|
|
|
| Quantitative Identification and Influencing Factors of Sleeping Beauty Papers in an Open Science Environment |
| Wang Xu1, Xue Yufei1, Qiu Junping2 |
1.School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004
2.Chinese Academy of Science and Education Evaluation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The rapid development of social media has profoundly influenced and transformed the modes of scientific communication. The rise of open science as a new research paradigm provides a new perspective and approach for studying the characteristics and influences of sleeping beauty papers. The quantitative identification and analysis of influencing factors based on multisource heterogeneous data can fully tap into the potential research value of open science. This study considers economics and computer science as representative disciplines in the social and natural sciences, respectively. Using massive citation data and altmetrics data obtained from the Web of Science and Altmetrics.com, we identified sleeping beauty papers published in the two disciplines from 1996 to 2014. To examine and compare the influencing factors of sleeping beauty papers, descriptive analyses were conducted from three aspects: sleep characteristics, wake-up mechanisms, and journal characteristics. The following conclusions were drawn. (1) It is necessary and meaningful to combine the citation frequency of papers reflecting academic attention with altmetric data reflecting social attention as raw data for identifying sleeping beauty papers. (2) Natural sciences are more prone to the emergence of sleeping beauty papers with clear sleep characteristics. Although types of research focus on the theoretical innovations and values of articles, natural science places greater emphasis on the application and improvement of existing algorithms and technologies. Papers published in high-level journals in the social sciences field may also face the situation of being awakened after years of dormancy, whereas sleeping beauty papers in the natural sciences field often appear in low-level journals. (3) Journal influence, news coverage, and social media reading were discovered to have a significant impact on the awareness of foreign sleeping beauty papers in the field of social sciences. In contrast, funding had a significant impact on the emergence of sleeping beauty papers in the natural sciences. Policy texts play a key role in both fields. (4) Compared to the achievements of foreign resource library construction, China should continue to develop altmetric data integration platforms that are adapted to local conditions.
|
|
Received: 04 December 2023
|
|
|
|
1 Barber B. Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery[J]. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 2011, 5(4): 326-335.
2 Stent G S. Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery[J]. Scientific American, 1972, 227(6): 84-93.
3 Garfield E. Premature discovery or delayed recognition - why?[J]. Current Contents, 1980, 21: 5-10.
4 van Raan A F J. Sleeping beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3): 467-472.
5 叶鹰. “睡美人”释义[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(2): 49.
6 高健航, 高继平, 师丽娟. 国内外“睡美人”现象研究的兴起与进展[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(6): 148-156.
7 曾建勋. 国家科研论文和科技信息高端交流平台构建研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2024, 50(1): 66-78.
8 Zong Q J, Huang Z H, Huang J R. Do open science badges work? Estimating the effects of open science badges on an article’s social media attention and research impacts[J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128(6): 3627-3648.
9 宋丽萍, 王建芳. 开放科学环境下负责任评价实现路径研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2024, 50(2): 115-127.
10 González-Teruel A, López-Borrull A, Santos-Hermosa G, et al. Drivers and barriers in the transition to open science: the perspective of stakeholders in the Spanish scientific community[J]. Profesional de la Información, 2022, 31(3): e310305.
11 Zhang L W, Ma L. Is open science a double-edged sword? Data sharing and the changing citation pattern of Chinese economics articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128(5): 2803-2818.
12 汪舒, 韩毅. 开放科学语境下Altmetrics数据可用性研究评述[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(11): 182-188.
13 Tay A. The open-science movement for sharing laboratory materials gains momentum[J]. Nature, 2024, 625(7996): 841-843.
14 Ferguson J, Littman R, Christensen G, et al. Survey of open science practices and attitudes in the social sciences[J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): Article No.5401.
15 McKiernan E C, Bourne P E, Brown C T, et al. How open science helps researchers succeed[J]. eLife, 2016, 5: e16800.
16 杨卫, 刘细文, 黄金霞, 等. 我国开放科学政策体系构建研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(6): 829-844.
17 张智雄, 张梦婷, 林歆, 等. 开放科学环境下全球科技期刊的发展态势[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(6): 795-805.
18 袁亚湘, 魏鑫, 汪洋, 等. 我国开放科学治理框架研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(6): 818-828.
