|
|
|
| The Process Model and Mechanism of Value Co-Creation for Open Data Competitions in Digital Humanities |
| Zhang Yan1, Zhao Yuxiang2, Liu Wei3, Zhu Qinghua2 |
1.Research Institute for Data Management & Innovation, Nanjing University, Suzhou 215163
2.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
3.Shanghai Library, Shanghai 200031 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Open and shared data play crucial roles in building data ecosystems. Open data competition in digital humanities can facilitate the transformation of cultural digitization achievements and promote widespread accessibility. An exploratory case study approach from the perspective of service ecosystems was adopted for this study, and data were obtained from four editions of the Shanghai Library Open Data Competition to analyze the process and underlying mechanisms of value co-creation among competition actors. This research identified the emerging values—historical, economic, experiential, social, cultural, and societal—generated from open data competitions in digital humanities. The co-creation process model encompasses value consensus, co-generation, co-integration, and co-dissemination. An iterative transformation between implicit value propositions and explicit product values forms a continuous and dynamic spiral of value co-creation. The value output of the competition demonstrates a trend of sustained growth as the ecosystem continued to expand. This study supplements phenomenological research on value co-creation processes and mechanisms from the perspective of service ecosystems and provides recommendations for open innovation information practices in the digital humanities.
|
|
Received: 20 September 2023
|
|
|
|
1 Kitchin R. The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences[M]. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014.
2 Zeng M L. Semantic enrichment for enhancing LAM data and supporting digital humanities[J]. El Profesional De La Información, 2019, 28(1): e280103.
3 张妍, 赵宇翔, 刘周颖. 数字人文领域创意类开放数据竞赛价值共创的影响因素——以上海图书馆开放数据竞赛为例[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2023, 43(3): 75-85.
4 赵宇翔, 张妍, 夏翠娟, 等. 数字人文视域下文化记忆机构价值共创研究及实践述评[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(1): 99-117.
5 张春景, 夏翠娟. 开放数据竞赛在红色文化信息资源开发利用中的价值贡献研究——以上海图书馆开放数据竞赛为例[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2021, 11(4): 25-32.
6 Prahalad C K, Ramaswamy V. Co-creating unique value with customers[J]. Strategy & Leadership, 2004, 32(3): 4-9.
7 Vargo S L, Maglio P P, Akaka M A. On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective[J]. European Management Journal, 2008, 26(3): 145-152.
8 袁静, 李森涛. 用户参与政府开放数据价值共创动因研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2023, 19(2): 1-9.
9 曹雨佳. 政府开放数据生态链中的用户参与机制——以加拿大政府数据开放实践为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(6): 18-27.
10 赵宇翔, 仝冲, 张妍. 数字人文开放数据竞赛中行动者协作特征研究[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2020, 40(11): 56-67.
11 吴金华, 石静, 徐健. 面向数字人文的开放数据生态系统: 构成要素与模型框架[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(22): 44-54.
12 赵宇翔, 张妍, 仝冲, 等. 面向价值共创的数字人文类开放数据竞赛行动者协作行为研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(1): 112-119.
13 Prahalad C K, Ramaswamy V. Co-opting customer competence[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2000, 78(1): 79-90.
14 Kohler T. Crowdsourcing-based business models: how to create and capture value[J]. California Management Review, 2015, 57(4): 63-84.
15 Poetz M K, Schreier M. The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2012, 29(2): 245-256.
16 Nishikawa H, Schreier M, Fuchs C, et al. The value of marketing crowdsourced new products as such: evidence from two randomized field experiments[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2017, 54(4): 525-539.
17 Bonabeau E. Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2009, 50(2): 45-52.
18 Ye H, Kankanhalli A. Leveraging crowdsourcing for organizational value co-creation[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2013, 33: Article 13.
19 赵宇翔, 刘周颖, 刘炜, 等. 创意类开放数据竞赛作品评价指标体系构建与测定——以数字人文项目为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(2): 75-95.
20 He H R, Kotlarsky J, Nevo D. A process perspective on emerging value in tournament-based and collaborative crowdsourcing[C]// Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2021: 4209-4218.
21 Akaka M A, Parry G. Value-in-context: an exploration of the context of value and the value of context[M]// Handbook of Service Science. Cham: Springer, 2019: 457-477.
22 杨学成, 涂科. 出行共享中的用户价值共创机理——基于优步的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017(8): 154-169.
23 江积海, 李琴. 平台型商业模式创新中连接属性影响价值共创的内在机理——Airbnb的案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(7): 252-260.
24 Autio E, Thomas L D W. Value co-creation in ecosystems: insights and research promise from three disciplinary perspectives[M]// Handbook of Digital Innovation. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020: 107-132.
25 Osborne S P. From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation?[J]. Public Management Review, 2018, 20(2): 225-231.
26 Prahalad C K, Ramaswamy V. Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2004, 18(3): 5-14.
27 Vargo S L, Lusch R F. Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2016, 44(1): 5-23.
28 Vargo S L, Lusch R F. From repeat patronage to value co-creation in service ecosystems: a transcending conceptualization of relationship[J]. Journal of Business Market Management, 2010, 4(4): 169-179.
29 Clement T E, Carter D. Connecting theory and practice in digital humanities information work[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(6): 1385-1396.
30 Lusch R F, Nambisan S. Service innovation[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2015, 39(1): 155-176.
31 张磊, 夏翠娟. 面向数字人文的图书馆开放数据服务研究——以上海图书馆开放数据应用开发竞赛为例[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2018, 37(3): 33-38, 48.
32 Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1): 25-32.
33 罗伯特·K.殷. 案例研究方法的应用[M]. 3版. 周海涛, 夏欢欢, 译. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2014.
34 文化和旅游研究-上海图书馆基地工作简报[EB/OL]. (2021-07-05) [2023-02-10]. http://pcrc.library.sh.cn/reportsArticle_42.html.
35 Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(4): 691-710.
36 Giddens A. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
37 Miles M B, Huberman A M. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook[M]. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.
38 Gioia D A, Corley K G, Hamilton A L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2013, 16(1): 15-31.
39 毛基业. 运用结构化的数据分析方法做严谨的质性研究——中国企业管理案例与质性研究论坛(2019)综述[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(3): 221-227.
40 Javadi Khasraghi H, Wang X, Li Y J. Crowdsourcing contests: understanding the effect of environment and organization specific factors on sustained participation[C]// Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2020: 178-187.
41 周文辉, 曹裕, 周依芳. 共识、共生与共赢: 价值共创的过程模型[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(8): 129-135.
42 周文辉. 知识服务、价值共创与创新绩效——基于扎根理论的多案例研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(4): 567-573, 626.
43 Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
44 Vargo S L, Wieland H, Akaka M A. Innovation through institutionalization: a service ecosystems perspective[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2015, 44: 63-72.
45 Storbacka K, Brodie R J, B?hmann T, et al. Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(8): 3008-3017.
46 Juell-Skielse G, Hjalmarsson A, Juell-Skielse E, et al. Contests as innovation intermediaries in open data markets[J]. Information Polity, 2014, 19(3/4): 247-262.
47 Laverty S M. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations[J]. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2003, 2(3): 21-35. |
|
|
|
