摘要期刊出版的数字化加速了学术交流过程,改变了学术交流模式。作为出版数字化的产物,usage数据为科学计量学的研究与应用提供了新的方向,已有研究探讨了使用数据预测、补充、代替引文评价指标的可能性。为进一步明确usage指标测度的实质及其用于科研评价的可行性和适用条件,本研究以LIS领域为例,采用Web of Science数据库提供的usage count和被引频次作为数据源,分析论文使用和被引的相关关系以及论文质量、文献类型及子学科对两者关系的调节作用。结果表明：①就科学传播而言,作为广义科学传播系统的产物——使用数据与引文数据间呈互补关系;将二者作为独立的单元来看,由于强相关性,其又呈可替代关系;②就科研评价而言,本文尚不能证实使用数据对引文指标的替代作用。
谢娟, 龚凯乐, 成颖, 柯青. 使用数据与引用数据间的补充或替代关系探讨[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(5): 486-494.
Xie Juan, Gong Kaile, Cheng Ying, Ke Qing. Alternative or Complementary Relationship between Usage Data and Citation Data. 情报学报, 2018, 37(5): 486-494.
[1] Brown C.Communication in the sciences[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2010, 44(1): 285-316. [2] Garfield E.Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities[M]. New York: Wiley, 1979. [3] Borgman C, Furner J.Scholarly communication and bibliometrics[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2002, 36(1): 2-72. [4] Mcdonald J D.Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(1): 39-50. [5] Kurtz M J, Bollen J.Usage bibliometrics[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2010, 44(1): 1-64. [6] Moed H F, Halevi G.Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(10): 1988-2002. [7] Bollen J, Sompel H V.Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(1): 136-149. [8] Wan J K, Hua P H, Rousseau R, et al.The journal download immediacy index (DII): experiences using a Chinese full-text database[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3): 555-566. [9] Rowlands I, Nicholas D.The missing link: journal usage metrics[J]. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 2007, 59(3): 222-228. [10] De Sordi J O, Conejero M A, Meireles M. Bibliometric indicators in the context of regional repositories: proposing the D-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(1): 235-258. [11] Bornmann L, Marx W.Standards for the application of bibliometrics in the evaluation of individual researchers working in the natural sciences[J]. Zeitschrift Fu?r Evaluation, 2013, 12(1): 103-127. [12] Brody T, Harnad S, Carr L.Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(8): 1060-1072. [13] Botting N, Dipper L, Hilari K.The effect of social media promotion on academic article uptake[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(3): 795-800. [14] Sharma H P.Download plus citation counts—A useful indicator to measure research impact[J]. Current Science, 2007, 92(7): 873. [15] Schloegl C, Gorraiz J.Global usage versus global citation metrics: The case of pharmacology journals[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(1): 161-170. [16] Scales P A.Citation analyses asindicators of the use of serials: a comparison of ranked title lists produced by citation counting and from use data[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1976, 32(1): 17-25. [17] Tsay M Y.The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use[J]. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 1998, 86(1): 31-39. [18] Schlögl C, Gorraiz J, Gumpenberger C, et al.Comparison of downloads, citations and readership data for two information systems journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1113-1128. [19] Moed H F.Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005, 56(10): 1088-1097. [20] Kurtz M J, Henneken E A.Measuring metrics—a 40-year longitudinal cross-validation of citations, downloads, and peer review in astrophysics[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(3): 695-708. [21] Boukacem-Zeghmouri C, Bador P, Lafouge T, et al.Relationships between consumption, publication and impact in French universities in a value perspective: a bibliometric analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(1): 263-280. [22] Perneger T V.Relation between online “Hit Counts” and subsequent citations: Prospective study of research papers in the BM[J][J]. British Medical Journal, 2004, 329: 546. [23] Darmoni S J, Roussel F, Benichou J, et al.Reading factor: a new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries[J]. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2002, 90(3): 323-327. [24] Kurtz M J, Eichhorn G, Accomazzi A, et al.The bibliometric properties of article readership information: Research articles[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005, 56(2): 111-128. [25] Gorraiz J, Gumpenberger C, Schlögl C.Usage versus citation behaviours in four subject areas[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1077-1095. [26] Schloegl C, Gorraiz J.Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3): 567-580. [27] 赵星. 学术文献用量级数据Usage的测度特性研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(3): 44-57. [28] Kakushadze Z.An index for SSRN downloads[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(1): 9-28. [29] Thelwall M, Kousha K.ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(2): 468-479. [30] Macduff C.An evaluation of the process and initial impact of disseminating a nursing e-thesis[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2009, 65(5): 1010-1018. [31] Shepherd P T.The feasibility of developing and implementing journal usage factors: a research project sponsored by UKSG[J]. Serials, 2007, 20(2): 117-123. [32] Baker G, Read E J.Vendor-supplied usage data for electronic resources: a survey of academic libraries[J]. Learned Publishing, 2008, 21: 48-57. [33] Bollen J, De Sompel H V. An architecture for the aggregation and analysis of scholarly usage data[C]// Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2006: 298-307. [34] Wang X W, Fang Z C, Sun X L.Usage patterns of scholarly articles on Web of Science: a study on Web of Science usage count[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 917-926. [35] Chi P S, Glänzel W.An empirical investigation of the associations among usage, scientific collaboration and citation impact[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(1): 403-412. [36] 谢娟, 龚凯乐, 成颖, 等. 论文下载量与被引量相关关系的元分析[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(12): 1255-1269. [37] Jung Y, Kim J, Kim H.STM e-journal use analysis by utilizing KESLI usage statistics consolidation platform[J]. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2013, 7(2): 205-215. [38] Duy J, Vaughan L.Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2006, 32(5): 512-517. [39] Buckarma E H, Thiels C A, Gas B L, et al.Influence of social media on the dissemination of a traditional surgical research article[J]. Journal of Surgical Education, 2017, 74(1): 79-83. [40] 米哈依洛夫А.И. 科学交流与情报学[M]. 徐新民, 译. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 1980. [41] 曹艺, 王曰芬, 丁洁. 面向学术影响力评价的科技文献引用与下载的相关性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(8): 56-64. [42] Bollen J, De Sompel H V, Smith J A, et al. Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2005, 41(6): 1419-1440. [43] 倪延年. 知识传播学[M]. 南京: 南京师范大学出版社, 1999. [44] Nicholas D, Huntington P, Dobrowolski T, et al.Revisiting ‘obsolescence’ and journal article ‘decay’ through usage data: an analysis of digital journal use by year of publication[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2005, 41(6): 1441-1461. [45] Cohen J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences[M]. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988. [46] Ketcham C M.The proper use of citation data in journal management[J]. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 2008, 56(6): 357-362. [47] Subotic S, Mukherjee B.Short and amusing: The relationship between title characteristics, downloads, and citations in psychology articles[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2014, 40(1): 115-124. [48] Nieder C, Dalhaug A, Aandahl G.Correlation between article download and citation figures for highly accessed articles from five open access oncology journals[J]. SpringerPlus, 2013, 2(1): 261. [49] Bornmann L.Scientific Peer Review[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2011, 45(1): 197-245. [50] Wallmark J T, Sedig K G. Quality of research measured by citation method and by peer review—A comparison[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1986, EM-33(4): 218-222. [51] Derrick G E, Haynes A, Chapman S, et al.The association between Four Citation Metrics and Peer Rankings of Research Influence of Australian Researchers in six fields of public health[J]. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(4): e18521. [52] Anderson R C, Narin F, Mcallister P.Publication ratings versus peer ratings of universities[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1978, 29(2): 91-103. [53] Mryglod O, Kenna R, Holovatch Y, et al.Absolute and specific measures of research group excellence[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(1): 115-127. [54] Vaughan L, Tang J, Yang R B.Investigating disciplinary differences in the relationships between citations and downloads[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(3): 1533-1545. [55] Tahamtan I, Afshar A S, Ahamdzadeh K.Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3): 1195-1225.
