摘要作为创新活动的参与者，创新催化者对技术创新效率的提升发挥着重要的支撑作用。但针对技术创新催化能力测量的研究十分有限，且多以问卷调研的主观评价为核心手段，缺乏综合性、量化测量工具与方法。本研究通过对技术创新催化能力内涵的界定与解析，提出技术创新溢出催化与扩散催化的二维概念结构模型；并结合专利合作申请人排名与引文信息特征，从技术催化强度与广度两个方面，构建多维测量指标体系；进而以中、美、日、韩的国际创新催化者为样本，探究创新催化者技术创新催化能力水平差异与特征。研究结果表明：①技术创新催化能力具有二阶多维的结构特征，并进一步体现为创新催化的强度与范围两个方面，能够从创新催化的贡献、质量、地理范围、主体范围四个指标进行衡量；②创新催化者在各维度指标及能力上呈现两种能力偏好，即以Toyota（Toyota Motor Corp）为代表的同时发展技术溢出与扩散催化能力，与以SEC（Samsung Electronics Company）为代表的偏好技术扩散催化，而SG（State Grid Corporation of China）的“高溢出催化-低扩散催化”模式具有个体特殊性；③中、日、韩、美四国创新催化者的溢出催化能力依次降低，而扩散催化能力排名则恰好相反。本研究丰富了技术创新能力的概念与测量研究，进一步揭示了创新催化者催化能力特征，能够为创新合作伙伴的评价与选择提供新的决策视角与方法。
宋昊阳, 侯剑华, 张洋. 基于专利计量的技术创新催化能力的多维度测量[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(3): 300-313.
Song Haoyang, Hou Jianhua, Zhangyang. Multidimensional Measurement of the Catalytic Capacity of Technology Innovation Based on Patentometrics. 情报学报, 2022, 41(3): 300-313.
1 刘海兵. 创新情境、开放式创新与创新能力动态演化[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(9): 1680-1693. 2 Schwartz D, Bar-El R. The role of a local industry association as a catalyst for building an innovation ecosystem: an experiment in the state of Ceara in Brazil[J]. Innovation, 2015, 17(3): 383-399. 3 Amitrano C C, Coppola M, Tregua M, et al. Knowledge sharing in innovation ecosystems: a focus on functional food industry[J]. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2017, 14(5): 1750030. 4 Ben Letaifa S. The uneasy transition from supply chains to ecosystems: the value-creation/value-capture dilemma[J]. Management Decision, 2014, 52(2): 278-295. 5 Brettel M, Cleven N J. Innovation culture, collaboration with external partners and NPD performance[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2011, 20(4): 253-272. 6 Wang L W, Jin J L, Banister D. Resources, state ownership and innovation capability: evidence from Chinese automakers[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2019, 28(2): 203-217. 7 Janssen M J, Bogers M, Wanzenb?ck I. Do systemic innovation intermediaries broaden horizons? A proximity perspective on R&D partnership formation[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2020, 27(6): 605-629. 8 Reus B, Moser C, Groenewegen P. Expanding organisational knowledge online: the role of bridging members in knowledge expansion in online groups[J/OL]. Innovation, (2020-11-09). https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1840381. 9 Liu Y P, Meyer K E. Boundary spanners, HRM practices, and reverse knowledge transfer: the case of Chinese cross-border acquisitions[J]. Journal of World Business, 2020, 55(2): 100958. 10 Villani E, Rasmussen E, Grimaldi R. How intermediary organizations facilitate university-industry technology transfer: a proximity approach[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 114: 86-102. 11 de Silva M, Howells J, Meyer M. Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: knowledge-based practices and internal value creation[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(1): 70-87. 12 Howells J. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(5): 715-728. 13 Agogué M, Berthet E, Fredberg T, et al. Explicating the role of innovation intermediaries in the “unknown”: a contingency approach[J]. Journal of Strategy and Management, 2017, 10(1): 19-39. 14 Lin M, Wei J. The impact of innovation intermediary on knowledge transfer[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 502: 21-28. 15 魏龙, 党兴华. 惯例复制、网络闭包与创新催化: 一个交互效应模型[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(3): 165-175, 190. 16 Martin R L. The innovation catalysts[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2011, 89(6): 82-87, 136. 17 Tortoriello M, McEvily B, Krackhardt D. Being a catalyst of innovation: the role of knowledge diversity and network closure[J]. Organization Science, 2015, 26(2): 423-438. 18 Beretta M, S?ndergaard H A. Employee behaviours beyond innovators in internal crowdsourcing: what do employees do in internal crowdsourcing, if not innovating, and why?