|
|
Innovation Synergy of a Quadruple-Helix Model Based on Mutual Information |
Xiao Guohua1,2,3, He Defang3,4, Zhang Xian1,2, Xu Haiyun1,2, Han Ye1,2 |
1.Chengdu Documentation and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041 2.Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190 3.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023 4.Ministry of Science and Technology of PRC, Beijing 100862 |
|
|
Abstract This study analyzes the limitations of the triple-helix model of government-industry-research institution and the shortcomings of the existing research on the fourth helix. It introduces the viewpoint that the science and technology (S&T) service organization should be the fourth helix, and thus builds the quadruple-helix model of government-industry-research institution-service organization. Subsequently, an index of Tgias quadruple-helix innovation synergy is designed based on mutual information and the triple-helix algorithm. The output data of scientific and technological papers on each subject are used as its innovation output characterization, and the innovation synergy between and among the quadruple-helix subjects with the index Tgias are quantitatively measured. Quantitative analysis reveals that after the S&T service organization joins the helix structure, the existing synergies of government-industry, government-research institution, industry-research institution, and government-industry-research institution are comprehensively improved, reflecting the catalytic and promoting role of such organization as the fourth helix in the innovation and development of the original triple-helix system. The research and application of the model developed herein is conducive to improving the efficiency of collaborative innovation in S&T intelligence, technology transfer, and other aspects.
|
Received: 13 June 2020
|
|
|
|
1 中共中央、国务院关于构建更加完善的要素市场化配置体制机制的意见[EB/OL]. (2020-03-30) [2020-04-09]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2020/content_5503537.htm. 2 中共中央、国务院关于新时代加快完善社会主义市场经济体制的意见[EB/OL]. (2020-05-11) [2020-05-18]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2020/content_5515273.htm. 3 Leydesdorff L, Etzkowitz H. Is there a fourth helix?[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2003, 30(1): 55-61. 4 亨利·埃茨科威兹. 国家创新模式——大学、产业、政府“三螺旋”创新战略[M]. 周春彦, 译. 北京: 东方出版社, 2006: 236-237. 5 吴卫红, 陈高翔, 张爱美. 基于状态空间模型的政产学研资协同创新四螺旋影响因素实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(14): 22-29. 6 杨敬华, 蒋和平. 农业科技园区创业与创新发展的四螺旋分析[J]. 科技与经济, 2005, 18(2): 38-40. 7 赵立雨, 任静. R&D创新活动中知识共享的四螺旋模型研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(22): 66-69. 8 金潇明. 产业集群知识共享的四螺旋结构模型[J]. 系统工程, 2010, 28(1): 90-94. 9 任怡. 加强“四螺旋”互动提高产学研合作中的知识转移效率[J]. 中国高校科技, 2014(11): 40-41. 10 张秀萍, 卢小君, 黄晓颖. 基于三螺旋理论的区域协同创新网络结构分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2016(11): 82-88. 11 Carayannis E G, Campbell D F J. Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?[J]. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 2010, 1(1): 41-69. 12 尹彦. 区域协同创新能力成熟度评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2017(4): 62-66. 13 Kriz A, Bankins S, Molloy C. Readying a region: Temporally exploring the development of an Australian regional quadruple helix[J]. R&D Management, 2018, 48(1): 25-43. 14 H?glund L, Linton G. Smart specialization in regional innovation systems: A quadruple helix perspective[J]. R&D Management, 2018, 48(1): 60-72. 15 McAdam M, Miller K, McAdam R. Understanding quadruple helix relationships of university technology commercialisation: A micro-level approach[J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2018, 43(6): 1058-1073. 16 黄瑶, 王铭. “三螺旋”到“四螺旋”: 知识生产模式的动力机制演变[J]. 教育发展研究, 2018, 38(1): 69-75. 17 习近平. 为建设世界科技强国而奋斗——在全国科技创新大会、两院院士大会、中国科协第九次全国代表大会上的讲话[EB/OL]. (2016-05-31). http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2016-05/31/c_1118965169.htm. 18 中共中央、国务院印发《国家创新驱动发展战略纲要》[EB/OL]. (2016-05-19). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-05/19/content_5074812.htm. 19 国务院关于加快科技服务业发展的若干意见[EB/OL]. (2014-10-28). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-10/28/content_9173.htm. 20 国家统计局关于印发《国家科技服务业统计分类(2018)》的通知[EB/OL]. [2018-12-14]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgz/tzgb/201812/t20181218_1640075.html. 21 Swar B, Khan G F. An analysis of the information technology outsourcing domain: A social network and Triple helix approach[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(11): 2366-2378. 22 Priego J L O. A Vector Space Model as a methodological approach to the triple helix dimensionality: a comparative study of Biology and Biomedicine Centres of two European National Research Councils from a webometric view[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2): 429-443. 23 Sun Y, Negishi M. Measuring the relationships among university, industry and other sectors in Japan's national innovation system: a comparison of new approaches with mutual information indicators[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3): 677-685. 24 许海云, 齐燕, 岳增慧, 等. 三螺旋模型在协同创新管理中的计量方法和应用研究[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(3): 236-246. 25 Leydesdorff L. Synergy in knowledge-based innovation systems at national and regional levels: The triple-helix model and the fourth industrial revolution[J]. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 2018, 4(2): 16. 26 Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. The Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(3): 379-423. 27 Abramson N. Information theory and coding[M]. McGraw-Hill, 1963. 28 叶鹰, 鲁特·莱兹多夫, 武夷山. 三螺旋模型及其量化分析方法研讨[J]. 中国软科学, 2014(11): 131-139. 29 徐冠华. 2003年我国科技政策的重点与方向[J]. 中国创业投资与高科技, 2003(3): 4-7. |
|
|
|