科研团队成员国别差异性的测度、演变及其与团队产出影响力的关系

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.07.005

情报学报

2024, Vol. 43

Issue (7): 818-838 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.07.005

情报理论与方法

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

科研团队成员国别差异性的测度、演变及其与团队产出影响力的关系

柳美君¹, 步一^2,3, 杨斯杰³

1.复旦大学全球公共政策研究院,上海 200433
2.北京大学信息管理系,北京 100871
3.北京大学信息化与信息管理研究中心,北京 100871

The Measurement, Evolution, and Relationship between Country Disparity and Team Impact

Liu Meijun¹, Bu Yi^2,3, Yang Sijie³

1.Institute for Global Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433
2.Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871
3.Center for Informationalization and Information Management Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (7)

全文: PDF (4563 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要国际科学合作已成为知识创造的一条重要途径，有利于科学突破的产生。这种合作形式不仅反映了个体科学家的合作动机，还体现了国家在社会经济和科学活动等方面的依赖性与合作性。本文通过考察论文团队成员的国别属性，探讨了成员差异与团队产出影响力之间的关系。首先，本文从地理、经济、文化和科学活动等多个维度量化了国家间距离，运用主成分分析法提取了3个主要成分来衡量国家间的综合性差异，并计算了论文成员的差异分数。其次，本文研究了这些差异分数与团队产出影响力之间的关系。研究结果表明，论文成员的文化差异和科研投入差异与团队产出影响力之间呈现显著负相关关系，科学合作差异则与团队产出影响力之间存在显著正相关关系。本文的研究结论为组建、维护和管理跨国科研团队提供了政策建议，有助于提高跨国科研团队的绩效水平。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	柳美君
	步一
	杨斯杰

关键词 ：科研团队, 跨国科学合作, 差异性, 多样性, 团队产出影响力

收稿日期: 2023-05-29

基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“国际公共卫生紧急事件下的科学合作演变及其模式的研究”（72104054）；国家自然科学基金重点项目“公共治理体系变革创新的理论与机制”（72234001）；国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“基于因果推断的高学术影响力跨学科团队早期识别研究”（72104007）。

作者简介: 柳美君，女，1992年生，青年副研究员，主要研究领域为信息计量与科技情报，E-mail：meijunliu@fudan.edu.cn；步一，男，1994年生，助理教授，研究员，主要研究领域为信息计量与科技情报；杨斯杰，男，1993年生，研究助理，主要研究领域为知识发现与数据挖掘；

引用本文:

柳美君, 步一, 杨斯杰. 科研团队成员国别差异性的测度、演变及其与团队产出影响力的关系[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43(7): 818-838.
Liu Meijun, Bu Yi, Yang Sijie. The Measurement, Evolution, and Relationship between Country Disparity and Team Impact. 情报学报, 2024, 43(7): 818-838.

链接本文:

https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2024.07.005 或 https://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2024/V43/I7/818