19 余厚强. 替代计量学的理论框架研究[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(8): 775-785.
20 曾燕, 杨晓, 吴京晶. 替代计量指标的应用、问题和反思——基于发达国家科技评价政策和实践的调查[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(6): 74-83, 97.
21 王贵海, 朱学芳. 我国替代计量学研究: 现状、演进、热点与趋势[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2020, 40(8): 43-53.
22 余厚强, 李龙飞. 政策文件替代计量指标影响因素研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(7): 28-36.
23 余厚强, 章玮, 曹雪婷. 学术成果的脸书提及量分布特征研究[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(10): 1079-1091.
24 余厚强, 李佳桐. 作为替代计量数据源的中国新闻平台特点研究[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(6): 138-147, 159.
25 Costas R, van Leeuwen T N, van Raan A F J. Is scientific literature subject to a ‘sell-by-date’? A general methodology to analyze the ‘durability’ of scientific documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(2): 329-339.
26 Li J, Ye F Y. The phenomenon of all-elements-sleeping-beauties in scientific literature[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 92(3): 795-799.
27 Li J, Shi D B, Zhao S X, et al. A study of the “heartbeat spectra” for “sleeping beauties”[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(3): 493-502.
28 Ke Q, Ferrara E, Radicchi F, et al. Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(24): 7426-7431.
29 Teixeira A A C, Vieira P C, Abreu A P. Sleeping Beauties and their princes in innovation studies[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 110(2): 541-580.
30 Du J, Wu Y S. A parameter-free index for identifying under-cited sleeping beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(2): 959-971.
31 向菲, 陈华芳, 沈桐, 等. 基于Altmetrics的睡美人文献识别方法研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(10): 1166-1175.
32 Min C, Sun J J, Pei L, et al. Measuring delayed recognition for papers: uneven weighted summation and total citations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(4): 1153-1165.
33 崔静静, 胡泽文, 任萍. 基于决策树和逻辑回归模型的人工智能领域潜在“精品”论文识别研究[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(5): 90-96.
34 胡泽文, 任萍, 崔静静. 基于机器学习模型的科技论文潜在“精品”识别研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(2): 189-202.
35 胡泽文, 金昕悦, 崔静静. 基于改进BP神经网络和函数拟合的细胞生物学领域“睡美人”识别与典型应用探测[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(6): 711-728.
36 Chi Y X, Tang X Y, Liu Y J. Exploring the “awakening effect” in knowledge diffusion: a case study of publications in the library and information science domain[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(4): 101342.
37 向菲, 曹广, 沈桐, 等. 基于Altmetrics的睡美人文献特征与唤醒研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(11): 1276-1288.
38 王旭. 多元融合视域下中国学术期刊话语权评价研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(6): 114-131.
39 陈传夫. 开放科学的价值观与制度逻辑[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 76(6): 173-184.
40 邱均平, 刘亚飞, 魏开洋. 科学交流视角下学术论文影响力多维评价[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(6): 47-54.
41 侯剑华, 李昊, 张洋, 等. Altmetrics视角下科学睡美人的演化特征分析[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(9): 934-952.
42 Wang X. Research on the discourse power evaluation of academic journals from the perspective of multiple fusion: taking medicine, general and internal journals as an example[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2024, 50(4): 811-830.
43 Hou J H, Li H, Zhang Y. Identifying the princes base on altmetrics: an awakening mechanism of sleeping beauties from the perspective of social media[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(11): e0241772.
44 李秀霞, 邵作运, 刘超. 基于K值算法的图书情报领域“睡美人”文献识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(21): 114-122.
45 杜建, 武夷山. 一个用于识别睡美人文献的新的无参数指标——基于Science和Nature上睡美人文献的验证[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(2): 19-25.
46 唐洁, 曾静静. 应用变异系数识别睡美人文献研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(6): 93-101.
47 胡泽文, 任萍, 沈佳慧. 融合K值算法与三指标的神经科学领域“睡美人”论文识别及影响因素探析[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(3): 147-156.
48 关娇, 胡光元. 基金资助对科研产出的影响——基于合成生物学领域的分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(10): 1-13.
49 曾建勋. 国际“高端交流平台”成功路径分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2024, 41(4): 87-97, 109. |
|
|
|
