1. Department of Information Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094; 2. WISE Lab, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024; 3. School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington 47408; 4. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Safety Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094; 5. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Service (Nanjing University), Nanjing 210093
[1] 杨蕙馨, 王军. 让创新驱动发展行稳致远[J]. 人民日报, 2018. [2] Goorha S, Ungar L. Discovery of Significant Emerging Trends[C]// Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM Press, 2010: 57-64. [3] Tu Y N, Seng J L. Indices of novelty for emerging topic detection[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2012, 48(2): 303-325. [4] Chen C M. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377. [5] Hansmann T, Niemeyer P. Big Data - Characterizing an Emerging Research Field Using Topic Models[C]// 2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technologies. IEEE, 2014, 1: 43-51. [6] Weismayer C, Pezenka I. Identifying emerging research fields: a longitudinal latent semantic keyword analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(3): 1757-1785. [7] Jarić I, Knezevic-Jaric J, Lenhardt M. Relative age of references as a tool to identify emerging research fields with an application to the field of ecology and environmental sciences[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(2): 519-529. [8] An L, Lin X, Yu C, et al. Measuring and visualizing the contributions of Chinese and American LIS research institutions to emerging themes and salient themes[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3): 1605-1634. [9] Wang Q I. A bibliometric model for identifying emerging research topics[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(2): 290-304. [10] Small H, Boyack K W, Klavans R. Identifying emerging topics in science and technology[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(8): 1450-1467. [11] Boyack K W, Klavans R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(12): 2389-2404. [12] Glänzel W, Thijs B. Using “core documents”for detecting and labelling new emerging topics[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 399-416. [13] Rotolo D, Hicks D, Martin B R. What is an emerging technology?[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(10): 1827-1843. [14] Fagerberg J, Verspagen B. Innovation studies–The emerging structure of a new scientific field[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(2): 218-233. [15] González-Alcaide G, Llorente P, Ramos J M. Bibliometric indicators to identify emerging research fields: publications on mass gatherings[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 1283-1298. [16] Yan E. Research dynamics: Measuring the continuity and popularity of research topics[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(1): 98-110. [17] Dotsika F, Watkins A. Identifying potentially disruptive trends by means of keyword network analysis[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 119: 114-127. [18] Goldstein J. Emergence as a construct: History and issues[J]. Emergence, 1999, 1(1): 49-72. [19] Ryan A J. Emergence is coupled to scope, not level[J]. Complexity, 2007, 13(2): 67-77. [20] Schultz L I, Joutz F L. Methods for identifying emerging General Purpose Technologies: a case study of nanotechnologies[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(1): 155-170. [21] Meyer M, Persson O. Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application[J]. Scientometrics, 1998, 42(2): 195-205. [22] Anegon F D, Contreras E J, Corrochano M D. Research fronts in library and information science in Spain (1985–1994)[J]. Scientometrics, 1998, 42(2): 229-246. [23] Astrom F. Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(7): 947-957. [24] Toivanen H. The shift from theory to innovation: the evolution of Brazilian research frontiers 2005–2011[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2014, 26(1): 105-119. [25] Morris M, Herrmann O J. Beyond surveys: The research frontier moves to the use of administrative data to evaluate R&D grants[J]. Research Evaluation, 2013, 22(5): 298-306. [26] Price D J D S. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science, 1965, 149(3683): 510-515. [27] Upham S P, Small H. Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(1): 15-38. [28] Small H G. A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research[J]. Social studies of science, 1977, 7(2): 139-166. [29] Morris S A, Yen G, Wu Z, et al. Time line visualization of research fronts[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(5): 413-422. [30] Garfield E. Scientography: Mapping the tracks of science[J]. Current Contents: Social & Behavioural Sciences, 1994, 7(45): 5-10. [31] Huang M H, Chen S H, Lin C Y, et al. Exploring temporal relationships between scientific and technical fronts: a case of biotechnology field[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2): 1085-1100. [32] Larsen K. Knowledge network hubs and measures of research impact, science structure, and publication output in nanostructured solar cell research[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 74(1): 123-142. [33] Huang M H, Chang C P. A comparative study on three citation windows for detecting research fronts[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(3): 1835-1853. [34] Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Takeda Y, et al. Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(11): 758-775. [35] Liu C, Gui Q. Mapping intellectual structures and dynamics of transport geography research: a scientometric overview from 1982 to 2014[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(1): 159-184. [36] Small H, Griffith B C. The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties[J]. Science Studies, 1974, 4(1): 17-40. [37] Ma V C, Liu J S. Exploring the research fronts and main paths of literature: a case study of shareholder activism research[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(1): 33-52. [38] Li M. An exploration to visualise the emerging trends of technology foresight based on an improved technique of co-word analysis and relevant literature data of WoS[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2017, 29(6): 655-671. [39] Chen C, Dubin R, Kim M C. Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000–2014)[J]. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 2014, 14(9): 1295-1317. [40] Huang M H, Chang C P. Detecting research fronts in OLED field using bibliographic coupling with sliding window[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(3): 1721-1744. [41] Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Takeda Y, et al. Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(3): 571-580. [42] Liu X, Jiang T, Ma F. Collective dynamics in knowledge networks: Emerging trends analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(2): 425-438. [43] Wagner C S, Leydesdorff L. Seismology as a dynamic, distributed area of scientific research[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(1): 91-114. [44] Jensen S, Liu X, Yu Y, et al. Generation of topic evolution trees from heterogeneous bibliographic networks[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(2): 606-621. [45] Tseng Y H, Lin Y I, Lee Y Y, et al. A comparison of methods for detecting hot topics[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(1): 73-90. [46] Chen K, Guan J. A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(2): 233-247. [47] Aris A, Shneiderman B, Qazvinian V, et al. Visual overviews for discovering key papers and influences across research fronts[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(11): 2219-2228. [48] Natale F, Fiore G, Hofherr J. Mapping the research on aquaculture. A bibliometric analysis of aquaculture literature[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 90(3): 983-999. [49] Milman B, Gavrilova Y. Analysis of citation and cocitation in chemical-engineering[J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 27(1): 53-74. [50] Batagelj V, Ferligoj A, Squazzoni F. The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(1): 503-532. [51] Shapira P, Kwon S, Youtie J. Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(3): 1439-1469. [52] Nederhof A J, Vanwijk E. Mapping the social and behavioral sciences world-wide: Use of maps in portfolio analysis of national research efforts[J]. Scientometrics, 1997, 40(2): 237-276. [53] 陈仕吉. 科学研究前沿探测方法综述[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2009(9): 28-33. [54] 许晓阳, 郑彦宁, 赵筱媛, 等. 研究前沿识别方法的研究进展[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(6): 139-144. [55] Liu Z, Yin Y, Liu W, et al. Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(1): 135-158. [56] Robinson D K R, Ruivenkamp M, Rip A. Tracking the evolution of new and emerging S&T via statement-linkages: Vision assessment in molecular machines[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 70(3): 831-858. [57] Mörchen F, Dejori M, Fradkin D, et al. Anticipating annotations and emerging trends in biomedical literature[C]// Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM Press, 2008: 954-962. [58] Yan E. Research dynamics, impact, and dissemination: A topic-level analysis[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(11): 2357-2372. [59] Kleinberg J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams[J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2003, 7(4): 373-397. [60] Guo H, Weingart S, Börner K. Mixed-indicators model for identifying emerging research areas[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(1): 421-435. [61] Li M, Chu Y. Explore the research front of a specific research theme based on a novel technique of enhanced co-word analysis[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2017, 43(6): 725-741. [62] Swar B, Khan G F. Mapping ICT knowledge infrastructure in South Asia[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 99(1): 117-137. [63] Li X, Qiao H, Wang S. Exploring evolution and emerging trends in business model study: a co-citation analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(2): 869-887. [64] Zitt M, Bassecoulard E. Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 1994, 30(1): 333-351. [65] Schwechheimer H, Winterhager M. Mapping interdisciplinary research fronts in neuroscience: A bibliometric view to retrograde amnesia[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(1): 311-318. [66] Schwechheimer H, Winterhager M. Highly dynamic specialities in climate research[J]. Scientometrics, 1999, 44(3): 547-560. [67] Kontostathis A, De I, Holzman L E, et al. Use of term clusters for emerging trend detection[J]. Preprint, 2004. [68] 郑彦宁, 许晓阳, 刘志辉. 基于关键词共现的研究前沿识别方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(4): 85-92. [69] 潘玮, 牟冬梅, 李茵, 等. 关键词共现方法识别领域研究热点过程中的数据清洗方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(7): 111-117. [70] 许晓阳, 郑彦宁, 刘志辉. 论文和专利相结合的研究前沿识别方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(24): 97-106. [71] An X Y, Wu Q Q. Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1): 133-144. [72] Hu C P, Hu J M, Deng S L, et al. A co-word analysis of library and information science in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 97(2): 369-382. [73] Zhao D, Strotmann A. The knowledge base and research front of information science 2006–2010: An author cocitation and bibliographic coupling analysis[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(5): 995-1006. [74] Zhao D, Strotmann A. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(13): 2070-2086. [75] Ma R. Author bibliographic coupling analysis: A test based on a Chinese academic database[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6(4): 532-542. [76] Persson O. The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994, 45(1): 31-38. [77] Bettencourt L M A, Kaiser D I, Kaur J. Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2009, 3(3): 210-221. [78] Vladutz G, Cook J. Bibliographic coupling and subject relatedness[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 1984, 21: 204-207. [79] Jarneving B. Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1(4): 287-307. [80] Bonaccorsi A, Thoma G. Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(6): 813-831. [81] Mund C, Neuhaeusler P. Towards an early-stage identification of emerging topics in science–The usability of bibliometric characteristics[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(4): 1018-1033. [82] Roche I, Besagni D, Francois C, et al. Identification and characterisation of technological topics in the field of Molecular Biology[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3): 663-676. [83] Schiebel E, Hörlesberger M, Roche I, et al. An advanced diffusion model to identify emergent research issues: the case of optoelectronic devices[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(3): 765-781. [84] Ohniwa R L, Hibino A, Takeyasu K. Trends in research foci in life science fields over the last 30 years monitored by emerging topics[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(1): 111-127. [85] Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1997, 5(1): 19-50. [86] Goldman A W. Conceptualizing the interdisciplinary diffusion and evolution of emerging fields: The case of systems biology[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(1): 43-58. [87] Bettencourt L M A, Kaiser D I, Kaur J, et al. Population modeling of the emergence and development of scientific fields[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(3): 495-518. [88] Comins J A, Leydesdorff L. RPYS i/o: software demonstration of a web-based tool for the historiography and visualization of citation classics, sleeping beauties and research fronts[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3): 1509-1517. [89] Lucio-Arias D, Leydesdorff L. An indicator of research front activity: Measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(12): 2488-2498. [90] Lee W H. How to identify emerging research fields using scientometrics: An example in the field of Information Security[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 76(3): 503-525. [91] 张丽华, 曲建升. 期刊编委比非编委论文作者能更早探测出研究前沿吗[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(8): 113-119. [92] Kim M C, Chen C. A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(1): 239-263. [93] Takeda Y, Kajikawa Y. Optics: a bibliometric approach to detect emerging research domains and intellectual bases[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(3): 543-558. [94] Chang Y W, Huang M H, Lin C W. Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3): 2071-2087. [95] Rohrbeck R, Battistella C, Huizingh E. Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, 101: 1-9. [96] Laurens P, Zitt M, Bassecoulard E. Delineation of the genomics field by hybrid citation-lexical methods: interaction with experts and validation process[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3): 647-662. [97] 付鑫金, 方曙, 庞弘燊. 基于共词分析的我国情报学博硕士学位论文研究热点分析[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(11): 1722-1725. [98] 魏群义, 侯桂楠, 霍然. 近 10 年国内情报学硕士学位论文研究热点统计分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(2): 35-81. [99] Freyne J, Coyle L, Smyth B, et al. Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2010, 53(11): 124-132. [100] Zhao D, Strotmann A. Can citation analysis of Web publications better detect research fronts?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(9): 1285-1302. [101] Glassey O. Exploring the weak signals of starts-ups as a folksonomic system[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2009, 21(3): 321-332. [102] 王效岳, 刘自强, 白如江, 等. 基于基金项目数据的研究前沿主题探测方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(13): 87-98. [103] Lu C, Ding Y, Zhang C. Understanding the impact change of a highly cited article: a content-based citation analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(2): 927-945. [104] Huang M, Chang C P. A comparative study on detecting research fronts in the organic light-emitting diode (OLED) field using bibliographic coupling and co-citation[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(3): 2041-2057. [105] Miguel S, Moya-Anegon F, Herrero-Solana V. New approach to institutional domain analysis: Multilevel research fronts structure[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 74(3): 331-344. [106] Kuhn T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963: 2. [107] Kreuchauff F, Korzinov V. A patent search strategy based on machine learning for the emerging field of service robotics[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(2): 743-772. [108] Wang X, Cheng Q, Lu W. Analyzing evolution of research topics with NEViewer: a new method based on dynamic co-word networks[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1253-1271.
