|
|
|
| Research Review of Frontier Detection Methods in Subject Fields |
| Huang Xiaobin1, Wu Gao1,2 |
1.School of Information Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006
2.Library of Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract First the article introduces the related concepts of research fronts, then it divides the detection methods of subject research fronts into three types: detection methods based on the reference relationship (co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling analysis, and direct citation analysis), detection methods based on text content (word frequency analysis, co-word analysis, and topic model analysis), and detection methods based on the complex relationship. The development, application cases, and effects of each detection method are also reviewed. Finally, the defects of different types of frontier detection methods are summarized and their future trends in development and direction are predicted.
|
|
Received: 28 October 2018
|
|
|
|
1 EvansH. Emerging technologies IPC has Inaugural meeting[OL]. http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/05/15/emerging-technologies-ipc-has-unaugural-meeting.
2 Canada Foundation for Innovation. Innovation made in Canada best in the world (2009-10 Annual Report)[OL]. http://www.innovation.ca/docs/annualreport/CFIAnnualReport2009-2010.pdf.
3 马楠, 官建成. 利用引文分析方法识别研究前沿的进展与展望[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2006(4): 110-113, 128.
4 KontostathisA, GalitskyL M, PottengerW M, et al. A survey of emerging trend detection in textual data mining[M]// Survey of Text Mining. New York: Springer, 2004: 185-224.
5 钱力. 信息可视化领域研究热点及演化特征的可视化分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2013(6): 114-120.
6 de Solla PriceD J. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science, 1965, 149(3683): 510-515.
7 GarfieldE, SmallH. Identifying the changing frontiers of science[EB/OL]. [2019-05-01]. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/ papers/362/362.html.
8 UphamS P, SmallH. Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge development[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(1): 15-38.
9 SmallH. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, 24(4): 265-269.
10 GarfieldE. Research fronts[EB/OL]. [2019-05-01]. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays94.html.
11 PerssonO. The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994, 45(1): 31-38.
12 MorrisS A, YenG, WuZ, et al. Time line visualization of research fronts[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(5): 413-422.
13 KesslerM M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers[J]. American Documentation, 1963,14(1): 10-25.
14 BraamR R, MoedH F, van RaanA F J. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis.Ⅰ. Structural aspects[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1991, 42(4): 233-251.
15 ChenC M. CiteSpaceⅡ: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
16 陈超美. CiteSpaceⅡ: 科学文献中新趋势与新动态的识别与可视化[J]. 陈悦, 侯剑华, 梁永霞, 译. 情报学报, 2009, 28(3): 401-421.
17 ArisA, ShneidermanB, QazvinianV, et al. Visual overviews for discovering key papers and influences across research fronts[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(11): 2219-2228.
18 冯佳, 张云秋. 科学前沿探测方法述评[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2017, 36(5): 29-35.
19 赵继. 全面认识和合理使用ESI(基本科学指标)[J]. 中国高等教育, 2015(1): 31-34.
20 韩涛. 知识结构演化深度分析的方法及其实现[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2008.
21 WeinbergB H. Bibliographic coupling: A review[J]. Information Storage and Retrieval, 1974, 10(5-6): 189-196.
22 VladutzG, CookJ. Bibliographic coupling and subject relateness[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 1984, 21: 204-207.
23 Gl?nzelW, CzerwonH J. A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level[J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 37(2): 195-221.
24 SchiebelE. Visualization of research fronts and knowledge bases by three-dimensional areal densities of bibliographically-coupled publications and co-citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 557-566.
25 宋艳辉, 武夷山. 基于作者文献耦合分析的情报学知识结构研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(1): 117-123.
26 LiuJ S, LuL Y Y, LuW M. Research fronts in data envelopment analysis[J]. Omega, 2016, 58: 33-45.
27 ZhangL, Gl?nzelW, YeF Y. The dynamic evolution of core documents: An experimental study based on h-related literature (2005-2013)[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(1): 369-381.
28 GarfieldE. Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2004, 30(2): 119-145.
29 KlavansR, BoyackK W. Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(2): 251-263.
30 ShibataN, KajikawaY, TakedaY, et al. Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(11): 758-775.
31 ShibataN, KajikawaY, TakedaY, et al. Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(3): 571-580.
32 葛菲, 谭宗颖. 学科领域主题新兴趋势探测方法研究——基于关键词生命周期和引文分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(9): 78-82.
33 马费成, 张勤. 国内外知识管理研究热点——基于词频的统计分析[J]. 情报学报, 2006, 25(2): 163-171.
