信息计量领域网络分析方法应用研究综述

doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2021.10.009

情报学报

2021, Vol. 40

Issue (10): 1118-1128 DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2021.10.009

情报学科研究与趋势

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

信息计量领域网络分析方法应用研究综述

吴江^1,2, 王凯利², 董克^1,2, 杨玉洁², 易梦馨²

1.武汉大学信息资源研究中心，武汉 430072
2.武汉大学信息管理学院，武汉 430072

Review of Application Research on Network Analysis in Informetrics

Wu Jiang^1,2, Wang Kaili², Dong Ke^1,2, Yang Yujie², Yi Mengxin²

1.Center for Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072
2.School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (928 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要网络分析方法在信息计量领域中的应用研究取得了许多重要成果，目前，相关研究已经进入调整阶段，本文总结梳理了目前的研究现状，能够为该领域的可持续发展提供借鉴。从信息计量领域中网络分析方法应用的发展历程出发，本文提出了信息计量领域网络分析方法应用的研究框架，论述了网络分析方法的本质，进一步从宏观、中观和微观三个层面系统梳理了现有应用的研究成果，最后，总结了不同层面上网络分析方法未来应用研究的方向。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	吴江
	王凯利
	董克
	杨玉洁
	易梦馨

关键词 ：网络分析, 信息计量, 合作网络, 引文网络, 共引网络, 耦合网络, 共词网络

收稿日期: 2020-10-09

基金资助:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“网络环境下大数据新动能机制研究”（20JZD024）。

作者简介: 吴江，男，1978年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，研究方向为社会网络计算、网络信息计量，E-mail：jiangw@whu.edu.cn；王凯利，女，1992年生，博士研究生，研究方向为科学计量；董克，1986年生，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，研究方向为科学计量、信息计量；杨玉洁，女，1998年生，硕士研究生，研究方向为信息计量；易梦馨，女，1998年生，硕士研究生，研究方向为用户行为研；

引用本文:

吴江, 王凯利, 董克, 杨玉洁, 易梦馨. 信息计量领域网络分析方法应用研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(10): 1118-1128.
Wu Jiang, Wang Kaili, Dong Ke, Yang Yujie, Yi Mengxin. Review of Application Research on Network Analysis in Informetrics. 情报学报, 2021, 40(10): 1118-1128.

链接本文:

http://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2021.10.009 或 http://qbxb.istic.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I10/1118

