|
|
|
| The Influence of Fund Support on the Research Direction of Outstanding Young Scholars |
| Chen Xueyi1, Pan Yuntao1, Ma Zheng1, Zhang Guilan1, Zhang Baizhen2, Ren Qian2 |
1.Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038
2.Office of Beijing Natural Science Foundation Committee, Beijing 100000 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Young people are the driving force behind scientific and technological innovations. The science fund influences the research direction of researchers. The science fund assists young talents in making breakthroughs in innovation and focusing on the research frontier. From the perspective of “environment, motivation, and behavior,” this study conducted research in three dimensions, including theme cohesion, cooperation continuity, and team stability. This study selected seven indicators to quantify the research direction. An empirical study was conducted using the winners of the “Beijing Outstanding Youth Science Fund” from 2018 to 2020 as an example. The following findings were obtained: research topics of the scholars supported by the foundation had become more extensive, collaboration with scholars in the same field had been continuously strengthened, and the internal academic team had become more stable. By observing the comprehensive score of outstanding youth in three stages and analyzing the change in research direction, it was found that 95% of scholars tended to focus on research under the funding. The focus types included gradual focus, slow focus, steady focus, and delayed focus. The rest tended to branch out, which was closely related to the evolution and continuous integration of disciplines. From the perspective of fund project management, scholars should be guided to conduct interest-driven and target-oriented research through fund projects. Moreover, scholars should be provided with stable and continuous funding projects to ensure their continuous, in-depth research.
|
|
Received: 19 August 2022
|
|
|
|
1 程建平, 陈丽, 郑永和, 等. 新时代国家自然科学基金在国家创新体系中的战略定位[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(12): 1419-1426.
2 刘益宏, 高阵雨, 郝艳妮, 等. 新时代国家自然科学基金资助导向下项目科学问题属性分布现状梳理及有关思考[J]. 中国科学基金, 2019, 33(5): 508-514.
3 宋旭璞. 浅析科研资助对高校青年教师的激励效应[J]. 文教资料, 2016(23): 98-99.
4 罗珵. 竞争还是稳定: 国外科研经费资助方式和结构综述[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(4): 19-29.
5 Abramo G, Cicero T, D’Angelo C A. The dispersion of research performance within and between universities as a potential indicator of the competitive intensity in higher education systems[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6(2): 155-168.
6 许德坤. 凝练科研方向, 提高西藏大学科研竞争力[J]. 西藏大学学报(汉文版), 2005, 20(4): 47-49, 58.
7 韩岚, 林朝展, 赵海霞, 等. 2012—2021年国家自然科学基金中药毒理学研究方向资助项目分析[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2022, 47(5): 1415-1420.
8 Wang J, Lee Y N, Walsh J P. Funding model and creativity in science: competitive versus block funding and status contingency effects[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(6): 1070-1083.
9 郭嘉, 罗玲玲, 邢怀滨. 自然科学基金促进人才成长的对策与绩效研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(6): 92-101.
10 樊威, 刘文澜, 杨芳娟, 等. 我国博士后基金促进青年人才成长绩效分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(8): 1171-1177.
11 许光清, 邹骥. 系统动力学方法: 原理、特点与最新进展[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 8(4): 72-77.
12 Guest H S. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs-the sixth level[J]. The Psychologist, 2014, 27(12): 982-983.
13 赵伟, 包献华, 屈宝强, 等. 基础研究类创新型科技人才评价指标体系的构建[J]. 科技与经济, 2014, 27(1): 81-85.
14 田起宏, 刘正奎. 国家杰出青年科学基金获得者的一般特征和早期成长因素探析[J]. 中国高教研究, 2012(10): 21-24.
15 马亮, 吴建南, 时仲毅. 科研项目绩效的影响因素: 医学科学基金面上项目的实证分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2012, 33(7): 12-20.
16 童夏雨. 省级科学基金与青年科技人才成长及科研绩效关系——基于1996—2015年浙江省杰出青年科学基金的实证研究[J]. 高等农业教育, 2017(4): 21-26.
17 Sandstr?m U, Van den Besselaar P. Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(1): 365-384.
18 赵伟, 徐琳. 基础研究青年拔尖人才的关键成长路径研究——基于信息科学领域国家杰出青年科学基金获得者的分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012, 32(6): 117-119, 124.
19 田人合, 郑军卫, 张志强, 等. 科技人力资本视角下杰青科学家资助年龄对资助效果的影响——以杰青基金地球科学项目为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(22): 91-105.
20 刘云, 杨芳娟. 我国高端科技人才计划资助科研产出特征分析[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(S1): 610-622.
21 Zhou P, Tian H B. Funded collaboration research in mathematics in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 99(3): 695-715.
22 蔡小静, 吕晓赞, 周萍. 影响国际科研合作效果的重要因素初探——文献计量学视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(7): 38-45.
23 Guerrero Bote V P, Olmeda-Gómez C, de Moya-Anegón F. Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(2): 392-404.
24 郭红, 潘云涛, 马峥, 等. 国家自然科学基金资助产出论文计量分析[J]. 科技导报, 2011, 29(27): 61-66.
25 赵蓉英, 魏绪秋. 基于比较静态分析的国际合作与交流特征演化研究——以我国图书情报学为例[J]. 图书馆, 2017(8): 27-31, 49.
26 Ma A, Mondragón R J, Latora V. Anatomy of funded research in science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(48): 14760-14765.
27 贾珍臻, 崔琰琳, 黄炳家, 等. “优青”获得者高水平论文信息挖掘及其对青年人才成长的启示意义[J]. 内江科技, 2021, 42(6): 72-74, 155.
28 欧桂燕, 岳名亮, 吴江, 等. 杰出青年科研人员学术职业生涯科研合作特征演变分析——以化学领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(7): 756-767.
29 Shelton R D. Scientometric laws connecting publication counts to national research funding[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 123(1): 181-206.
30 Lee Y N, Walsh J P, Wang J. Creativity in scientific teams: unpacking novelty and impact[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(3): 684-697.
31 田人合. 政府资助人才项目绩效评估与人才成长规律研究——以国家杰出青年科学基金地球科学项目为例[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2018: 78-83.
32 宫婉婷. 科研基金资助投入与论文产出分析[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2021, 24(19): 179-183.
33 章凯. 激励理论新解[J]. 科学管理研究, 2003, 21(2): 89-92, 98.
34 程启月. 评测指标权重确定的结构熵权法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(7): 1225-1228.
35 陈伟, 夏建华. 综合主、客观权重信息的最优组合赋权方法[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2007, 37(1): 17-22.
36 北京大学材料科学与工程学院. 师资队伍[EB/OL]. [2022-06-28]. http://www.mse.pku.edu.cn/info/1204/1242.htm.
37 首都医科大学. 人才资源[EB/OL]. [2022-06-28]. https://www.ccmu.edu.cn/rczy_6468/lyys_6470/index.htm. |
|
|
|