1 石静, 孙建军. 科技创新团队的知识网络构建与知识测度研究[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(9): 900-914.
2 Adams J. The fourth age of research[J]. Nature, 2013, 497(7451): 557-560.
3 Bornmann L, Wagner C, Leydesdorff L. BRICS countries and scientific excellence: a bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(7): 1507-1513.
4 Wagner C S, Park H W, Leydesdorff L. The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: a conundrum for national governments[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(7): e0131816.
5 He T W. International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(3): 571-582.
6 Wagner C S, Whetsell T A, Leydesdorff L. Growth of international collaboration in science: revisiting six specialties[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 110(3): 1633-1652.
7 丁洁兰, 刘细文. 科学合作的多样性研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(11): 129-138.
8 Zhang C W, Bu Y, Ding Y, et al. Understanding scientific collaboration: homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(1): 72-86.
9 Tajfel H. Human groups and social categories: studies in social psychology[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
10 Turner J C, Hogg M A, Oakes P J, et al. Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
11 McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2001, 27(1): 415-444.
12 Boschini A, Sj?gren A. Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns[J]. Journal of Labor Economics, 2007, 25(2): 325-365.
13 Freeman R B, Huang W. Collaborating with people like me: ethnic coauthorship within the United States[J]. Journal of Labor Economics, 2015, 33(S1): S289-S318.
14 Sie R L L, Drachsler H, Bitter-Rijpkema M, et al. To whom and why should I connect? Co-author recommendation based on powerful and similar peers[J]. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2012, 4(1-2): 121-137.
15 Carton A M, Cummings J N. A theory of subgroups in work teams[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2012, 37(3): 441-470.
16 van Knippenberg D, Schippers M C. Work group diversity[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2007, 58: 515-541.
17 Kearney E, Gebert D, Voelpel S C. When and how diversity benefits teams: the importance of team members' need for cognition[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(3): 581-598.
18 Liu M J, Bu Y, Chen C Y, et al. Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty: evidence from COVID-19[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022, 73(8): 1065-1078.
19 Nielsen M W, Alegria S, B?rjeson L, et al. Gender diversity leads to better science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(8): 1740-1742.
20 Xu H M, Bu Y, Liu M J, et al. Team power dynamics and team impact: new perspectives on scientific collaboration using career age as a proxy for team power[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022, 73(10): 1489-1505.
21 唐惠燕, 陈蓉蓉, 郑新艳, 等. 馆员合作研究中馆员多样性的考察与分析——基于南京农业大学图书馆的案例分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(11): 64-71.
22 Wagner C S, Whetsell T A, Mukherjee S. International research collaboration: novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(5): 1260-1270.
23 廖青云, 朱东华, 汪雪锋, 等. 科研团队的多样性对团队绩效的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(6): 1074-1083.
24 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 黄颖. 跨学科合作模式下的交叉科学测度研究——以ESI社会科学领域高被引学者为例[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(3): 231-242.
25 Liu M J, Jaiswal A, Bu Y, et al. Team formation and team impact: the balance between team freshness and repeat collaboration[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(4): 101337.
26 许玉婵, 梁启华, 张春阳. 跨国科学合作网络结构的多样性特征及动态演化研究——以知识管理领域为例[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2017, 2(3): 214-223.
27 杨靓, 曾德明, 邹思明, 等. 科学合作网络、知识多样性与企业技术创新绩效[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(5): 867-875.
28 Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719.
29 Ponomarev I V, Lawton B K, Williams D E, et al. Breakthrough paper indicator 2.0: can geographical diversity and interdisciplinarity improve the accuracy of outstanding papers prediction?[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(3): 755-765.
30 Fan X, Yang X W, Chen L M. Diversified resources and academic influence: patterns of university-industry collaboration in Chinese research-oriented universities[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(2): 489-509.
31 Abbasi A, Jaafari A. Research impact and scholars’ geographical diversity[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(3): 683-692.
32 Barjak F, Robinson S. International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance[J]. Social Geography, 2008, 3(1): 23-36.
33 Harrison D A, Klein K J. What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(4): 1199-1228.
34 Zhang L, Rousseau R, Gl?nzel W. Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: taking similarity between subject fields into account[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5): 1257-1265.
35 Dong Y X, Ma H, Tang J, et al. Collaboration diversity and scientific impact[OL]. (2018-06-10). http://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.03694v1.
36 Leinster T, Cobbold C A. Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity[J]. Ecology, 2012, 93(3): 477-489.
37 Liu M J, Zhang N, Hu X, et al. Further divided gender gaps in research productivity and collaboration during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from coronavirus-related literature[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(2): 101295.
38 Rafols I, Meyer M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(2): 263-287.
39 Guan J C, Yan Y, Zhang J J. How do collaborative features affect scientific output? Evidences from wind power field[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1): 333-355.
40 Stvilia B, Hinnant C C, Schindler K, et al. Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(2): 270-283.
41 Wang J, Thijs B, Gl?nzel W. Interdisciplinarity and impact: distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5): e0127298.
42 Zhang L, Sun B B, Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, et al. Interdisciplinarity and collaboration: on the relationship between disciplinary diversity in departmental affiliations and reference lists[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(1): 271-291.
43 Zhang C W, Bu Y, Ding Y. Does diversity of team members affect scientific success of a team? A preliminary study[C/OL]// iConference 2019 Proceedings. iSchools, (2019-03-15). https://doi.org/10.21900/iconf.2019.103375.
44 Fiske S T, Cuddy A J C, Glick P, et al. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82(6): 878-902.
45 Kunze F, Boehm S A, Bruch H. Age diversity, age discrimination climate and performance consequences—a cross organizational study[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011, 32(2): 264-290.
46 van Knippenberg D, de Dreu C K W, Homan A C. Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89(6): 1008-1022.
47 Goncalo J A, Polman E, Maslach C. Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010, 113(1): 13-24.
48 Jehn K A, Northcraft G B, Neale M A. Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(4): 741-763.
49 Nielsen M W, Bloch C W, Schiebinger L. Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2018, 2(10): 726-734.
50 Yang Y, Tian T Y, Woodruff T K, et al. Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119(36): e2200841119.
51 Gl?nzel W, de Lange C. A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(1): 75-89.