1 吴江. 社会网络的动态分析与仿真实验——理论与应用[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2012: 12-15.
2 方锦清, 汪小帆, 郑志刚, 等. 一门崭新的交叉科学: 网络科学(上)[J]. 物理学进展, 2007, 27(3): 239-343.
3 Otte E, Rousseau R. Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2002, 28(6): 441-453.
4 Borgatti S P, Mehra A, Brass D J, et al. Network analysis in the social sciences[J]. Science, 2009, 323(5916): 892-895.
5 朱庆华, 李亮. 社会网络分析法及其在情报学中的应用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2008, 31(2): 179-183, 174.
6 陈庆伟, 赵鹏. 社会网络分析法在情报学中的应用现状研究[J]. 情报探索, 2010(10): 36-37.
7 廖小琴, 刘虹, 孙建军. 链接网络与核心节点评价指标研究综述[J]. 情报杂志, 2012, 31(5): 166-171.
8 陈云伟. 社会网络分析方法在情报分析中的应用研究[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(1): 21-28.
9 万昊, 谭宗颖, 鲁晶晶, 等. 2001—2014年引文分析领域发展演化综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(6): 120-136.
10 冯璐, 冷伏海. 共词分析方法理论进展[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2006, 32(2): 88-92.
11 张继洋, 李宁. 科学合著网络研究进展分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012, 35(4): 124-128.
12 de Solla Price D J. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science, 1965, 149(3683): 510-515.
13 Yoon B, Park Y. A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend[J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2004, 15(1): 37-50.
14 李江, 刘源浩, 黄萃, 等. 用文献计量研究重塑政策文本数据分析——政策文献计量的起源、迁移与方法创新[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015, 12(2): 138-144, 159.
15 Yin L C, Kretschmer H, Hanneman R A, et al. Connection and stratification in research collaboration: an analysis of the COLLNET network[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2006, 42(6): 1599-1613.
16 Andrikopoulos A, Bekiaris M, Kostaris K. Stars in a small world: social networks in auditing research[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 122(1): 625-643.
17 贺超城, 吴江, 魏子瑶, 等. 科研合作中机构间科研主导力及邻近性机理——以中国生物医学领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(2): 148-157.
18 Guns R, Liu Y X, Mahbuba D. Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: a case study of the field of informetrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(1): 133-147.
19 Wang J B, Yang N D. Dynamics of collaboration network community and exploratory innovation: the moderation of knowledge networks[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 121(2): 1067-1084.
20 Barnett G A, Huh C, Kim Y, et al. Citations among communication journals and other disciplines: a network analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(2): 449-469.
21 Park H W, Leydesdorff L. Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(1): 157-175.
22 吴江, 金妙, 陈君. 基金视角下的学科知识流动网络构建与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(8): 79-85.
23 Hellsten I, Lambiotte R, Scharnhorst A, et al. Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: a new approach to scientists' field mobility?[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(3): 469-486.
24 Lungeanu A, Huang Y, Contractor N S. Understanding the assembly of interdisciplinary teams and its impact on performance[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(1): 59-70.
25 周建林, 牛琪锴, 曾安, 等. 基于复杂网络视角的科学文献数据分析[J]. 科技导报, 2018, 36(8): 55-64.
26 Redner S. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution[J]. The European Physical Journal B, 1998, 4(2): 131-134.
27 ?ubelj L, Fiala D, Bajec M. Network-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4: 6496.
28 Martin T, Ball B, Karrer B, et al. Coauthorship and citation patterns in the Physical Review[J]. Physical Review E, 2013, 88(1): 012814.
29 Newman M E J. The first-mover advantage in scientific publication[J]. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 2009, 86(6): 68001.
30 de Solla Price D. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1976, 27(5): 292-306.
31 Burt R S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 110(2): 349-399.
32 Porter A L, Rafols I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 719-745.
33 宋歌. 共被引分析方法迭代创新路径研究[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(1): 12-24.
34 方滨兴, 许进, 李建华. 在线社交网络分析[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2014.
35 孙海生. 基于Web of Science数据库的文献耦合网络实证研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(10): 201-207, 166.
36 Deng S L, Xia S D. Mapping the interdisciplinarity in information behavior research: a quantitative study using diversity measure and co-occurrence analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 124(1): 489-513.
37 Santa Soriano A, Lorenzo álvarez C, Torres Valdés R M. Bibliometric analysis to identify an emerging research area: Public Relations Intelligence—a challenge to strengthen technological observatories in the network society[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(3): 1591-1614.
38 Hu Q Y. The quantitative analysis of difference between Chinese and German libraries subject services[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2019, 38(2): 334-349.
39 Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Takeda Y, et al. Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(3): 571-580.
