|
|
|
| Paradigm Shift and Theory Evolution of Information Science (1987-2017) |
| Wang Lin |
| School of Management, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Research on the theoretical foundations of information science has experienced great changes with respect to the new information infrastructure. This paper reviews the paradigm shifts and theory evolution of information science during 1987-2017. A systematic discussion of the physical paradigm, cognitive paradigm, and domain analytic paradigm of information science is presented. This work points out that the mainstream theory of information science has evolved through the stages of document theory, information management theory, and knowledge theory. Further, an exploration of whether data science can become the next stage of mainstream theory is presented.
|
|
Received: 16 January 2018
|
|
|
|
[1] 王琳. 情报学基础理论研究30年(1987—2017)的回顾与思考[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(5): 543-560.
[2] Ellis D.The physical and cognitive paradigms in information retrieval research[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1992, 48(3): 328-331.
[3] Miksa F L.Library and information science: Two paradigms[C]// Vakkari P, Cronin B.(eds) Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Historical, Empirical and Theoretical Perspective. London: Taylor Graham, 1992: 229-252.
[4] 邹永利, 细野公男. 情报学研究的认知观点[M]// 张力治. 情报学进展(第三卷). 北京: 航空工业出版社, 1999: 53-77.
[5] Ingwersen P.Information and information science in context[M]// Olaisen J, Erland M P, Wilson P. (eds) Information Science: From the Development of the Discipline to Social Interaction. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1996: 69-112.
[6] Dick A L.Restoring knowledge as a theoretical focus of library and information science[J]. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, 1995, 63(3): 99-106.
[7] Ellis D.Domain, approach and paradigm in information retrieval research[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1992, 48(3): 328-331.
[8] Shera J H.Librarianship and information science[M]// Machlup F, Mansfield V.(eds.) The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1983: 379-338.
[9] 邹永利. 情报学研究的认知观点与情报系统设计[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 1998.
[10] Belkin N J.The problem of ‘matching’ in information retrieval[M]// Harbo O, Kajberg L.(eds.) Theory and Application of Information Research. London: Mansell, 1980: 187-197.
[11] 王非. 信息检索过程的认知分析[C]// 武汉大学. 2004全国博士生学术论坛会议论文集(图情档分论坛), 武汉, 2004: 68-72.
[12] Belkin N J, Oddy R N, Brooks H M.ASK for information retrieval (I)[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1982, 38(2): 61-71.
[13] 汪冰, 孟广均,霍国庆. 关于情报科学若干基本问题的探讨(二)[J]. 图书情报工作, 1998, 42(7): 1-7.
[14] Ellis D.The dilemma of measurement in information retrieval research[J]. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 1996, 47(1): 23-36.
[15] Dervin B, Nilan M.Information needs and uses[M]// Williams M E.(Ed. ). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. White Plains: Knowledge Industry Publications, 1986, 21: 3-33.
[16] 王琳. 意义建构论——信息科学认知范式的代表性理论[J]. 情报科学, 2015, 32(11): 14-22.
[17] 赖鼎铭. 资讯研究的典范变迁[J]. 图书情报工作, 1997, 41(5): 2-11.
[18] Savolainen R.Information use as gap-bridging: the viewpoint of Sense-Making Methodology[J]. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(8): 1116-1125.
[19] Dervin B, Frenette M.Sense-making methodology: Communicating communicatively with campaign audiences[M]// Dervin B. Sense-Making Methodology Reader: Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill: Hampton Press, 2003: 233-249.
[20] Case D O.Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior[M]. 3rd edition. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012.
[21] Lancaster F W. Survival is not mandatory[EB/OL]. [2016-10-01]. http://www.ztxb.net.cn.
[22] Ingwersen P.Information science as a cognitive science[M]// Best H. et al.(eds. ) Informations- und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften, Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen, 1994: 23-56.
[23] Ingwersen P.Information Retrieval Interaction[M]. London: Taylor Graham, 1992.
[24] Ingwersen P, Järvelin K.The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context[M]. Springer, 2005.
[25] 张金柱. 情报学的学科结构及其演化分析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2011, 32(3): 34-37.
[26] Ingwersen P.Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1996, 52(1): 3-50.
[27] 赖茂生, 王琳. 情报检索发展路径的转向——评丹麦情报学家英格沃森的新著[J]. 情报学报, 2006, 25(6): 755-760.
[28] Ingwersen P.Information and information science in context[J]. Libri, 1992, 42(2): 99-135.
[29] Ingwersen P.Integrative framework for information seeking and interactive information retrieval[M]// Fisher K E, Erdelez S, Mckechnie L.(Eds. ) Theories of Information Behavior. Medford: Information Today, 2005: 215-220.
[30] 卢太宏. 情报科学发展中的四个里程碑[J]. 情报学报, 1990, 9(5): 394-400.
[31] 赖茂生. 如何认知和发展信息资源管理学科[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2011, 1(1): 12-15.
[32] 赖茂生. 情报学教育的现状和发展[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2003, 26(1): 80-84, 88.
[33] Marchand D A, Horton F W.Infortrends: Profiting from your information resources[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
[34] 马费成, 赖茂生. 信息资源管理[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
[35] Hjørland B.Information seeking and subject representation: An activity-theoretical approach to information science[M]. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1997.
