|
|
|
| Theoretical Framework of Altmetrics |
| Yu Houqiang |
| School of Information Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Altmetrics is a typical data-driven research area. With the wide application of altmetrics services, there is increasing demand of in-depth development of altmetrics data, which strongly requires theoretical guidance and support. Therefore, this study summarizes and proposes a logically rigorous and structurally clear theoretical framework, aiming to boost the in-depth development of altmetrics. The theoretical framework consists of three-level theories, i.e. macro-level scientific paradigm revolution theory, meso-level scientific work computerization theory, and micro-level engagement degree spiral theory. The scientific paradigm revolution theory is based on the concept of Kuhn's scientific paradigm, expounds the primary principle of scientometrics extending to altmetrics, and is the foundation of altmetrics as an independent research area. The scientific work computerization theory reveals the underlying logic of the scientific communication process that diversifies altmetrics data, explains the primary cause of the difference presented in the level of engagement, and reasons the underlying relationship of different types of altmetrics data. This coherent theoretical framework is helpful in understanding and grasping the forming process, basic idea, and application principles of altmetrics holistically. Lastly, the study proposes the advancement of the future altmetrics theory by incorporating relevant theories and developing unique altmetrics theories.
|
|
Received: 24 August 2021
|
|
|
|
1 Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, et al. Altmetrics: a manifesto[EB/OL]. (2010-10-26) [2021-06-28]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
2 Engineering A, Konkiel S, Priem J, et al. The state of altmetrics: a tenth anniversary celebration[OL]. (2020-10-06) [2020-11-20]. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13010000.v2.
3 余厚强, 任全娥, 张洋, 等. Altmetrics的译名分歧: 困扰、影响及其辨析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(1): 47-59.
4 Cronin B, Snyder H W, Rosenbaum H, et al. Invoked on the web[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(14): 1319-1328.
5 NISO. Outputs of the NISO alternative assessment project[OL]. [2016-10-03]. http://www.niso.org/topics/tl/altmetrics_initiative/.
6 Kuhn T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
7 Wray K B. Kuhn's evolutionary social epistemology[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
8 Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L, Mutz R, et al. Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: principles for comparing sets of documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(7): 1370-1381.
9 Gingras Y, Larivière V. There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(1): 226-227.
10 Bornmann L, Haunschild R. Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact?[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 110(2): 937-943.
11 Bornmann L. Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(3): 647-648.
12 Bornmann L. Scientific revolution in scientometrics: the broadening of impact from citation to societal[M]// Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur, 2016: 347-359.
13 Merton R K. The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
14 Singh Chawla D. The unsung heroes of scientific software[J]. Nature, 2016, 529(7584): 115-116.
15 Aljohani N R, Fayoumi A, Hassan S U. Bot prediction on social networks of Twitter in altmetrics using deep graph convolutional networks[J]. Soft Computing, 2020, 24(15): 11109-11120.
16 Bornmann L. Letter to the editor: on the conceptualisation and theorisation of the impact caused by publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(3): 1145-1148.
17 Nigel Gilbert G. Referencing as persuasion[J]. Social Studies of Science, 1977, 7(1): 113-122.
18 Shema H, Bar-Ilan J, Thelwall M. How is research blogged? A content analysis approach[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(6): 1136-1149.
19 Tahamtan I, Bornmann L. Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: match or mismatch? A literature review[J]. El Profesional de la Información, 2020, 29(1): e290102.
20 Elliott M S, Kraemer K L. Computerization movements and technology diffusion: from mainframes to ubiquitous computing[M]. Medford: Information Today, 2008: 3-41.
21 Xu S M. Issues in the interpretation of “altmetrics” digital traces: a review[J]. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2018, 3: Article 29.
22 余厚强. 替代计量指标与引文量相关性的大规模跨学科研究——数值类型、指标种类与用户类别的影响[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(6): 606-617.
23 王贤文. 科学计量大数据及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
24 Priem J. Altmetrics[M]// Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2014: 263-287.
25 Wang X W, Fang Z C, Guo X H. Tracking the digital footprints to scholarly articles from social media[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 1365-1376.
26 Priem J. Beyond the paper[J]. Nature, 2013, 495(7442): 437-440.
27 Nielsen M. Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.
28 Moed H F. Altmetrics as traces of the computerization of the research process[OL]. (2015-10-17) [2020-12-17]. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1510/1510.05131.pdf.
29 Wang X W, Xu S M, Peng L, et al. Exploring scientists' working timetable: do scientists often work overtime?[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6(4): 655-660.
30 Wang X W, Wang Z, Xu S M. Tracing scientist's research trends realtimely[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(2): 717-729.
31 Small H G. Cited documents as concept symbols[J]. Social Studies of Science, 1978, 8(3): 327-340.
32 Holmberg K. Classifying altmetrics by level of impact[C]// Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 2015: 101-102.
33 Lin J, Fenner M. Altmetrics in evolution: defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics[J]. Information Standards Quarterly, 2013, 25(2): 20.
34 Holmberg K. The meaning of altmetrics[C]// Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences, 2014: paper 1.
35 Holmberg K, Bowman T D, Didegah F. The meaning of impact in altmetrics[C/OL]// Proceedings of the 2015 Altmetrics Workshop, Amsterdam, 2015. http://altmetrics.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/altmetrics15_paper_5.pdf.
36 Haustein S, Bowman T D, Costas R. Interpreting ‘altmetrics’: viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories[M]// Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur, 2016: 372-406.
37 邱均平, 余厚强. 基于影响力产生模型的替代计量指标分层研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(5): 53-58.
38 Bourdieu P. The forms of capital (1986)[M]// Cultural Theory: an Anthology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010: 81-93.
39 Davenport T H, Beck J C. The attention economy: understanding the new currency of business[M]. Harvard Business Review Press, 2001.
40 Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life[M]. Anchor, 1959.
41 Enkhbayar A, Haustein S, Barata G, et al. How much research shared on Facebook happens outside of public pages and groups? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers[J]. Quantitative Science Studies, 2020, 1(2): 749-770.
42 刘晓娟, 王晨琳, 韦娱. Altmetrics分析方法体系构建研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(3): 45-52.
43 Bornmann L. What do altmetrics counts Mean? A plea for content analyses[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(4): 1016-1017.
44 Costas R. Towards the social media studies of science: social media metrics, present and future[J]. Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación, 2017, 13(1): 1-5. |
|
|
|
