参考文献跨学科性与论文学术影响力的关系研究

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2023.05.002

情报学报

2023, Vol. 42

Issue (5): 525-536 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2023.05.002

情报理论与方法

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

参考文献跨学科性与论文学术影响力的关系研究

刘嘉明^1,2, 孙建军^1,3

1.南京大学数据智能与交叉创新实验室,南京 210023
2.南京大学数字经济与管理学院,苏州 215163
3.南京大学信息管理学院,南京 210023

Research on the Relationship between Interdisciplinarity of References and Academic Influence

Liu Jiaming^1,2, Sun Jianjun^1,3

1.Laboratory of Data Intelligence and Interdisciplinary Innovation, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
2.School of Digital Economics and Management, Nanjing University, Suzhou 215163
3.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (9)

全文: PDF (900 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要探究参考文献跨学科性与论文学术影响力的关系，能够为学科领域的进一步发展提出参考建议，对促进科学发展具有重要意义。本研究以Web of Science核心合集2001—2020年仿生学领域的期刊论文和会议论文为数据集，从学科丰富性、平衡性、差异性及综合角度，对参考文献跨学科性与论文学术影响力之间的关系进行探讨，并比较其在不同合作模式下的区别。研究结果表明，综合性指标Rao-Stirling指数负向影响学术影响力；学科丰富性、平衡性和差异性对学术影响力的积极影响均存在阈值；不同合作模式下，参考文献跨学科性与论文学术影响力的关系有一定区别。进行学科交叉科研活动时，在学科丰富性、平衡性和差异性方面都要遵循适度原则；根据合作者的性质采取不同的合作策略；积极与国际高水平机构交流、合作；高等院校则应该加强学科交叉培养，打造知识复合型人才。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘嘉明
	孙建军

关键词 ：参考文献, 跨学科性, 学术影响力, 合作模式, 仿生学

收稿日期: 2022-08-01

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目“引文扩散理论及实证研究”（71874077）。

作者简介: 刘嘉明，女，1997年生，博士研究生，主要研究方向为科学计量、创新管理等，E-mail：602022000038@smail.nju.edu.cn；孙建军，男，1962年生，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为网络信息资源管理、信息分析研究等；

引用本文:

刘嘉明, 孙建军. 参考文献跨学科性与论文学术影响力的关系研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(5): 525-536.
Liu Jiaming, Sun Jianjun. Research on the Relationship between Interdisciplinarity of References and Academic Influence. 情报学报, 2023, 42(5): 525-536.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2023.05.002 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2023/V42/I5/525

