|
|
|
| Evaluation of Academic Papers Impact Based on Scientific Communication Path: A Case Study of Chinese International Academic Papers in Social Sciences |
| Guo Fengjiao1, Zhao Rongying2, Sun Shaomin1 |
1.Science and Technology Information Research Institute, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049
2.School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the scientific communication path of academic papers, the academic papers impact is divided into native impact, offline impact, Web 1.0 impact, and Web 2.0 impact, and the generation processes of various types of impact are discussed. An evaluation model of the academic papers impact is constructed, and two sets of data (including a control group) obtained from the Chinese international academic papers in social sciences are empirically studied. This study has obtained the following research results andfirstly, the score of the academic papers impact demonstrates the highest correlation with relative impact factor and citation frequency. Secondly, the impact score of data group 1 is still lower than that of the overall control group, and the trend line of the academic papers impact score in both groups shows a right-leaning trend. Thirdly, the impact score of the 50 research institutes with the highest total score of academic papers decreases exponentially, and universities are the backbone of international social science research in China. Lastly, among the 79 subjects covered by the two data groups, the average score of data group 1 with 24 subjects is higher than that of the control group, and the subjects covered by academic papers are classified according to their relative influence.
|
|
Received: 10 April 2019
|
|
|
|
1 沈利华, 缪家鼎, 陈国钢, 等. “客观同行评议”方法探索性研 究——一种基于引文分析法的学术论文影响力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(18): 144-148.
2 GarfieldE. Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas[J]. Science, 1955, 122(3159): 108-111.
3 王贤文, 方志超, 王虹茵. 连续、动态和复合的单篇论文评价体系构建研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(8): 37-48.
4 刘春丽. 论文层面计量学(Article-Level Metrics): 发展过程、特点、指标与应用[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2016, 35(2): 63-69, 110.
5 SchubertA. Using the h-index for assessing single publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(3): 559-565.
6 刘运梅, 李长玲, 冯志刚, 等. 改进的p指数测度单篇论文学术质量的探讨[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(21): 106-113.
7 索传军, 盖双双. 基于引文的论文质量与影响力探析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(5): 11-15.
8 赵蓉英, 魏绪秋. 引证视角下的国内学术论文影响力评价——以CNKI中国引文数据库为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(8): 55-60.
9 韩毅, 夏慧, 童迎. 引用结构视角下单篇学术文献影响力测度的ID指数[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(9): 968-975.
10 段庆锋, 朱东华. 基于合著与引文混合网络的协同评价方法[J]. 情报学报, 2012, 31(2): 189-195.
11 MoedH F. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation[J]. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 2009, 57(1): 13-18.
12 ShaoW. Innovative university management: Dynamic model design of the evaluation system of academic papers’ influence[C]// Proceedings of the International Conference on Education Science and Management Engineering, Beijing, 2011: 100-103.
13 刘春丽. Altmetrics指标在科研评价与管理方面的应用——争议、评论和评估[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(6): 13-22.
14 HammarfeltB. Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1419-1430.
15 CroninB, SugimotoC R. Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2014.
16 ErdtM, NagarajanA, SinS C J, et al. Altmetrics: An analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 1117-1166.
17 HassanS U, GillaniU A. Altmetrics of “altmetrics” using Google Scholar, Twitter, Mendeley, Facebook, Google-plus, CiteULike, Blogs and Wiki[OL]. [2018-11-08]. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1603/1603.07992.pdf.
18 杨帅, 潘云涛, 王海燕, 等. 引用次数、相对影响力和社会网络在论文评价中的应用[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2016, 25(7): 1-9.
19 彭秋茹, 阎素兰, 杨波, 等. 融合引文与Altmetrics的报纸论文影响力综合评价方法研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2018(5): 17-27, 34.
20 程菲. 科技论文影响力综合评价研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2016.
21 新华字典. 影响[EB/OL]. [2018-11-22]. http://zd.eywedu.com/zi.asp?id=5766.
22 丁洁兰. 科研人员学术影响力二维测度研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院文献情报中心, 2011.
23 A. H. 米哈依洛夫等. 科学交流与情报学[M]. 徐新民, 等译. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 1980: 47-50.
24 邱均平, 马瑞敏, 程妮. 利用SCI进行科研工作者成果评价的新探索[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2007, 33(4): 11-16.
25 叶继元, 朱强. 论文评价与期刊评价——兼及核心期刊的概 念[J]. 学术界, 2001(3): 63-71.
26 赵蓉英, 郭凤娇, 谭洁. 基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(1): 96-108.
27 FattiL. Decision making for leaders: The analytical hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1989, 42(1): 107-109.
28 邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7): 93-100.
29 常建娥, 蒋太立. 层次分析法确定权重的研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2007, 29(1): 153-156.
30 刘莉. 改革开放三十年我国大陆SSCI论文定量研究——兼论社会科学研究国际化[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2009.
31 余莉.SSCI收录我国社会科学文献的基本状况研究[D]. 长春：吉林大学, 2013.
32 马云彤. 相对影响因子在高校学报评价中的应用——以《西安文理学院学报》(自然科学版)为分析对象[J]. 西安文理学院学报(社会科学版), 2009, 12(6): 63-66. |
|
|
|
