|
|
|
| Concepts, Classification, Method Analysis, and Improvement Strategies of Science and Technology Evaluation |
| He Defang1, Pan Yuntao2 |
1.Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, Beijing 100862
2.Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To address the complexities, uncertainties, and non-consensus of science and technology evaluation, this study, starting from the origin and purpose of evaluation, clarifies the concepts, classification, and functions of science and technology evaluation and proposes the use of corresponding reasonable evaluation methods. The study aims to construct a scientific and effective evaluation system and mechanism and establish an evaluation-oriented evaluation system with academic contribution and innovation value at its core. To create a healthy and sustainable innovation ecology, the study presents improvement strategies for science and technology evaluation in terms of special evaluation scheme formulation, coordination of different classifications of evaluation, full-process evaluation, evaluation of true problems, innovative methods, quantitative evaluation, scientific evaluation tool development, academic evaluation of science and technology personnel, and open evaluation.
|
|
Received: 02 September 2022
|
|
|
|
1 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 中华人民共和国国家标准: 科技评估基本术语GB/T 40148-2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
2 科技部、发展改革委、教育部、中科院、自然科学基金委关于印发《加强“从0到1”基础研究工作方案》的通知[EB/OL]. (2020-03-03) [2022-05-02]. https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2020/202003/t20200303_152074.html.
3 Godin B. Measurement and statistics on science and technology: 1920 to the present[M]. London: Routledge, 2005.
4 多纳德·莫尼汉, 斯蒂芬·拉沃图. 绩效管理改革的效果: 来自美国联邦政府的证据[J]. 尚虎平, 郎玫, 马佳铮, 编译. 公共管理学报, 2012, 9(2): 98-105, 127.
5 李志民. 美国的科技评估(评价)[R/OL]. (2019-09-24) [2022-05-02]. https://web.ict.edu.cn/html/lzmwy/pjg/n20190830_62127.
6 Grassano N, Hernandez Guevara H, Fako P, et al. The 2021 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard[R/OL]. (2021-12-17) [2022-05-02]. https://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard/2021-eu-industrial-rd-investment-scoreboard.
7 Clarivate. Top 100 Global InnovatorsTM 2022[EB/OL]. [2022-10-02]. https://clarivate.com/top-100-innovators/.
8 Building on success and learning from experience: an independent review of the Research Excellence Framework[R/OL]. (2016-07-28). [2022-05-02]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/541338/ind-16-9-ref-stern-review.pdf.
9 章熙春, 柳一超. 德国科技创新能力评价的做法与借鉴[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(2): 77-83.
10 方晓东, 董瑜, 金瑛, 等. 法国科技评价发展及其对中国的启示——基于CoNRS和HCéRES评价指标的案例研究[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2019, 41(3): 294-306.
11 陈兆莹. 关于科技评价和科技评价改革的讨论[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(7): 611-617.
12 刘辉锋. 《欧洲创新记分牌2020》评价结果与启示[J]. 科技中国, 2021(1): 42-45.
13 National Science Foundation. Science and engineering indicators[EB/OL]. [2022-05-02]. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind/.
14 Science and Technology Basic Plan[EB/OL]. [2022-05-02]. https://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/science_technology/lawandplan/title01/detail01/1375311.htm.
15 Schwab K, Zahidi S. The Global Competitiveness Report: how countries are performing on the road to recovery[R/OL]. [2022-05-02]. World Economic Forum, 2020. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2020.pdf.
16 IMD world competitiveness booklet 2022[M/OL]. Lausanne: IMD, 2022. [2022-10-02]. https://imd.cld.bz/IMD-World-Competitiveness-Booklet-2022.
17 WIPO. Global Innovation Index 2022[EB/OL]. (2022-09-29) [2022-10-02]. https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2022/article_0011.html.
18 陈宁. 美国的科技评价与科研事后评价概况[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2007, 22(12): 25-31.
19 庞宇, 崔玉亭. 日本的政策评估体系和实践及其对中国科技评估的启示[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2012(3): 148-155.
20 王传珂, 张光军, 徐隆波, 等. 美国国家点火项目第三方评价研究及对中国大科学工程的启示[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(18): 45-50.
21 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅印发《关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见》[EB/OL]. (2018-07-03) [2022-05-02]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.
22 国务院办公厅关于完善科技成果评价机制的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2021-08-02) [2022-05-02]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-08/02/content_5628987.htm.
23 潘云涛. 科技评价理论、方法及实证[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2008.
24 张彦. 论同行评议的改进[J]. 社会科学研究, 2008(3): 86-91.
25 Lotka A J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity[J]. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1926, 16(12): 317-323.
26 杨婕. 美国高等教育绩效拨款政策研究[J]. 高教探索, 2018(2): 78-83.
27 陈华雄, 欧阳进良, 毛建军. 技术成熟度评价在国家科技计划项目管理中的应用探讨[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012, 32(16): 191-195.
28 科技部、教育部、人力资源社会保障部、中科院、工程院关于开展清理“唯论文、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项”专项行动的通知[EB/OL]. (2018-10-15) [2022-05-02]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5446309.htm.
29 教育部办公厅关于开展清理“唯论文、唯帽子、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项”专项行动的通知[EB/OL]. (2018-11-07) [2022-05-02]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5441533.htm.
30 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法[EB/OL]. (2021-12-25) [2022-05-02]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-12/25/content_5664471.htm.
31 陈云伟, 张志强. 科技评价走出“破”与“立”困局的思考与建议[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(8): 796-805. |
|
|
|