1 刘仲林. 交叉科学时代的交叉研究[J]. 科学学研究, 1993, 11(2): 9-16.
2 Steele T W, Stier J C. The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: a forestry case study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000, 51(5): 476-484.
3 刘雪立, 赵俊玲. 图书情报学期刊和论文的跨学科强度与其学术影响力的关系[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2021, 32(3): 411-417.
4 张雪, 刘昊, 张志强. 不同合作模式下的学科交叉程度与文献学术影响力关系研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(8): 164-172.
5 Yegros-Yegros A, Rafols I, D’Este P. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8): e0135095.
6 王菲菲, 贾晨冉, 刘俊婉, 等. 交叉学科中文献学术价值的成长与老化研究 ——以医学信息学为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(2): 11-22.
7 Chang Y W, Huang M H. A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: using three bibliometric methods[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(1): 22-33.
8 Larivière V, Gingras Y. On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(1): 126-131.
9 van Houten B A, Phelps J, Barnes M, et al. Evaluating scientific impact[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000, 108(9): A392-A393.
10 何春建. 单篇论文学术影响力评价指标构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(4): 98-107.
11 杨思洛. 引文分析存在的问题及其原因探究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(3): 108-117.
12 宋歌. 网络分析方法在引文分析中的整合研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(4): 106-114.
13 王雯霞, 刘春丽. 不同学科间论文影响力评价指标模型的差异性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(13): 108-116.
14 Cheung M K. Altmetrics: too soon for use in assessment[J]. Nature, 2013, 494(7436): 176.
15 Sugimoto C R, Ni C Q, Russell T G, et al. Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: an examination of dissertation networks in Library and Information Science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(9): 1808-1828.
16 Abramo G, D'Angelo C A, Di Costa F. Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(11): 2206-2222.
17 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 黄颖. 跨学科合作模式下的交叉科学测度研究——以ESI社会科学领域高被引学者为例[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(3): 231-242.
18 Porter A L, Cohen A S, Roessner J D, et al. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1): 117-147.
19 Wang X F, Wang Z N, Huang Y, et al. Measuring interdisciplinarity of a research system: detecting distinction between publication categories and citation categories[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(3): 2023-2039.
20 黄颖, 高天舒, 王志楠, 等. 基于Web of Science分类的跨学科测度研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(3): 124-132.
21 黄颖, 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 等. 跨学科的三维测度——外部知识融合、内在知识会聚与科学合作模式[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(1): 25-35.
22 华萌, 陈仕吉, 周群, 等. 多学科期刊论文学科划分方法研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(5): 76-80, 22.
23 章成志, 吴小兰. 跨学科研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(5): 523-535.
24 张雪, 张志强. 学科交叉研究系统综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(14): 112-125.
25 Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719.
26 Rafols I, Meyer M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(2): 263-287.
27 Porter A L, Chubin D E. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(3): 161-176.
28 Porter A L, Rafols I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 719-745.
29 Leydesdorff L, Rafols I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(1): 87-100.
30 Hamers L, Hemeryck Y, Herweyers G, et al. Similarity measures in scientometric research: the Jaccard index versus Salton’s cosine formula[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1989, 25(3): 315-318.
31 Chen K H, Liang C F. Disciplinary interflow of library and information science[J]. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 2004, 2(2): 31-55.
32 Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(4): 623-656.
33 Simpson E H. Measurement of diversity[J]. Nature, 1949, 163(4148): 688.
34 Brillouin L, Hellwarth R W. Science and information theory[J]. Physics Today, 1956, 9(12): 39-40.
35 Grant R M, Jammine A P, Thomas H. Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1972-84[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31(4): 771-801.
36 Montgomery C A, Wernerfelt B. Diversification, ricardian rents, and Tobin’s Q[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1988, 19(4): 623-632.
37 Zhang L, Rousseau R, Gl?nzel W. Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: taking similarity between subject fields into account[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5): 1257-1265.
38 Bromham L, Dinnage R, Hua X. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7609): 684-687.
39 Leydesdorff L, Wagner C S, Bornmann L. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 255-269.
40 Leydesdorff L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(9): 1303-1319.
41 李长玲, 纪雪梅, 支岭. 基于E-I指数的学科交叉程度分析——以情报学等5个学科为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(16): 33-36.
42 Egghe L, Rousseau R. BRS-compactness in networks: theoretical considerations related to cohesion in citation graphs, collaboration networks and the Internet[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2003, 37(7/8): 879-899.
43 陈赛君, 陈智高. 领域交叉性分析指标与方法新探及其实证研究[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(11): 1184-1195.
44 Qin J, Lancaster F W, Allen B. Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997, 48(10): 893-916.
45 王文平, 刘云, 何颖, 等. 国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究——基于文献计量学分析的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(3): 127-137.
46 路甬祥. 仿生学的意义与发展[J]. 科学中国人, 2004(4): 22-24.
47 ESI journal list[EB/OL]. [2021-12-30]. http://esi.help.clarivate.com/Content/journal-list.htm.
48 Wang J, Thijs B, Gl?nzel W. Interdisciplinarity and impact: distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5): e0127298.
49 Leydesdorff L. A method for generating overlay maps on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citation relations in 2015[EB/OL]. [2021-12-30]. http://www.leydesdorff.net/wc15/index.htm.
50 梁春慧, 孙艳, 万跃华. 高被引论文的参考文献特征研究——以化学领域为例的实证分析[J]. 科技与出版, 2014(7): 119-122.
51 Smart J C, Bayer A E. Author collaboration and impact: a note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles[J]. Scientometrics, 1986, 10: 297-305.
52 Card D, DellaVigna S. Page limits on economics articles: evidence from two journals[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014, 28(3): 149-168.
53 孟璀, 吴培群, 于发友. 论文学术影响力及其影响因素的实证分析——以CNKI平台的教育内容分析论文为例[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(S1): 536-542.
54 Gazni A, Didegah F. Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(2): 251-265.
55 Lind J T, Mehlum H. With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2010, 72(1): 109-118.