[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2021, 30(3): 542-562. 19 杨剑钊, 李晓娣. 前摄型人格对越轨创新绩效作用路径研究——创新催化的中介作用及变革型领导行为的调节作用[J]. 预测, 2019, 38(4): 17-23. 20 魏龙, 党兴华. 惯例复制对越轨创新的影响: 网络闭合与知识基础的调节[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(10): 30-39. 21 van Niekerk L, Mathanga D P, Juban N, et al. Universities as catalysts of social innovation in health systems in low-and middle-income countries: a multi-country case study[J]. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 2020, 9(1): 90. 22 Lin H, Zeng S X, Liu H J, et al. How do intermediaries drive corporate innovation? A moderated mediating examination[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(11): 4831-4836. 23 Vallejo B, Oyelaran-Oyeyinka B, Ozor N, et al. Open innovation and innovation intermediaries in sub-Saharan Africa[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(2): 392. 24 Evans D S, Schmalensee R. Catalyst code: the strategies behind the world’s most dynamic companies[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2007. 25 Edler J, Yeow J. Connecting demand and supply: the role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(2): 414-426. 26 Weng C S. Innovation intermediaries in technological alliances[J]. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2017, 14(2): 1740013. 27 Ollila S, Elmquist M. Managing open innovation: exploring challenges at the interfaces of an open innovation arena[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2011, 20(4): 273-283. 28 Sieg J H, Wallin M W, von Krogh G. Managerial challenges in open innovation: a study of innovation intermediation in the chemical industry[J]. R&D Management, 2010, 40(3): 281-291. 29 Chiambaretto P, Massé D, Mirc N. “All for One and One for All?”-Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: the Ubisoft case[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(3): 584-600. 30 魏龙, 党兴华. 网络闭合、知识基础与创新催化: 动态结构洞的调节[J]. 管理科学, 2017, 30(3): 83-96. 31 胡苏捷, 庄越. 如何激发协同创新的催化效应——基于新型研发组织的案例研究[J]. 财会月刊, 2018(22): 111-116. 32 朱明明, 万文涛. 中国科研团队在科技创新人才成长过程中的“襄助效应”研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2017, 35(4): 87-90, 98. 33 张丽华, 田丹, 曲建升. 科研合作模式与科研人员角色的变化规律分析——以病毒学领域职业生涯至少为30年的作者为例[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(7): 719-730. 34 尹聪慧, 余翔. 企业CCS技术国际合作路径及模式研究—基于专利计量分析的视角[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(10): 70-75. 35 吕一博, 韦明, 林歌歌. 基于专利计量的技术融合研究: 判定、现状与趋势——以物联网与人工智能领域为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(4): 16-31. 36 毛荐其, 李新秀, 陈雷. 纳米能源领域技术发明能力比较研究[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(3): 104-113. 37 曹明, 陈荣, 孙济庆, 等. 基于专利分析的技术竞争力比较研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2016, 34(3): 380-385, 470. 38 沈慧君, 孙嘉悦, 黄灿, 等. 知识来源的地理范围、研发模式与创新价值获取[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(7): 1285-1293. 39 Zheng Q, Huang L C, Wu F F, et al. Analyzing technological knowledge diffusion among technological fields using patent data: the example of microfluidics[J]. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2017, 14(1): 1740004. 40 Ma D, Yu Q, Li J, et al. Innovation diffusion enabler or barrier: an investigation of international patenting based on temporal exponential random graph models[J]. Technology in Society, 2021, 64: 101456. 41 Yu D J, Sheng L B. Knowledge diffusion paths of blockchain domain: the main path analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(1): 471-497. 42 Yang C H, Chen C J, Shyu J Z. Innovation intermediary for creating regional knowledge capabilities in knowledge cluster[C]// Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. IEEE, 2008: 831-835. 43 Kokshagina O, Le Masson P, Bories F. Fast-connecting search practices: on the role of open innovation intermediary to accelerate the absorptive capacity[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 120: 232-239. 44 曹勇, 蒋振宇, 孙合林. 创新开放度对新兴企业知识溢出效应的影响研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(1): 151-161.
