|
|
Comprehensive Amendment and Research on h Index: htop Index |
Yu Liping1, 2, Wang Zuogong2, and Zhang Zaijie2 |
1. Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018; 2. Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Institute of Green Development Strategy in Western China, Guiyang 550025 |
|
|
Abstract To avoid defects of the h index, which include decreased importance of highly cited papers, greater impact from downloads of papers, and low discrimination, this paper proposes the htop index, which uses the h index divided by the logarithm of downloads and multiplied by the proportion of highly cited papers. It is shown that the htop index is a great bibliometric indicator that is suitable for defining the time ranges of assessed objectives in the basis of the CNKI database and CSSCI library. Further efforts to revise the htop index may help solve the issue of cooperation between the author and measure and to generalize the htop index as a bibliometric indicator.
|
Received: 26 July 2017
|
|
|
|
[1] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005,102(46): 16569- 16572.
[2] Braun T, Glanzel W, Schubert A. A Hirsch-type index for journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 169-173.
[3] van Raan A F J. Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgement for 147 chemistry research groups[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 67(3): 491-502.
[4] Guan J C, Gao X. Exploring the h-index at patent level[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 2008, 59(13): 1-61.
[5] Liu Y X, Rousseau R. Hirsch-type indices and library management: the case of Tongji University Library[C]// Proceedings of the 11th ISSI Conference, 2007: 514-522.
[6] Gl?nzel W. On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 67(2): 315-321.
[7] Schreiber M. Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index[J]. Physics, 2007, 78(3): 30002.
[8] Wan J K, Hua P H, Rousseau R. The pure h-index: calculating an author’s h-index by taking co-authors into account[J]. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2007, 1(2): 1-5.
[9] Rousseau R. 案例研究: 美国信息学会会刊h指数的时间序列变化[J]. 刘俊婉, 译. 科学观察, 2006, 1(1): 16-17.
[10] 聂超, 朱国祥. h指数在科研评价中的缺陷及其对策[J]. 情报理论与实践,2009, 32(11): 1-2, 7.
[11] 张学梅. hi指数——一种对h指数进行迭代计算的个人学术影响力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(11): 96-99, 119.
[12] Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 131-152.
[13] Kosmulski M. A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index[J]. ISSI Newsletter, 2006, 2(3): 4-6.
[14] Jin B H, Liang L M, Rousseau R, et al. The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(6): 855-863.
[15] Alonso S, Cabrerizo F J, Herrera-Viedma E, et al. hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(2): 391-400.
[16] 聂超, 魏泽峰. 基于学术影响力差异h指数改进的实证研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2010, 29(5): 89-91.
[17] Anderson T R, Hankin R K S, Killworth P D. Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 76(3): 577-588.
[18] Sidiropoulos A, Katsaros D, Manolopoulos Y. Generalized hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks[J]. Scien-tometrics, 2007, 72(2): 253-280.
[19] 安静, 夏旭, 李海燕, 等. 类h指数: K指数的修正机理及实证分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2009(6): 382-384.
[20] Ruane F, Tol R. Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2): 395-405. |
|
|
|