|
|
|
| Literature Metadata Integration |
| Qiujing Ding1,2, Jianxun Zeng2 |
1.School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072
2.Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The development in digital publishing has gradually reduced the advantages of bibliographic data integration in libraries and information institutions that have acquisition and cataloguing as their core functions. They lag behind publishers and integrators scale, depth and application of data. Publishers and integrators strengthen the integration of literature metadata through fine-grained data processing, semantic association, and large-scale storage. The modern information service industry has undergone significant changes. Owing to the challenges of lagging metadata management and limited copyright of full-text service, libraries and information institutions need to pay greater attention to the local accumulation and application of literature metadata on the basis of the construction of full-text resources. The development of a modern information service system is supported by the collection and acquisition of literature metadata from multiple sources, integrations and semantic organization, based on various literature elements. Knowledge discovery services can be carried based on the integrated metadata. In the end， the content and significance of information resources can be fully reflected, and metadata development strategy can be practiced.
|
|
Received: 28 November 2018
|
|
|
|
1 Unlocking the Value: The British Library’s collection metadata strategy2015-2018[EB/OL]. [2018-6-28]. https://www.bl.uk/bibliographic/pdfs/british-library-collection-metadata-strategy-2015-2018.pdf.
2 杰弗里·波梅兰茨. 元数据[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2017.
3 肖珑, 赵亮. 中文元数据概论与实例[M]. 北京: 北京图书馆出版社, 2007.
4 吴开华, 邢春晓, 罗德胤. 数字图书馆元数据研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2002(3): 43-46.
5 曾建勋. 资源建设需要推进元数据战略[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2017(11): 1.
6 刘歆. 领域数据集成及服务关键技术研究[D]. 北京：北京科技大学, 2017.
7 窦天芳, 姜爱蓉. 资源发现系统功能分析及应用前景[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(7): 38-43.
8 聂华, 朱玲. 网络级发现服务——通向深度整合与便捷获取的路径[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2011, 29(6): 5-10, 25.
9 袁玉英. 常用几种资源发现系统对比分析研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2015(9): 38-41.
10 苏建华. 图书馆选择资源发现系统的策略分析——以资源发现系统与学术搜索引擎的比较为视角[J]. 情报科学, 2015(6): 91-94, 105.
11 包凌, 蒋颖. 图书馆统一资源发现系统的比较研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2012(5): 67-72.
12 Journal Article (JA)DTD5.5. 0[EB/OL]. [2018-02-22]. https://www.elsevier.com/authors/author-schemas/DTD-5.5.0.
13 张晓林. 开放元数据机制: 理念与原则[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2003(3): 9-14.
14 陈春颖. 数据清洗技术在期刊元数据整合中的应用[J]. 图书情报知识, 2009(6): 87-90.
15 赵捷. 面向发现服务的图书馆元数据集成管理系统构建研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2018(7): 11-21.
16 LiG L, WangJ N, ZhengY D, et al. Crowdsourced data management: A survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2016, 28(9): 2296-2319.
17 YakoutM, ElmagarmidA K, NevilleJ, et al. Guided data repair[J]. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2011, 4(5): 279-289.
18 彭佳, 郑巧英, 张晗, 等. 基于元数据本体的特色资源深度聚合研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2016, 35(11): 82-89.
19 LeFurgyW G. Building preservation partnerships: The Library of Congress National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program[J]. Library Trends, 2005, 54(1): 495-500.
20 AgarwalR, SelenW. Dynamic capability building in service value networks for achieving service innovation[J]. Decision Sciences, 2009, 40(3): 340-356.
21 Governance and committees[EB/OL]. [2018-2-22]. https://www.ohiolink.edu/content/governance_and_committees.
22 ColaqoJ, MoraaH. Digital libraries: Stimulating open innovation through crowd sourcing and transparency[EB/OL]. [2018-2-22]. https://www.ifla.org/past-wlic/2012/94-colaco-en.pdf.
23 肖希明, 李琪. 公共数字文化服务合作机制研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2016(4): 31-37.
24 平洋. 面向开放式创新的国防科技信息资源保障研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012, 35(10): 85-89.
25 杨新涯, 魏群义, 许天才, 等. 论新一代图书馆系统的特征[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2017, 37(7): 2-8.
26 孙广芝, 邢立强, 张保玉. 数字出版元数据基础[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2013. |
|
|
|
