|
|
|
| The Impact of Innovation Subject Types on the Award-Winning Patent Utilization Ability in China |
| Qiao Yongzhong, Deng Siming |
| School of Politics and Public Administration, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This study takes the “China Patent Award” project as the sample and considers region and innovation subject type as categorical variables. After confirming the dependence between the two variables and the significant correlation between the types of innovators and the application of the awarded patents, the following conclusions are drawn. In various regions, the overall application of awarded patents basically maintains the same level, as well, the awarded number is not the key factor to influence their implementation and application. In addition, the innovation subjects with the highest application rate of awarded patents in different regions are different—universities in the eastern region, cooperation subjects in the central region, enterprises and government organizations in the western region, and individual and research institutes in the northeastern region.
|
|
Received: 26 November 2018
|
|
|
|
1 张文德. 知识产权运用[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2015: 1-2.
2 吴汉东. 专利技术转化与无形资产运营[J]. 专利代理, 2016(2): 13-16.
3 毛昊. 我国专利实施和产业化的理论与政策研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2015, 27(4): 100-109.
4 RobertsS A. An analysis of stakeholder perceptions regarding the closure of the Highland Valley Copper mine[D]. Canada: University of British Columbia, 2005.
5 SvenssonR. Commercialization of patents and external finan- cing during the R&D phase[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(7): 1052-1069.
6 WeckowskaD M, Molas-GallartJ, TangP, et al. University patenting and technology commercialization–legal frameworks and the importance of local practice[J]. R&D Management, 2018, 48(1): 88-108.
7 CooperR G, Lybrand Consulting Group. Business planning in the eighties: The new marketing shape of north american corporations[M]. New York: Corgers & Lybrand/Yankelovich, Skelly & White, 1985.
8 GlickJ L. Biotechnology business models work: Evidence from the pharmaceutical marketplace[J]. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2008, 14(2): 106-117
9 王淑君. 专利商业化激励机制研究[J]. 知识产权, 2016(9): 21-27.
10 李良成, 魏双双. 基于专利商业化困境的政策分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(19): 165-172.
11 李立光, 郭艺. 高校专利成果组合转化模式与机制[J]. 中国高校科技, 2017(12): 31-32.
12 李盛竹. 我国高校专利产出规模、质量与转化影响因素的系统动力学研究——基于2007～2016年数据的实证分析[J]. 软科学, 2018, 32(8): 43-48.
13 韩寅. 创新生态视角下技术资本化机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(12): 23-27.
14 永胜. 论企业创新技术的资本化[J]. 科学管理研究, 2013, 31(3): 101-104.
15 蒋其发. 专利资本化的法律规制[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2009, 26(13): 30-33.
16 国家知识产权局[EB/OL]. (2018/1/18) [2018/10/15]. http://www.cnipa.gov.cn/twzb/gjzscqj2017nzygztjsjjygqkxwfbk/index.htm.
17 朱雪忠, 乔永忠, 詹映. 知识产权管理[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016: 100.
18 乔永忠. 不同类型创新主体发明专利维持信息实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(3): 442-447, 365.
19 姚清晨. 不同类型创新主体拥有的不同性质发明专利维持过程实证研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(3): 73-79.
20 田家林, 顾晓燕. 基于创新主体视角的区域知识产权运营效率提升对策[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2014, 35(12): 62-70.
21 钟敏, 贺林. 我国不同创新主体的创新能力分析[J]. 科学管理研究, 2008(3): 1-3, 7.
22 朱深, 曲绍卫. 我国科技创新主体创新行为差异研究——基于大学、企业和科研机构投入产出关系[J]. 新疆财经, 2012(3): 38-43.
23 孙静, 陈宝峰. 科研成果视角下农业科技创新主体功能的差异化研究[J]. 科技与经济, 2015, 28(3): 40-44. |
|
|
|