40 Yang S L, Han R Z, Wolfram D, et al. Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006-2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(1): 132-150.
41 Qiu J P, Dong K, Yu H Q. Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1345-1360.
42 Yu Q, Shao H F, Duan Z G. Research groups of oncology co-authorship network in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(2): 553-567.
43 李纲, 李春雅, 李翔. 基于社会网络分析的科研团队发现研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(7): 63-70, 82.
44 Yan E J, Ding Y, Milojevi? S, et al. Topics in dynamic research communities: an exploratory study for the field of information retrieval[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6(1): 140-153.
45 肖雪, 陈云伟, 邓勇. 引文网络的社团划分研究进展综述[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(4): 125-130.
46 Ni C Q, Sugimoto C R, Cronin B. Visualizing and comparing four facets of scholarly communication: producers, artifacts, concepts, and gatekeepers[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(3): 1161-1173.
47 Takeda Y, Kajikawa Y. Optics: a bibliometric approach to detect emerging research domains and intellectual bases[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(3): 543-558.
48 Chen P, Redner S. Community structure of the physical review citation network[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(3): 278-290.
49 Rossetto D E, Bernardes R C, Borini F M, et al. Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(3): 1329-1363.
50 González-Teruel A, González-Alcaide G, Barrios M, et al. Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(2): 687-705.
51 Fang Y Q. Visualizing the structure and the evolving of digital medicine: a scientometrics review[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(1): 5-21.
52 Guan J C, Shi Y A. Transnational citation, technological diversity and small world in global nanotechnology patenting[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 93(3): 609-633.
53 Chen C M, Hicks D. Tracing knowledge diffusion[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(2): 199-211.
54 Barirani A, Agard B, Beaudry C. Discovering and assessing fields of expertise in nanomedicine: a patent co-citation network perspective[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(3): 1111-1136.
55 Yoon J, Kim K. Identifying rapidly evolving technological trends for R&D planning using SAO-based semantic patent networks[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1): 213-228.
56 Hummon N P, Dereian P. Connectivity in a citation network: the development of DNA theory[J]. Social Networks, 1989, 11(1): 39-63.
57 Xiao Y, Lu L Y Y, Liu J S, et al. Knowledge diffusion path analysis of data quality literature: a main path analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(3): 594-605.
58 Liang H G, Wang J J, Xue Y J, et al. IT outsourcing research from 1992 to 2013: a literature review based on main path analysis[J]. Information & Management, 2016, 53(2): 227-251.
59 Small H. The relationship of information science to the social sciences: a co-citation analysis[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1981, 17(1): 39-50.
60 王建芳, 冷伏海. 共引分析理论与实践进展[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2006, 32(1): 85-88.
61 Chen C M, Kuljis J. The rising landscape: a visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(5): 435-446.
62 Noma E. Co‐citation analysis and the invisible college[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1984, 35(1): 29-33.
63 Palacios-Nú?ez G, Vélez-Cuartas G, Botero J D. Developmental tendencies in the academic field of intellectual property through the identification of invisible colleges[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(3): 1561-1574.
64 Zhao D Z, Strotmann A. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(13): 2070-2086.
65 陈远, 王菲菲. 基于CSSCI的国内情报学领域作者文献耦合分析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2011(5): 6-12.
66 孙涛涛, 金碧辉. 关键技术挖掘与企业技术竞争情报——以DVD激光头技术为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2008, 52(5): 129-132.
67 孙涛涛, 刘云. 基于专利耦合的企业技术竞争情报分析[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(9): 140-146, 156.
68 Liu G Y, Hu J M, Wang H L. A co-word analysis of digital library field in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(1): 203-217.
69 吴江, 刘冠君, 胡仙. 在线医疗健康研究的系统综述: 研究热点、主题演化和研究方法[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(4): 2-12.
70 Hu J M, Zhang Y. Research patterns and trends of Recommendation System in China using co-word analysis[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2015, 51(4): 329-339.
71 王林, 薛玮, 潘陈益, 等. 虚拟现实研究热点及演化趋势分析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2017, 7(3): 34-44.
72 郑乐丹. 基于突变检测的学科领域新兴研究趋势探测分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2012, 31(9): 50-53.
73 Feng J, Zhang Y Q, Zhang H. Improving the co-word analysis method based on semantic distance[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(3): 1521-1531.
74 张晗, 赵玉虹. 医学文献语义共词知识网的构建: 方法与实证[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(11): 135-142.
75 蔡永明, 长青. 共词网络LDA模型的中文短文本主题分析[J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(3): 305-317.
