|
|
|
| Review on Patent Technology Complementarity: Concepts, Measures, and Applications |
| Zhang Jinzhu1, Shi Jialu1, Zhang Chengzhi1,2 |
1.Department of Information Management, School of Economics & Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094
2.Key Laboratory of Rich-media Knowledge Organization and Service of Digital Publishing Content, Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As an important reference for technological innovation in various organizations, patent technology complementarity has recently received extensive attention from scholars worldwide. This paper first presents a review of the evolution of the technology complementarity concept and generalizes its measurement methods from four perspectives: industry/trade classification, patent classification, patent citation relationship, and patent content feature association. Then, various applications of patent technology complementarity are summarized. This review focuses on the concept of patent technology complementarity and indicates that relevant studies primarily use patent classification or a patent citation network to form technology complementarity measurement indices and methods, which are mostly applied in the innovation of the performance factor determination, enterprise of merger and acquisition (M&A) decision making, and potential partner discovery. In the future, we intend to continue to refine the technology complementarity concept, make comprehensive use of multimodal heterogeneous data such as patent text, chart, and market information, design fine-grained quantitative measurement indices, improve the accuracy of the patent technology complementarity measurement by introducing recently developed methods such as deep learning, and broaden the application effect and scope of patent technology complementarity.
|
|
Received: 24 November 2022
|
|
|
|
1 Garfield E. Patent citation indexing and the notions of novelty, similarity, and relevance[J]. Journal of Chemical Documentation, 1966, 6(2): 63-65.
2 Jaffe A B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value[J]. The American Economic Review, 1986, 76(5): 984-1001.
3 Andewelt R B. Analysis of patent pools under the antitrust laws[J]. Antitrust Law Journal, 1984, 53(3): 611-639.
4 茹丽洁, 张娴. 专利技术相关性研究方法进展评述与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(6): 128-134, 141.
5 徐晟, 袁德玉, 赵惠芳, 等. 互补性专利下创业企业协同创新投资策略研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(6): 75-79.
6 Larsson R, Finkelstein S. Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: a case survey of synergy realization[J]. Organization Science, 1999, 10(1): 1-26.
7 Makri M, Hitt M A, Lane P J. Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(6): 602-628.
8 Ramani S V, de Looze M A. Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sectors: an application to France, Germany and the U.K.[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(3): 319-346.
9 Santoro M D, Betts S C. Making industry-university partnerships work[J]. Research-Technology Management, 2002, 45(3): 42-46.
10 唐要家, 唐春晖. 互补性创新模式下的许可合作均衡[J]. 财经科学, 2008(8): 69-76.
11 王怀祖, 熊中楷, 黄俊. 考虑后续产品产量竞争的互补性专利联盟形成问题研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2008, 28(9): 50-52.
12 王怀祖, 苏平, 黄俊. 网络外部性环境下非对称性专利联盟形成问题研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2013, 33(1): 158-163.
13 Chang P C, Chang Y H, Su F P, et al. The study on patent acquisition from complementarity and supplementarity: evidence from smartphones of Apple and Samsung[C]// Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. Piscataway: IEEE, 2014: 2996-3003.
14 曾德明, 周涛. 企业知识基础结构与技术创新绩效关系研究——知识元素间关系维度新视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(10): 80-88.
15 陈珧. 技术获取型海外并购整合与技术创新——基于中国企业和韩国企业的对比研究[J]. 世界经济研究, 2016(8): 114-125, 137.
16 茹丽洁, 张娴, 许海云, 等. 面向技术转移的专利组合技术关联性测度研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(2): 73-78.
17 茅迪, 施建军, 陈效林. 知识相关性对创新绩效影响的实证研究——企业技术并购视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(15): 129-136.
18 李昌, 周锦锦, 韩盟. 基于核心集筛选与聚类的潜在专利技术组合识别方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(2): 178-184.
19 赵展一, 李贞贞, 钟永恒, 等. 融合专利类别与语义信息的企业潜在技术关系测算方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(3): 200-208.
20 Kim J, Lee S, Marschke G. Impact of university scientists on innovations in nanotechnology[M]// Intellectual Property for Economic Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014: 141-158.
21 蒋芬. “联合开发、优势互补、利益共享、风险共担”: 产业技术创新战略联盟是产学研结合的趋势[J]. 华东科技, 2009(12): 36-37.
22 李海涛. 互补性专利联盟的卡特尔管制问题研究[J]. 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 2008, 23(1): 32-37.
23 Santore R, McKee M, Bjornstad D. Patent pools as a solution to efficient licensing of complementary patents? Some experimental evidence[J]. The Journal of Law and Economics, 2010, 53(1): 167-183.
24 洪结银. 互补性专利联盟是否必要——一个基于讨价还价许可模式的新见解[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(1): 60-68, 122.
25 罗猷韬, 杜晓君, 夏冬. 竞争性专利联盟的形成分析[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 34(6): 898-900.
26 Cho Y, Lee Y. The use of IP profiles in selecting and structuring R&D alliances[J]. Research-Technology Management, 2016, 59(2): 18-27.
27 张端阳, 肖国华, 李文燕. 面向专利集成的专利技术相关性测度方法研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(11): 54-61.
28 Wang C C, Chen D Z. Patent analysis in external technology acquisition: a case of Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. Piscataway: IEEE, 2016: 2941-2947.
29 Karvonen M, Lehtovaara M, Kassi T. Managing technological convergence: evidence from printed intelligence industry[C]// Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. Piscataway: IEEE, 2009: 396-408.
