Analysis of Change in Research Collaboration Patterns and the Role of Scientific Researchers—Authors in Virology with a Career Period of at Least 30 Years
Zhang Lihua1, Tian Dan1, Qu Jiansheng2
1.Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006 2.Lanzhou Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000
摘要在大科学时代，科研合作现象日益普遍，很多高水平研究成果都是合作的产物。在科研合作中，科研人员可能采用不同的合作模式，并承担不同的科研角色。探讨较长职业生涯中作者群科研合作模式与科研角色的变化，有助于更好地理解科研人员群体的新陈代谢规律。选择病毒学领域职业生涯至少为30年的736名科研人员为研究对象，分析这些科研人员在不同时间窗的COPP（average number of authors per paper）指标、COPS（number of co-authors per stage）指标、合作模式指标、科研角色的变化情况，并分析前3个指标与科研角色之间的相关性。研究结果表明，随着职业生涯的发展，作者群所在的研究团队规模和合作广度在不断扩大；主要作者的比例在不断下降，而支持型作者的比例在不断增长；超过80%的科研人员角色会发生变化，且至多变化两次；科研团队规模、合作广度、合作模式与科研角色之间几乎不存在相关关系。
张丽华, 田丹, 曲建升. 科研合作模式与科研人员角色的变化规律分析——以病毒学领域职业生涯至少为30年的作者为例[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(7): 719-730.
Zhang Lihua, Tian Dan, Qu Jiansheng. Analysis of Change in Research Collaboration Patterns and the Role of Scientific Researchers—Authors in Virology with a Career Period of at Least 30 Years. 情报学报, 2020, 39(7): 719-730.
1 West J D, Jacquet J, King M M, et al. The role of gender in scholarly authorship[J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(7): e66212. 2 Wuchty S, Jones B F, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5827): 1036-1039. 3 Leahey E. From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2016, 42: 81-100. 4 Bozeman B, Corley E. Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(4): 599-616. 5 Leahey E, Reikowsky R C. Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2008, 38(3): 425-440. 6 Feeney M K, Welch E W. Academic outcomes among principal investigators, co-principal investigators, and non-PI researchers[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014, 39(1): 111-133. 7 Yin Z F, Zhi Q. Dancing with the academic elite: A promotion or hindrance of research production?[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 110(1): 17-41. 8 Kastrin A, Klisara J, Lu?ar B, et al. Is science driven by principal investigators?[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(2): 1157-1182. 9 Hu Z G, Chen C M, Liu Z Y. How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists?[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1553-1564. 10 Milojevi? S, Radicchi F, Walsh J P. Changing demographics of scientific careers: The rise of the temporary workforce[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(50): 12616-12623. 11 胡志刚, 刘则渊, 王贤文. 期刊作者群的新陈代谢规律研究[J]. 情报学报, 2011, 30(11): 1194-1200. 12 Verbree M, Horlings E, Groenewegen P, et al. Organizational factors influencing scholarly performance: A multivariate study of biomedical research groups[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1): 25-49. 13 Sugimoto C R, Sugimoto T J, Tsou A, et al. Age stratification and cohort effects in scholarly communication: A study of social sciences[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 997-1016. 14 Brogaard J, Engelberg J, van Wesep E. Do economists swing for the fences after tenure?[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018, 32(1): 179-194. 15 姜春林, 王文苑. 科学计量学普赖斯奖获得者Péter Vinkler学术成就介评[J]. 科技管理研究, 2013, 33(12): 238-241. 16 Glanzel W. Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies[J]. Library Trends, 2002, 50(3): 461-473. 17 Maske K L, Durden G C, Gaynor P E. Determinants of scholarly productivity among male and female economists[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2003, 41(4): 555-564. 18 张丽华, 田丹, 曲建升. 中国学者发表会议论文的领域差异性与载体差异性研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(6): 133-140.