76 Lin X, White H D, Buzydlowski J W. Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2003, 39(5): 689-706.
77 孙巍, 张学福. 基于引文的信息检索可视化相关系统比较分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2008, 31(4): 598-601.
78 Fiala D. Time-aware PageRank for bibliographic networks[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6(3): 370-388.
79 杜建, 张玢, 唐小利. 基于作者引用与合作关系的学术影响力测度研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(8): 135-140.
80 周朝阳, 贺艳菊, 柳路芳. 融合合著者多样性及影响力的学术新星预测方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(2): 78-83, 71.
81 吕伟民, 王小梅, 韩涛. 结合链路预测和ET机器学习的科研合作推荐方法研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(4): 38-45.
82 Rorissa A, Yuan X J. Visualizing and mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2012, 48(1): 120-135.
83 Zhang L, Gl?nzel W, Liang L M. Tracing the role of individual journals in a cross-citation network based on different indicators[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 821-838.
84 Zhao R Y, Wang J. Visualizing the research on pervasive and ubiquitous computing[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 86(3): 593-612.
85 Yang G C, Li G, Li C Y, et al. Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3): 1319-1346.
86 Zhang X Q, Yang F. Rural informatization policy evolution in China: a bibliometric study[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(1): 129-153.
87 Lin Y J, Li W Y, Chen K K, et al. A document clustering and ranking system for exploring MEDLINE citations[J]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2007, 14(5): 651-661.
88 Huynh T, Hoang K, Do L, et al. Scientific publication recommendations based on collaborative citation networks[C]// Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems. IEEE, 2012: 316-321.
89 Leydesdorff L, Wagner C S, Bornmann L. The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: competition and collaborations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(3): 606-617.
90 Zhang L, Janssens F, Liang L M, et al. Journal cross-citation analysis for validation and improvement of journal-based subject classification in bibliometric research[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3): 687-706.
91 Reyes-Gonzalez L, González-Brambila C N, Veloso F. Using co-authorship and citation analysis to identify research groups: a new way to assess performance[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 108(3): 1171-1191.
92 Zhai Q H, Su J, Ye M H. Focus on China: the current status of entrepreneurship research in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(3): 1985-2006.
93 Rees-Potter L K. Dynamic thesaural systems: a bibliometric study of terminological and conceptual change in sociology and economics with application to the design of dynamic thesaural systems[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1989, 25(6): 677-689.
94 邱均平, 楼雯. 基于共现分析的语义信息检索研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(6): 89-99.
95 刘志辉, 张志强. 作者关键词耦合分析方法及实证研究[J]. 情报学报, 2010, 29(2): 268-275.
96 陈卫静, 郑颖. 基于作者关键词耦合的潜在合作关系挖掘[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(5): 127-131.
97 Wang F F, Jayroe T J, Qiu J P, et al. Analysis on research activity and impact of authors in Chinese information science based on citation relationship[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2014, 70(3): 461-477.
98 Kuusi O, Meyer M. Anticipating technological breakthroughs: using bibliographic coupling to explore the nanotubes paradigm[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 70(3): 759-777.
99 Zhao R Y, Wu S N. Study on themes and authors' influence of open access in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1165-1177.
100 Lin F L, Chiou G F. Prestige as an indicator of knowledge exchange in the community of school technology coordinators[J]. Online Information Review, 2010, 34(1): 5-20.
101 Wang M Y, Chai L H. Three new bibliometric indicators/approaches derived from keyword analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(2): 721-750.
102 王凌燕, 方曙, 季培培. 利用专利文献识别新兴技术主题的技术框架研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(18): 74-78, 23.
103 张杰, 刘粉香, 翟东升, 等. 基于共现网络的核心技术领域识别研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2012, 31(11): 35-39.
104 黄晓斌, 梁辰. 专利技术的关联网络分析——以4G通信技术领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(1): 92-104.
105 Huang C, Su J, Xie X A, et al. A bibliometric study of China's science and technology policies: 1949-2010[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(2): 1521-1539.
106 陈慧茹, 肖相泽, 冯锋. 科技创新政策加权共词网络研究——基于扎根理论与政策测量[J].科学学研究, 2016, 34(12): 1769-1776.
107 章小童, 李月琳. 人工智能政策与规划的主题结构: 基于主题词共现网络分析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2019, 40(4): 44-55.
108 Fiala D, Tutoky G. PageRank-based prediction of award-winning researchers and the impact of citations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11(4): 1044-1068.
109 Behrouzi S, Shafaeipour Sarmoor Z, Hajsadeghi K, et al. Predicting scientific research trends based on link prediction in keyword networks[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2020, 14(4): 101079.