documentation and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071
2.Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a measure of new influence, the advent of Altmetrics has led to extensive discussions in the field of scientific evaluation. Studying the characteristic factors and the evolution of high Altmetrics score papers can be a reference for the rational use of Altmetrics indicators, and the development and improvement of Altmetrics measurement methods. Therefore, this paper selects the Altmetric Top 100 papers as a research sample and compares the time distribution of the high Altmetrics score papers in 2013—2018, the distribution of journals, the distribution of research fields, and the evolution of multi-source index contributions. The results show that the network attention of high Altmetrics score papers has increased substantially every year; it has been published in ten high-impact journals such as Nature, Science and PNAS, and distributed in eight research areas including medical health science and biological science. Among the multiple Altmetrics metrics, News, Blogs, and Twitter show significant advantages.
|
|
Received: 22 May 2019
|
|
|
|
1 American Society for Cell Biology. San Francisco declaration on research assessment[EB/OL]. [2019-05-15]. https://sfdora.org/read/.
2 HicksD, WoutersP. 关于科研指标的莱顿宣言[EB/OL]. [2019-05-15]. http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/uploads/4/1/6/0/41603901/leiden_manifesto_chinese_150423.pdf.
3 Altmetric. What are Altmetrics?[EB/OL]. [2019-05-15]. https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/ Photo#pretty.
4 PriemJ, TaraborelliD, GrothP, et al. Altmetrics: A manifesto[EB/OL]. [2019-05-15]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
5 邱均平, 余厚强. 论推动替代计量学发展的若干基本问题[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(1): 4-15.
6 由庆斌, 汤珊红. 补充计量学及应用前景[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(12): 6-10.
7 刘春丽. Web 2.0环境下的科学计量学: 选择性计量学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(14): 52-56, 92.
8 王睿, 胡文静, 郭玮. 高Altmetrics指标科技论文学术影响力研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(21): 92-98.
9 李根, 苗琦. 2014年Altmetric中网络关注度最高的前100篇学术论文特征分析及其启示[J]. 编辑学报, 2016, 28(2): 195-198.
10 匡登辉. 从Altmetrics热点论文看科技期刊影响力——以Altmetric.com Top 100论文为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(11): 1188-1194.
11 GulS, ShuebS, HussainA. Research in the spotlight on social web: Analyzing the top 100 Altmetric articles of 2015[J]. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2016: 1488.
12 刘趁. 基于多重计量指标的论文开放获取优势研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2016.
13 刘灿, 任胜利. 世界各主要国家或地区科研投入与产出的比较分析[J]. 中国科学基金, 2016, 30(3): 283-288.
14 刘晓娟, 宋婉姿. 基于PLOS ALM的altmetrics指标可用性分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(4): 93-101.
15 AlperinJ P. Geographic variation in social media metrics: An analysis of Latin American journal articles[J]. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 2015, 67(3): 289-304.
16 HausteinS, CostasR, LarivièreV. Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: the effect of document properties and collaboration patterns[J]. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(5): e0120495.
17 刘晓娟, 余梦霞. Altmetrics覆盖率影响因素及应用分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(16): 92-101.
18 HausteinS, PetersI, Bar-IlanJ, et al. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1145-1163.
19 PooladianA, Borregoángel. Methodological issues in measuring citations in Wikipedia: a case study in Library and Information Science[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(1): 455-464.
20 PiwowarH. Altmetrics: Value all research products[J]. Nature, 2013, 493(7431): 159.
21 WoutersP, UsersCostas R., narcissism and control—Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century[M]. SURFfoundation, 2012.
22 HolmbergK, VainioJ. Why do some research articles receive more online attention and higher altmetrics? Reasons for online success according to the authors[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(1): 435-447.
23 BanshalS K, BasuA, SinghV K, et al. vsScientific. public attention: A comparison of top cited papers in WoS and top papers by Altmetric Score[C]// Proceedings of the International Workshop on Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurements and Scholarly Information Management. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 81-95. |
|
|
|