34 巩永强, 刘莉. 基于词频分析法的情报学研究热点透析[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2011(13): 9-13.
35 储节旺, 钱倩. 基于词频分析的近10年知识管理的研究热点及研究方法[J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32(10): 156-160.
36 刘奕杉, 王玉琳, 李明鑫. 词频分析法中高频词阈值界定方法适用性的实证分析[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2017(9): 42-49.
37 KleinbergJ. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams[C]// Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM Press, 2002: 91-101.
38 ManeK K, BornerK. Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(Supplement 1): 5287-5290.
39 洪娜, 张智雄, 乐小虬. 基于决策树的潜在爆发词探测方法[J]. 情报学报, 2012, 31(3): 228-241.
40 张英杰. 科技领域前沿计量探测方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2011.
41 王梦婷. 基于突变检测的主题突变分析研究[J]. 情报科学, 2016, 34(12): 36-39.
42 郑乐丹. 基于突变检测的学科领域新兴研究趋势探测分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2012, 31(9): 50-53.
43 Le MarcM, CourtialJ P, SenkovskaE D, et al. The dynamics of research in the psychology of work from 1973 to 1987: From the study of companies to the study of professions[J]. Scientometrics, 1991, 21(1): 69-86.
44 RipA, CourtialJ P. Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 1984, 6(6): 381-400.
45 CozzensS E, CallonM, LawJ, et al. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world[M]. Contemporary Sociology, 1988, 17(6): 815.
46 PetersH P F, van RaanA F J. Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. PartⅠ: Representations by direct multidimensional scaling[J]. Research Policy, 1993, 22(1): 23-45.
47 SuH N, LeeP C. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in technology foresight[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(1): 65-79.
48 郝伟霞, 滕立, 陈悦, 等. 基于共词分析的中国能源材料领域主题研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2011, 30(6): 70-75.
49 李纲, 李轶. 一种基于关键词加权的共词分析方法[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(3): 321-324, 332.
50 杨彦荣, 张阳. 加权共词分析法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011, 34(4): 61-63.
51 程齐凯, 王晓光. 一种基于共词网络社区的科研主题演化分析框架[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(8): 91-96.
52 魏瑞斌. 基于内容分析的国内图书情报学研究方法创新研究——以共词分析方法为例[J].图书情报工作, 2016, 60(24): 107-114.
53 许晓阳, 郑彦宁, 刘志辉. 论文和专利相结合的研究前沿识别方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(24): 97-106.
54 DeerwesterS, DumaisS T, FurnasG W, et al. Indexing by latent semantic analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1990, 41(6): 391-407.
55 HofmannT. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Pesearch and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, 1999: 50-57.
56 BleiD M, NgA Y, JordanM I. Latent Dirichlet allocation[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3: 993-1022.
57 ZhangJ, GhahramaniZ, YangY M. A probabilistic model for online document clustering with application to novelty detection[C]// Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004: 1617-1624.
58 BleiD M, LaffertyJ D. Dynamic topic model[C]// Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. New York: ACM Press, 2006: 113-120.
59 WuQ Q, ZhangC D, AnX Y, et al. Topic segmentation model based on ATNLDA and co-occurrence theory and its application in stem cell field[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2013, 39(3): 319-332.
60 范云满, 马建霞. 基于LDA与新兴主题特征分析的新兴主题探测研究[J]. 情报学报, 2014, 33(7): 698-711.
61 LeeY S, LoR, ChenC Y, et al. News topics categorization using latent Dirichlet allocation and Sparse representation classifier[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics. New York: IEEE, 2015: 136-137.
62 白如江, 冷伏海, 廖君华. 一种基于多数据源主题对比的科学研究前沿识别方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(8): 43-48, 36.
63 BraamR R, MoedH F, van RaanA F J. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991, 42(4): 233-251.
64 GlenissonP, Gl?nzelW, JanssensF, et al. Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2005, 41(6): 1548-1572.
65 van den BesselaarP, HeimeriksG. Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrence: A method and an exploratory case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(3): 377-393.
66 侯海燕, 刘则渊, 栾春娟. 基于知识图谱的国际科学计量学研究前沿计量分析[J]. 科研管理, 2009, 30(1): 164-170.
67 BoyackK W, KlavansR. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(12): 2389-2404.
68 周丽英, 冷伏海, 左文革. 引文耦合增强的共词分析方法改进研究——以ESI农业科学研究主题划分为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(11): 120-125.
69 XieP. Study of international anticancer research trends via co-word and document co-citation visualization analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(1): 611-622. |
|
|
|