30 姚艳虹, 谢敏, 葛哲宇. 协同网络中知识域耦合对企业二元创新的影响[J]. 华东经济管理, 2019, 33(7): 120-127.
31 王媛, 曾德明, 文金艳. 跨领域技术融合对企业新产品开发绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(8): 114-122.
32 陈培祯, 李健, 曾德明. 知识替代性和互补性对企业新产品开发数量的影响[J]. 管理科学, 2021, 34(4): 89-100.
33 宋昱晓, 苗红. 基于专利的技术融合趋势的驱动因素研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(12): 98-105.
34 肖丁丁, 王保隆, 田文华. 海外技术并购对双元能力成长模式的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(11): 2048-2057.
35 赵黎明, 陈妍庆. 创新存量、技术互补性与跨国并购技术创新绩效[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(2): 68-83.
36 张峥, 聂思. 中国制造业上市公司并购创新绩效研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(4): 36-43.
37 宁烨, 鞠阳, 王姗姗. 技术相关性对海外并购创新绩效的影响——基于技术获取型海外并购的实证研究[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(6): 42-49.
38 曹兴, 王燕红. 跨界技术并购对企业财务绩效影响实证研究[J]. 系统工程, 2022, 40(2): 38-48.
39 傅强, 曾琼. 非对称信息条件下政府对互补性研发合作体的激励政策选择——理论及实证研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2008, 20(6): 16-22.
40 胥朝阳, 黄晶, 颜金秋, 等. 上市公司技术并购绩效研究[J]. 中大管理研究, 2009, 4(4): 18-34.
41 Peng S, Wu S B, Tu C Y. On the technological innovation chain's structure, formation and operation[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Building Materials. Aedermannsdorf: Trans Tech Publications, 2012: 174-177.
42 Wang M Y, Chiu T F, Chen W Y. Exploring potential R&D collaborators based on patent portfolio analysis: the case of biosensors[C]// Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. Piscataway: IEEE, 2009: 322-330.
43 Cordeiro P V M, Dergint D E A, Hatakeyama K. System for automatic entrepreneurial complementarity search through patents data bases[C]// Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. Piscataway: IEEE, 2010: 1-6.
44 Colombelli A, Krafft J, Quatraro F. Properties of knowledge base and firm survival: evidence from a sample of French manufacturing firms[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013, 80(8): 1469-1483.
45 Jee S J, Sohn S Y. Patent-based framework for assisting entrepreneurial firms' R&D partner selection: leveraging their limited resources and managing the tension between learning and protection[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2020, 57: 101575.
46 陈菲琼, 陈珧, 李飞. 技术获取型海外并购中的资源相似性、互补性与创新表现: 整合程度及目标方自主性的中介作用[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2015(7): 137-147.
47 Huang L, Zhou Q J, Wang C, et al. An exploration of the concept of complementarity over knowledge spaces in firm acquisitions[C]// Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Berlin: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019: 782-791.
48 尚利宁. 面向技术并购目标企业选择的技术协同机会分析方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2016.
49 Yang M C, Su F P, Chang Y H, et al. “Expand/offense” and “deepen/defense” strategy of patent acquisition for leader and follower: evidence from drug-eluting stent[C]// Proceeding of the 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Piscataway: IEEE, 2016: 1560-1566.
50 邹思明, 邹增明, 曾德明. 协作研发网络对企业技术标准化能力的影响——竞争-互补关系视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(1): 97-104.
51 Wang X F, Qiao Y L, Hou Y J, et al. Measuring technology complementarity between enterprises with an hLDA topic model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021, 68(5): 1309-1320.
52 Li R R, Wang X F, Liu Y Q, et al. Improved technology similarity measurement in the medical field based on subject-action-object semantic structure: a case study of Alzheimer's disease[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2023, 70(1): 280-293.
53 Jee J, Park S, Lee S. Potential of patent image data as technology intelligence source[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(2): 101263.
54 姚颐, 徐亚飞, 凌玥. 技术并购、市场反应与创新产出[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(3): 4-16.
55 王泓略, 曾德明, 陈培帧. 企业知识重组对技术创新绩效的影响: 知识基础关系特征的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(1): 53-61.
56 王媛, 曾德明, 陈静, 等. 技术融合、技术动荡性与新产品开发绩效研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(3): 488-495.
57 孙耀吾, 秦毓, 贺石中. 高技术中小企业知识搜索对创新能力的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(3): 550-557, 576.
58 张运生, 肖锦擘. 创业投资机构股权投资对新创企业技术创新绩效的影响机制[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(8): 148-155.
59 林发勤, 吕雨桐. 跨国并购能否驱动企业创新?: 基于技术和资源互补性的理论和实证研究[J]. 世界经济研究, 2022(10): 102-117, 137.
60 Zhou X A, Mitkova L, Zhang Y, et al. Technology-driven mergers and acquisitions of Chinese acquirers: development of a multi-dimensional framework for post-innovation performance[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2018, 78(4): 280-309.
61 李飞, 陈岩. 并购资源互补性、海外子公司自主权与技术创新[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(12): 18-29.
62 黄苹, 蔡火娣. 跨国并购对企业技术创新质变的影响研究——基于技术互补性调节分析[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(6): 80-89.
63 温亮, 邱鹏君, 马萍萍, 等. 基于SAO语义分析的潜在技术合作伙伴识别[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 19(4): 91-96. |
|
|
|