52 Bordons M, Aparicio J, Costas R. Heterogeneity of collaboration and its relationship with research impact in a biomedical field[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(2): 443-466.
53 Wu D S, Lu X L, Li J P, et al. Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 124(2): 1579-1597.
54 Pelled L H, Eisenhardt K M, Xin K R. Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(1): 1-28.
55 Milliken F J, Martins L L. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(2): 402-433.
56 赵毅, 章成志, 习海旭. 影响不同子领域国际合作的距离因素相同吗?——来自计算机科学学科的证据[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(12): 1458-1476.
57 Katz J S. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, 31(1): 31-43.
58 Luukkonen T, Tijssen R J W, Persson O, et al. The measurement of international scientific collaboration[J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 28(1): 15-36.
59 Davids M, Frenken K. Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: towards an integrated framework[J]. Regional Studies, 2018, 52(1): 23-34.
60 O’Leary M B, Cummings J N. The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(3): 433-452.
61 Ponds R, van Oort F, Frenken K. The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2007, 86(3): 423-444.
62 Staples D S, Zhao L N. The effects of cultural diversity in virtual teams versus face-to-face teams[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2006, 15(4): 389-406.
63 Gibson C B, Zellmer-Bruhn M E. Metaphors and meaning: an intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001, 46(2): 274-303.
64 唐旭丽, 李信. 科研团队多样性对学术颠覆性创新的影响研究——以人工智能领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(1): 43-58.
65 Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, et al. Atypical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472.
66 Vaara E, Sarala R, Stahl G, et al. The impact of organizational and national cultural differences on social conflict and knowledge transfer in international acquisitions[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49(1): 1-27.
67 Ding J L, Shen Z S, Ahlgren P, et al. The link between ethnic diversity and scientific impact: the mediating effect of novelty and audience diversity[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(9): 7759-7810.
68 AlShebli B K, Rahwan T, Woon W L. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 5163.
69 汤怡洁, 张敏, 丁晓芹. 基于关联数据的集成信息平台语义化实现方法研究[J]. 现代情报, 2016, 36(6): 66-73.
70 Ley M. DBLP: some lessons learned[J]. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2009, 2(2): 1493-1500.
71 Kuhn T S. The structure of scientific revolutions: 50th anniversary edition[M]. 4th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
72 Hoekman J, Frenken K, Tijssen R J W. Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(5): 662-673.
73 Welch D E, Welch L S. The importance of language in international knowledge transfer[J]. Management International Review, 2008, 48(3): 339-360.
74 Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations[M]. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2001.
75 Miller J G. Bringing culture to basic psychological theory—beyond individualism and collectivism: comment on Oysermanet al. (2002)[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2002, 128(1): 97-109.
76 Schubert T, Sooryamoorthy R. Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(1): 181-203.
77 Wallerstein I. World-systems analysis: an introduction[M]. Durham: Duke University Press, 2020.
78 Wagner C S, Brahmakulam I, Jackson B, et al. Science and technology collaboration: building capability in developing countries?[R]. Santa Monica: RAND Science and Technology, 2001.
79 Miquel J F, Okubo Y. Structure of international collaboration in science-part II: comparisons of profiles in countries using a link indicator[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, 29(2): 271-297.
80 Wagner C S, Whetsell T, Baas J, et al. Openness and impact of leading scientific countries[J]. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2018, 3: Article No.10.
81 Klavans R, Boyack K W. Thought leadership: a new indicator for national and institutional comparison[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2): 239-250.
82 Miao L L, Murray D, Jung W S, et al. The latent structure of global scientific development[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2022, 6(9): 1206-1217.
83 Petersen A M. Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(34): E4671-E4680.
84 Granovetter M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380.
85 Acosta M, Coronado D, Ferrándiz E, et al. Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: the role of economic distance[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(1): 63-74.
86 Olechnicka A, Ploszaj A, Celińska-Janowicz D. The geography of scientific collaboration[M]. London: Taylor & Francis, 2019.
87 Worchel S. Culture’s role in conflict and conflict management: some suggestions, many questions[J]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2005, 29(6): 739-757.
88 Hofstede G, Hofstede G J. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind[M]. Rev. and expanded 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
89 Fearon J D. Ethnic and cultural diversity by country[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2003, 8(2): 195-222.
90 Laitin D D. What is a language community?[J]. American Journal of Political Science, 2000, 44(1): 142-155.
91 Gumus E, Celikay F. R&D expenditure and economic growth: new empirical evidence[J]. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2015, 9(3): 205-217.
92 Dweck C S. Motivational processes affecting learning[J]. American Psychologist, 1986, 41(10): 1040-1048.
93 McFadyen M A, Cannella Jr A A. Social capital and knowledge creation: diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(5): 735-746.
94 Skilton P F, Dooley K J. The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35(1): 118-134.
95 Wang J. Knowledge creation in collaboration networks: Effects of tie configuration[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(1): 68-80.
96 West J D, Jacquet J, King M M, et al. The role of gender in scholarly authorship[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e66212.
97 Priem R L, Price K H. Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making[J]. Group & Organization Studies, 1991, 16(2): 206-225.
98 Tjosvold D. Constructive controversy: a key strategy for groups[J]. Personnel, 1986, 63(4): 39-44.
99 Eisenhardt K M, Kahwajy J L, Bourgeois III L J. How management teams can have a good fight[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1997, 75(4): 77-85.
100 Jehn K A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2): 256-282.
101 Ely R J, Thomas D A. Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001, 46(2): 229-273.
102 Stahl G K, Maznevski M L, Voigt A, et al. Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: a meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2010, 41(4): 690-709.
103 Gong Y P, Kim T Y, Lee D R, et al. A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(3): 827-851.
104 Nederveen Pieterse A, van Knippenberg D, van Ginkel W P. Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011, 114(2): 153-164.
105 Russo M. Diversity in goal orientation, team performance, and internal team environment[J]. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 2012, 31(2): 124-143.
106 Coleman J S. Social capital in the creation of human capital[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94: S95-S120.
107 Zeng A, Fan Y, Di Z R, et al. Fresh teams are associated with original and multidisciplinary research[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2021, 5(10): 1314-1322. 责任编辑冯家琪）