Distribution Features of Facebook Altmetrics of Scholarly Outputs
Yu Houqiang1,2, Zhang Wei2, Cao Xueting2
1.School of Information Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006 2.School of Economics & Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094
1 余厚强, 王曰芬, 王菲菲, 等. 科学推文作者行为模式与地理分布研究[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(2): 140-150. 2 Shu F, Lou W, Haustein S. Can Twitter increase the visibility of Chinese publications?[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(1): 505-519. 3 Maflahi N, Thelwall M. How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of Mendeley reader counts for new articles[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(1): 158-167. 4 刘晓娟, 周建华, 尤斌. 基于Mendeley与WoS的选择性计量指标与传统科学计量指标相关性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(3): 112-118. 5 宋丽萍, 王建芳, 王树义. 科学评价视角下F1000、Mendeley与传统文献计量指标的比较[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(4): 48-54. 6 Bornmann L. Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(4): 1036-1047. 7 Siravuri H V, Alhoori H. What makes a research article newsworthy?[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 54(1): 802-803. 8 王菲菲, 贾晨冉, 韩文菲, 等. 政策文件替代计量视角下的学术成果利用效率分布态势剖析[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(4): 55-66. 9 Shema H, Bar-Ilan J, Thelwall M. How is research blogged? A content analysis approach[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(6): 1136-1149. 10 Kousha K, Thelwall M. An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(12): 2993-3007. 11 赵蓉英, 魏明坤, 汪少震. 基于Altmetrics的开源软件学术影响力评价研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(2): 80-95. 12 Bik H M, Goldstein M C. An introduction to social media for scientists[J]. PLoS Biology, 2013, 11(4): e1001535. 13 Bedrick S D, Sittig D F. A scientific collaboration tool built on the Facebook platform[J]. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2008, 2008: 41-45. 14 Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, et al. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e64841. 15 Néda Z, Varga L, Biró T S. Science and Facebook: the same popularity law![J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(7): e0179656. 16 Na J C, Ye Y E. Content analysis of scholarly discussions of psychological academic articles on Facebook[J]. Online Information Review, 2017, 41(3): 337-353. 17 Mohammadi E, Barahmand N, Thelwall M. Who shares health and medical scholarly articles on Facebook[J]. Learned Publishing, 2020, 33(2): 111-118. 18 Enkhbayar A, Alperin J P. Challenges of capturing engagement on Facebook for Altmetrics[C]// Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Centre for Science and Technology Studies, 2018: 1460-1469. 19 Rousseau R. The Australian and New Zealand fields of research (FoR) codes[J]. ISSI Newsletter, 2018, 14(3): 59-61. 20 Yu H Q. Context of altmetrics data matters: an investigation of count type and user category[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(1): 267-283. 21 Yu H Q, Xu S M, Xiao T T, et al. Global science discussed in local altmetrics: Weibo and its comparison with Twitter[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11(2): 466-482. 22 余厚强, 曹雪婷, 王曰芬. 新闻替代计量指标的分布特征研究[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(10): 1081-1092. 23 余厚强, 肖婷婷, 王曰芬, 等. 政策文件替代计量指标分布特征研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(5): 57-69. 24 余厚强, HemmingerBradley M., 肖婷婷, 等. 新浪微博替代计量指标特征分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(4): 20-36. 25 Enkhbayar A, Haustein S, Barata G, et al. How much research shared on Facebook is hidden from public view? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers[OL]. (2019-09-03). https://arxiv.org/vc/arxiv/papers/1909/1909.01476v1. pdf. 26 Fang Z C, Costas R. Studying the accumulation velocity of altmetric data tracked by Altmetric.com[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 123(2): 1077-1101.