[36] Hjørland B.Epistemology and the social-cognitive perspective in information science[J]. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53(4): 257-270.
[37] Hjørland B, Albrechtsen H.Towards a new horizon in information science:Domain analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1995, 46(6): 400-425.
[38] Hjørland B.Domain analysis in information science[M]// Bates M J, Maack M N. (Eds) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3nd ed). Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009: 1648-1654.
[39] Bawden D, Robinson L.Introduction to information science[M]. London: Facet Publishing, 2012.
[40] Hjøland B.Domain analysis: A socio-cognitive orientation for information science research[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2004, 30(3): 17-21.
[41] 王琳. 领域分析:北欧情报学研究的代表性学说[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(18): 24-27.
[42] Hjørland B.Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches-traditional as well as innovative[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2002, 58(4): 422-462.
[43] Søndergaard T F, Andersen J, Hjørland B.Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information: Revising and updating the UNISIST model[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2004, 59(23):278-320.
[44] Albrechtsen H.This is not domain analysis[J]. Knowledge Organization, 2015, 42(8): 557-561.
[45] Hartel J.The serious leisure frontier in library and information science: Hobby domains[J]. Knowledge Organization, 2003, 30(3-4): 228-238.
[46] Ford N.New cognitive directions[M]// Spink A, Cole C. New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval. Springer, 2005: 81-96.
[47] 曾民族. 知识服务研究现状与关键领域[M]// 王忠军. 情报学进展(第六卷). 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2006: 119-148.
[48] 张晓林. 从数字图书馆到E-Knowledge机制[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2005, 31(4): 5-10.
[49] Ronald L, Wactlar H D. Knowledge lost in information: Report of the NSF workshop on research directions for digital libraries[EB/OL]. [2018-02-05]. http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ news/2004/knowledge_lost_report200405. pdf.
[50] 王琳. 情报学知识思想的历史回顾与思考[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(4): 340-353.
[51] Buckland M K. Classification, links, and contexts: Making sense and using logic[EB/OL]. [2016-10-01]. http://people.ischool. berkeley.edu/~buckland/lisbon15.pdf.
[52] Buckland M K.Library services in theory and context[M]. 2nd edition. Pergamon Press, 1988.
[53] Vickery B.Information science-part 1[EB/OL]. [2010-10-01].www.lucis.me_uk/infosci1.htm.
[54] Vickery B.Information science methodology[EB/OL]. [2010-10- 01].www. ucis me_uk/method.htm.
[55] Soergel D.An information science manifesto: American Society for Information Science Award of Merit Acceptance Speech [EB/OL]. [2011-05-12].www.asis.org/bulletin/Dec-97/Soergel. htm.
[56] Saracevic T.Information science[J]. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(12): 1051-1063.
[57] Saracevic T.Information science: origin, evolution and relation[C]// Vakkari P, Cronin B.(eds). Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Historical, Empirical and Theoretical Perspective. London: Taylor Graham, 1992: 5-27.
[58] 梁战平. 情报学若干问题辨析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2003, 26(3): 193-198.
[59] 马费成, 宋恩梅, 张勤. IRM-KM范式与情报学发展研究[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2008.
[60] Wersig G.Information science and theory: A weaver bird’s perspective[C]// Vakkari P, Cronin B.(eds). Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Historical, Empirical and Theoretical Perspective. London: Taylor Graham, 1992: 202-217.
[61] 梁战平, 梁建. 新世纪情报学学科发展趋势探析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2005, 28(3): 225-229.
[62] 毕强. 数字时代情报学发展前景[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(12): 5-7, 31.
[63] Zins C.Classification schemes of information science: Twenty- eight scholars map the field[J]. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(5): 645-672.
[64] 王知津, 陈芳芳. 从情报科学到知识科学[J]. 情报科学, 2007, 25(9): 1281-1286, 1292.
[65] Zins C.Redefining information science: From “information science” to “knowledge science”[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2006, 62(4): 447-461.
[66] 德本斯A. 情报学的主要发展趋势——在’96ISIRSD上所作的学术报告[J]. 图书情报知识, 1996(4): 22-23, 26.
[67] 刘春茂, 王琳. 网络环境下情报学理论体系的创新[J]. 图书情报工作, 2001, 45(1): 15-19.
[68] 叶鹰, 马费成. 数据科学兴起及其与信息科学的关联[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(6): 575-580.
[69] 赖茂生. 知识时代的LIS如何定位和发展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(18): 5-10, 115.
[70] 韩毅, 李红. 大数据语境下情报学的坚守与拓展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(5): 47-52.
[71] 董克, 邱均平. 论大数据环境对情报学发展的影响[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(9): 886-893.
[72] Marchionini G.Information science roles in the emerging field of data science[J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2016, 1(2): 1-6.
[73] Rowley J.The wisdom hierarchy: Representation of the DIKW hierarchy[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2007, 33(2): 163-180.
[74] 钱学森. 关于大成智慧的谈话[M]// 卢明森, 鲍世行. 钱学森论大成智慧. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2014: 307-312.
[75] 苏新宁. 提升图书情报学学科地位的思考——基于CSSCI的实证分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2010, 36(4): 47-53.
[76] 赖茂生. 情报学的发展观[J]. 图书情报知识, 2000(4): 2-4, 9. |
|
|
|
